The characteristics of intellectual property rights regimes: How formal and informal institutions affect outward FDI location

被引:47
作者
Papageorgiadis, Nikolaos [1 ,2 ]
McDonald, Frank [3 ]
Wang, Chengang [4 ]
Konara, Palitha [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Management Sch, Chatham Bldg, Liverpool L69 7ZH, Merseyside, England
[2] Uppsala Univ, Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Univ Leeds, Leeds Univ Business Sch, CIBUL, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ Bradford, Sch Management, Emm Lane, Bradford BD9 4JL, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ Sussex, Business Sch, Brighton BN1 9RH, E Sussex, England
关键词
Economic rights; Intellectual property; Formal & informal institutions; Legal arrangements; FDI; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; PATENT PROTECTION; TRANSACTION COSTS; DETERMINANTS; IMPACT; TRANSITION; ECONOMICS; DISTANCE; SYSTEMS; TRADE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101620
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study examines the institutional arrangements that define the characteristics of national legal systems that are used to protect intellectual property (IP) assets embedded in outward FDI. The focus of the study is on how the institutional underpinnings of IPR regimes affect the costs and risk of using legal arenas to enable effective use of IP assets. Following a property rights approach it is postulated that formal and informal institutional arrangements influence how IP regimes affect the transaction costs and risk associated with converting ownership rights over IP into economic rights. Informal institutions are considered to affect the behaviour of agents involved in enforcing legal rights. This behaviour influences how IP law is implemented in legal arenas and thereby impacts on the efficacy of IPR regimes to help secure economic rights from the use of IP assets. Using data on outward FDI from the USA to 42 host countries the results find that the strength of informal institutions connected to the enforcement of IP in a country directly affects outcomes and positively moderates the effect of formal legal aspects of IP law on FDI flows. The results highlight the importance of informal institutional aspects connected to the behaviour of enforcement agents when using national legal systems to protect IP rights in cross frontier transactions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 81 条
[51]  
Office of the US Trade Representative, 2017, 2017 TRAD POL AG 201
[52]   International trade, foreign direct investment, and transaction costs in languages [J].
Oh, Chang Hoon ;
Selmier, W. Travis ;
Lien, Donald .
JOURNAL OF SOCIO-ECONOMICS, 2011, 40 (06) :732-735
[53]   The measurement of intellectual property rights protection [J].
Ostergard, RL .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS STUDIES, 2000, 31 (02) :349-360
[54]  
Ostrom Elinor, 1997, Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, DOI [10.2307/3146384, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511807763, 10.1017/CBO9781316423936]
[55]   Is FDI doing good? A golden rule for FDI ethics [J].
Paniagua, Jordi ;
Sapena, Juan .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2014, 67 (05) :807-812
[56]   Defining and Measuring the Institutional Context of National Intellectual Property Systems in a post-TRIPS world [J].
Papageorgiadis, Nikolaos ;
McDonald, Frank .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 25 (01) :3-18
[57]   International patent systems strength 1998-2011 [J].
Papageorgiadis, Nikolaos ;
Cross, Adam R. ;
Alexiou, Constantinos .
JOURNAL OF WORLD BUSINESS, 2014, 49 (04) :586-597
[58]   The impact of the institution of patent protection and enforcement on entry mode strategy: A panel data investigation of US firms [J].
Papageorgiadis, Nikolaos ;
Cross, Adam R. ;
Alexiou, Constantinos .
INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2013, 22 (01) :278-292
[59]   International patent protection: 1960-2005 [J].
Park, Walter G. .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2008, 37 (04) :761-766
[60]  
Pejovich S., 1999, Journal of Markets and Morality, V2, P164