Oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists for treating endometriosis-associated pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:13
作者
Yan, Hailan [1 ,2 ]
Shi, Jinghua [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xiaoyan [1 ,2 ]
Dai, Yi [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Yushi [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Jing [1 ,2 ]
Gu, Zhiyue [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Chenyu [1 ,2 ]
Leng, Jinhua [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Clin Res Ctr Obstet & Gynecol Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Endometriosis; oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists; pain; Bayesian; network meta-analysis; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; GNRH ANTAGONIST; DOUBLE-BLIND; INCONSISTENCY; ELAGOLIX; CONSENSUS; AGONISTS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.08.856
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To review the use of oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists and synthesize their efficacy and safety parameters for the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain. Design: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Setting: Not applicable. Patient(s): Premenopausal women with endometriosis who had experienced moderate or severe pain. Intervention(s): The Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and MEDLINE were searched until April 10, 2022. Only randomized controlled trials were included. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2. A Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis was used to perform indirect comparisons. I-2 was used to assess the global heterogeneity. Relative treatment estimates were performed. Treatment ranking was performed through the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. Main Outcome Measure(s): Endometriosis-associated pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and noncyclic pelvic pain reduction. Result: (s): Five studies and 6 randomized controlled trials, including a total of 2,796 women and 10 different doses of oral GnRH antagonist treatments, were eligible for inclusion. All studies were considered to have a low risk of bias. Almost all efficacy- and safety-related outcomes showed a dose-response relationship. Regarding endometriosis-associated pain, the top 3 treatments were elagolix 400 mg, linzagolix 75 mg, and linzagolix 200 mg, with mean differences of -1.26 (95% credible interval [CrI], -1.70 to -0.79), -0.98 (95% CrI, -1.84 to -0.15), and -0.98 (95% CrI, -1.90 to -0.064), respectively. The top 3 treatments to decrease dysmenorrhea were relugolix 40 mg, elagolix 400 mg, and relugolix 20 mg, with mean differences of -1.60 (95% CrI, -2.07 to -1.14), -1.25 (95% CrI, -1.56 to -0.95), and -1.10 (95% CrI, -1.59 to -0.62), respectively. However, only high-dose treatments were significantly associated with most quality of life- and adverse effect-related outcomes. Relugolix 40 and 20 mg and elagolix 400 mg, with odds ratios of 6.88 (95% CrI, 2.18-24.58), 1.60 (95% CrI, 0.62-4.13), and 1.85 (95% CrI, 1.05-3.30), had a significantly increased incidence of adverse events. Conclusion: (s): Oral GnRH antagonists are effective for endometriosis-associated pain and dysmenorrhea and the patient global impression. The incidence of ovarian hypoestrogenic effects in a short-term duration was significant in a dose-effect response, particularly the highest dose. (C) 2022 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1102 / 1116
页数:15
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [11] The Burden of Endometriosis on Women's Lifespan: A Narrative Overview on Quality of Life and Psychosocial Wellbeing
    Della Corte, Luigi
    Di Filippo, Claudia
    Gabrielli, Olimpia
    Reppuccia, Sabrina
    La Rosa, Valentina Lucia
    Ragusa, Rosalia
    Fichera, Michele
    Commodari, Elena
    Bifulco, Giuseppe
    Giampaolino, Pierluigi
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (13) : 1 - 17
  • [12] Elagolix Treatment for Endometriosis-Associated Pain: Results from a Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study
    Diamond, Michael P.
    Carr, Bruce
    Dmowski, W. Paul
    Koltun, William
    O'Brien, Chris
    Jiang, Ping
    Burke, Joshua
    Jimenez, Roland
    Garner, Elizabeth
    Chwalisz, Kristof
    [J]. REPRODUCTIVE SCIENCES, 2014, 21 (03) : 363 - 371
  • [13] Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 4: Inconsistency in Networks of Evidence Based on Randomized Controlled Trials
    Dias, Sofia
    Welton, Nicky J.
    Sutton, Alex J.
    Caldwell, Deborah M.
    Lu, Guobing
    Ades, A. E.
    [J]. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2013, 33 (05) : 641 - 656
  • [14] Treatment of endometriosis-associated pain with linzagolix, an oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone-antagonist: a randomized clinical trial
    Donnez, Jacques
    Taylor, Hugh S.
    Taylor, Robert N.
    Akin, Mark D.
    Tatarchuk, Tatyana F.
    Wilk, Krzysztof
    Gotteland, Jean-Pierre
    Lecomte, Veronique
    Bestel, Elke
    [J]. FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2020, 114 (01) : 44 - 55
  • [15] Current and emerging treatment options for endometriosis
    Ferrero, Simone
    Evangelisti, Giulio
    Barra, Fabio
    [J]. EXPERT OPINION ON PHARMACOTHERAPY, 2018, 19 (10) : 1109 - 1125
  • [16] GONADOTROPIN-RELEASING-HORMONE AGONISTS - A GUIDE TO USE AND SELECTION
    FILICORI, M
    [J]. DRUGS, 1994, 48 (01) : 41 - 58
  • [17] Comparative efficacy and acceptability of first-generation and second-generation antidepressants in the acute treatment of major depression: protocol for a network meta-analysis
    Furukawa, Toshi A.
    Salanti, Georgia
    Atkinson, Lauren Z.
    Leucht, Stefan
    Ruhe, Henricus G.
    Turner, Erick H.
    Chaimani, Anna
    Ogawa, Yusuke
    Takeshima, Nozomi
    Hayasaka, Yu
    Imai, Hissei
    Shinohara, Kiyomi
    Suganuma, Aya
    Watanabe, Norio
    Stockton, Sarah
    Geddes, John R.
    Cipriani, Andrea
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2016, 6 (07):
  • [18] Endometriosis.
    Giudice, Linda C.
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (25) : 2389 - 2398
  • [19] GRADE:: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations
    Guyatt, Gordon H.
    Oxman, Andrew D.
    Vist, Gunn E.
    Kunz, Regina
    Falck-Ytter, Yngve
    Alonso-Coello, Pablo
    Schuenemann, Holger J.
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 336 (7650): : 924 - 926
  • [20] Consistency and inconsistency in network meta-analysis: concepts and models for multi-arm studies
    Higgins, J. P. T.
    Jackson, D.
    Barrett, J. K.
    Lu, G.
    Ades, A. E.
    White, I. R.
    [J]. RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS, 2012, 3 (02) : 98 - 110