Oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists for treating endometriosis-associated pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:16
作者
Yan, Hailan [1 ,2 ]
Shi, Jinghua [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xiaoyan [1 ,2 ]
Dai, Yi [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Yushi [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Jing [1 ,2 ]
Gu, Zhiyue [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Chenyu [1 ,2 ]
Leng, Jinhua [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Clin Res Ctr Obstet & Gynecol Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Endometriosis; oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists; pain; Bayesian; network meta-analysis; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; GNRH ANTAGONIST; DOUBLE-BLIND; INCONSISTENCY; ELAGOLIX; CONSENSUS; AGONISTS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.08.856
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To review the use of oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists and synthesize their efficacy and safety parameters for the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain. Design: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Setting: Not applicable. Patient(s): Premenopausal women with endometriosis who had experienced moderate or severe pain. Intervention(s): The Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and MEDLINE were searched until April 10, 2022. Only randomized controlled trials were included. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2. A Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis was used to perform indirect comparisons. I-2 was used to assess the global heterogeneity. Relative treatment estimates were performed. Treatment ranking was performed through the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. Main Outcome Measure(s): Endometriosis-associated pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and noncyclic pelvic pain reduction. Result: (s): Five studies and 6 randomized controlled trials, including a total of 2,796 women and 10 different doses of oral GnRH antagonist treatments, were eligible for inclusion. All studies were considered to have a low risk of bias. Almost all efficacy- and safety-related outcomes showed a dose-response relationship. Regarding endometriosis-associated pain, the top 3 treatments were elagolix 400 mg, linzagolix 75 mg, and linzagolix 200 mg, with mean differences of -1.26 (95% credible interval [CrI], -1.70 to -0.79), -0.98 (95% CrI, -1.84 to -0.15), and -0.98 (95% CrI, -1.90 to -0.064), respectively. The top 3 treatments to decrease dysmenorrhea were relugolix 40 mg, elagolix 400 mg, and relugolix 20 mg, with mean differences of -1.60 (95% CrI, -2.07 to -1.14), -1.25 (95% CrI, -1.56 to -0.95), and -1.10 (95% CrI, -1.59 to -0.62), respectively. However, only high-dose treatments were significantly associated with most quality of life- and adverse effect-related outcomes. Relugolix 40 and 20 mg and elagolix 400 mg, with odds ratios of 6.88 (95% CrI, 2.18-24.58), 1.60 (95% CrI, 0.62-4.13), and 1.85 (95% CrI, 1.05-3.30), had a significantly increased incidence of adverse events. Conclusion: (s): Oral GnRH antagonists are effective for endometriosis-associated pain and dysmenorrhea and the patient global impression. The incidence of ovarian hypoestrogenic effects in a short-term duration was significant in a dose-effect response, particularly the highest dose. (C) 2022 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1102 / 1116
页数:15
相关论文
共 47 条
[21]   Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses [J].
Higgins, JPT ;
Thompson, SG ;
Deeks, JJ ;
Altman, DG .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7414) :557-560
[22]   The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials [J].
Higgins, Julian P. T. ;
Altman, Douglas G. ;
Gotzsche, Peter C. ;
Jueni, Peter ;
Moher, David ;
Oxman, Andrew D. ;
Savovic, Jelena ;
Schulz, Kenneth F. ;
Weeks, Laura ;
Sterne, Jonathan A. C. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2011, 343
[23]   Leuprolide acetate depot and hormonal add-back in endometriosis: A 12-month study [J].
Hornstein, MD ;
Surrey, ES ;
Weisberg, GW ;
Casino, LA .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1998, 91 (01) :16-24
[24]   The PRISMA statement extension for systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analysis: PRISMA-NMA [J].
Hutton, Brian ;
Catala-Lopez, Ferran ;
Moher, David .
MEDICINA CLINICA, 2016, 147 (06) :262-266
[25]   Consensus on current management of endometriosis [J].
Johnson, Neil P. ;
Hummelshoj, Lone .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2013, 28 (06) :1552-1568
[26]  
Khalafallah A, 2010, MEDITERR J HEMATOL I, V2, DOI [10.1136/bmj.l4898, 10.4084/MJHID.2010.005]
[27]   Elagolix: First Global Approval [J].
Lamb, Yvette N. .
DRUGS, 2018, 78 (14) :1501-1508
[28]  
Liberati A, 2009, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V339, DOI [10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007, 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097, 10.1136/bmj.b2700, 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.07.299, 10.1136/bmj.b2535, 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1, 10.1136/bmj.i4086]
[29]   Relugolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonist, in women with endometriosis-associated pain: phase 2 safety and efficacy 24-week results [J].
Osuga, Yutaka ;
Seki, Yoshifumi ;
Tanimoto, Masataka ;
Kusumoto, Takeru ;
Kudou, Kentarou ;
Terakawa, Naoki .
BMC WOMENS HEALTH, 2021, 21 (01)
[30]   Relugolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist, reduces endometriosis-associated pain in a dose-response manner: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study [J].
Osuga, Yutaka ;
Seki, Yoshifumi ;
Tanimoto, Masataka ;
Kusumoto, Takeru ;
Kudou, Kentarou ;
Terakawa, Naoki .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2021, 115 (02) :397-405