Inter-Reader Variability Using PI-RADS v2 Versus PI-RADS v2.1: Most New Disagreement Stems from Scores 1 and 2

被引：4

作者：

Beetz, Nick Lasse ^{[1
]}

Haas, Matthias ^{[1
]}

Baur, Alexander ^{[1
]}

Konietschke, Frank ^{[2
]}

Roy, Akash ^{[3
]}

Hamm, Charlie Alexander ^{[1
]}

Rudolph, Madhuri Monique ^{[1
]}

Shnayien, Seyd ^{[1
]}

Hamm, Bernd ^{[1
]}

Cash, Hannes ^{[4
]}

Asbach, Patrick ^{[1
]}

Penzkofer, Tobias ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Charite, Dept Radiol, Berlin, Germany

[2] Charite, Dept Biometry & Clin Epidemiol, Berlin, Germany

[3] Duke Univ, Biostat & Bioinformat, Sch Med, Durham, NC USA

[4] Charite, Dept Urol, Berlin, Germany

来源：

ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN | 2022年 / 194卷 / 08期

关键词：

PI-RADS v2; 1; mpMRI; prostate cancer; inter-reader agreement;

D O I：

10.1055/a-1752-1038

中图分类号：

R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];

学科分类号：

1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;

摘要：

Purpose To analyze possible differences in the inter-reader variability between PI-RADS version 2 (v2) and version 2.1 (v2.1) for the classification of prostate lesions using multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) of the prostate. Methods In this retrospective and randomized study, 239 annotated and histopathologically correlated prostate lesions (104 positive and 135 negative for prostate cancer) were rated twice by three experienced uroradiologists using PI-RADS v2 and v2.1 with an interval of at least two months between readings. Results were tabulated across readers and reading timepoints and inter-reader variability was determined using Fleiss kappa (kappa). Thereafter, an additional analysis of the data was performed in which PI-RADS scores 1 and 2 were combined, as they have the same clinical consequences. Results PI-PI-RADS v2.1 showed better inter-reader agreement in the peripheral zone (PZ), but poorer inter-reader agreement in the transition zone (TZ) (PZ: kappa = 0.63 vs. kappa = 0.58; TZ: kappa = 0.47 vs. kappa = 0.57). When PI-RADS scores 1 and 2 were combined, the use of PI-RADS v2.1 resulted in almost perfect inter-reader agreement in the PZ and substantial agreement in the TZ (PZ: kappa = 0.81; TZ: kappa = 0.80). Conclusion PI-RADS v2.1 improves inter-reader agreement in the PZ. New differences in inter-reader agreement were mainly the result of the assignment of PI-RADS v2.1 scores 1 and 2 to lesions in the TZ. Combining scores 1 and 2 improved inter-reader agreement both in the TZ and in the PZ, indicating that refined definitions may be warranted for these PI-RADS scores.

引用

页码：852 / 861

页数：10

共 31 条

[21]

Rosenkrantz AB., 2017, PROPOSED ADJUSTMENTS, V283, P119

[22]

Rudolph MM., 2020, DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMAN, V10, P15982

[23]

Rudolph MM., 2020, VALIDATION PI RADS L, V30, P4262

[24]

Schaudinn A., 2019, COMP PI RADS V1 V2 M, V116, P180

[25]

Tamada T., 2019, COMP PI RADS VERSION, V121, P108704

[26]

Team NGU National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2019, PROSTATE CANC DIAGNO

[27]

Turkbey B., 2019, PROSTATE IMAGING REP, V76, P340

[28]

Vache T., 2014, CHARACTERIZATION PRO, V272, P446

[29]

Vargas HA., 2016, UPDATED PROSTATE IMA, V26, P1606

[30]

Volkin D., 2014, MULTIPARAMETRIC MAGN, V114, pE43

← 1 2 3 4 →