Oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists for treating endometriosis-associated pain: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

被引:13
作者
Yan, Hailan [1 ,2 ]
Shi, Jinghua [1 ,2 ]
Li, Xiaoyan [1 ,2 ]
Dai, Yi [1 ,2 ]
Wu, Yushi [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Jing [1 ,2 ]
Gu, Zhiyue [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Chenyu [1 ,2 ]
Leng, Jinhua [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci & Peking Union Med Coll, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Clin Res Ctr Obstet & Gynecol Dis, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Endometriosis; oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists; pain; Bayesian; network meta-analysis; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; GNRH ANTAGONIST; DOUBLE-BLIND; INCONSISTENCY; ELAGOLIX; CONSENSUS; AGONISTS; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.08.856
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To review the use of oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists and synthesize their efficacy and safety parameters for the treatment of endometriosis-associated pain. Design: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. Setting: Not applicable. Patient(s): Premenopausal women with endometriosis who had experienced moderate or severe pain. Intervention(s): The Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and MEDLINE were searched until April 10, 2022. Only randomized controlled trials were included. The risk of bias in the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2. A Bayesian random-effects network meta-analysis was used to perform indirect comparisons. I-2 was used to assess the global heterogeneity. Relative treatment estimates were performed. Treatment ranking was performed through the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. The certainty of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. Main Outcome Measure(s): Endometriosis-associated pain, dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and noncyclic pelvic pain reduction. Result: (s): Five studies and 6 randomized controlled trials, including a total of 2,796 women and 10 different doses of oral GnRH antagonist treatments, were eligible for inclusion. All studies were considered to have a low risk of bias. Almost all efficacy- and safety-related outcomes showed a dose-response relationship. Regarding endometriosis-associated pain, the top 3 treatments were elagolix 400 mg, linzagolix 75 mg, and linzagolix 200 mg, with mean differences of -1.26 (95% credible interval [CrI], -1.70 to -0.79), -0.98 (95% CrI, -1.84 to -0.15), and -0.98 (95% CrI, -1.90 to -0.064), respectively. The top 3 treatments to decrease dysmenorrhea were relugolix 40 mg, elagolix 400 mg, and relugolix 20 mg, with mean differences of -1.60 (95% CrI, -2.07 to -1.14), -1.25 (95% CrI, -1.56 to -0.95), and -1.10 (95% CrI, -1.59 to -0.62), respectively. However, only high-dose treatments were significantly associated with most quality of life- and adverse effect-related outcomes. Relugolix 40 and 20 mg and elagolix 400 mg, with odds ratios of 6.88 (95% CrI, 2.18-24.58), 1.60 (95% CrI, 0.62-4.13), and 1.85 (95% CrI, 1.05-3.30), had a significantly increased incidence of adverse events. Conclusion: (s): Oral GnRH antagonists are effective for endometriosis-associated pain and dysmenorrhea and the patient global impression. The incidence of ovarian hypoestrogenic effects in a short-term duration was significant in a dose-effect response, particularly the highest dose. (C) 2022 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1102 / 1116
页数:15
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues and endometriosis: current strategies and new insights
    Abu Hashim, Hatem
    [J]. GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2012, 28 (04) : 314 - 321
  • [2] Adams ED, 2024, JOGNN-J OBST GYN NEO, V53, P590, DOI [10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00622-5, 10.1016/j.jogn.2024.09.009]
  • [3] GnRH antagonists are safer than agonists: an update of a Cochrane review
    Al-Inany, Hesham G.
    Youssef, Mohamed A. F. M.
    Aboulghar, Mohamed
    Broekmans, Frank
    Sterrenburg, Monique
    Smit, Janine
    Abou-Setta, Ahmed M.
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2011, 17 (04) : 435 - 435
  • [4] ESHRE guideline: endometriosis
    Becker, Christian M.
    Bokor, Attila
    Heikinheimo, Oskari
    Horne, Andrew
    Jansen, Femke
    Kiesel, Ludwig
    King, Kathleen
    Kvaskoff, Marina
    Nap, Annemiek
    Petersen, Katrine
    Saridogan, Ertan
    Tomassetti, Carla
    van Hanegem, Nehalennia
    Vulliemoz, Nicolas
    Vermeulen, Nathalie
    [J]. HUMAN REPRODUCTION OPEN, 2022, 2022 (02)
  • [5] Oral contraceptives for pain associated with endometriosis (Review)
    Brown, Julie
    Crawford, Tineke J.
    Datta, Shree
    Prentice, Andrew
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2018, (05):
  • [6] An Overview of Treatments for Endometriosis
    Brown, Julie
    Farquhar, Cynthia
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2015, 313 (03): : 296 - 297
  • [7] Progestagens and anti-progestagens for pain associated with endometriosis
    Brown, Julie
    Kives, Sari
    Akhtar, Muhammad
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2012, (03):
  • [8] Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogues for pain associated with endometriosis
    Brown, Julie
    Pan, Alice
    Hart, Roger J.
    [J]. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2010, (12):
  • [9] Elagolix, an oral GnRH antagonist for endometriosis-associated pain: a randomized controlled study
    Carr, Bruce
    Giudice, Linda
    Dmowski, W. Paul
    O'Brien, Chris
    Jiang, Ping
    Burke, Joshua
    Jimenez, Roland
    Hass, Steven
    Fuldeore, Mahesh
    Chwalisz, Kristof
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENDOMETRIOSIS AND PELVIC PAIN DISORDERS, 2013, 5 (03) : 105 - 115
  • [10] Rethinking mechanisms, diagnosis and management of endometriosis
    Chapron, Charles
    Marcellin, Louis
    Borghese, Bruno
    Santulli, Pietro
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS ENDOCRINOLOGY, 2019, 15 (11) : 666 - 682