The characteristics of intellectual property rights regimes: How formal and informal institutions affect outward FDI location

被引:47
作者
Papageorgiadis, Nikolaos [1 ,2 ]
McDonald, Frank [3 ]
Wang, Chengang [4 ]
Konara, Palitha [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Management Sch, Chatham Bldg, Liverpool L69 7ZH, Merseyside, England
[2] Uppsala Univ, Uppsala, Sweden
[3] Univ Leeds, Leeds Univ Business Sch, CIBUL, Leeds LS2 9JT, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ Bradford, Sch Management, Emm Lane, Bradford BD9 4JL, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ Sussex, Business Sch, Brighton BN1 9RH, E Sussex, England
关键词
Economic rights; Intellectual property; Formal & informal institutions; Legal arrangements; FDI; FOREIGN DIRECT-INVESTMENT; PATENT PROTECTION; TRANSACTION COSTS; DETERMINANTS; IMPACT; TRANSITION; ECONOMICS; DISTANCE; SYSTEMS; TRADE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.101620
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study examines the institutional arrangements that define the characteristics of national legal systems that are used to protect intellectual property (IP) assets embedded in outward FDI. The focus of the study is on how the institutional underpinnings of IPR regimes affect the costs and risk of using legal arenas to enable effective use of IP assets. Following a property rights approach it is postulated that formal and informal institutional arrangements influence how IP regimes affect the transaction costs and risk associated with converting ownership rights over IP into economic rights. Informal institutions are considered to affect the behaviour of agents involved in enforcing legal rights. This behaviour influences how IP law is implemented in legal arenas and thereby impacts on the efficacy of IPR regimes to help secure economic rights from the use of IP assets. Using data on outward FDI from the USA to 42 host countries the results find that the strength of informal institutions connected to the enforcement of IP in a country directly affects outcomes and positively moderates the effect of formal legal aspects of IP law on FDI flows. The results highlight the importance of informal institutional aspects connected to the behaviour of enforcement agents when using national legal systems to protect IP rights in cross frontier transactions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]   Culture and Institutions [J].
Alesina, Alberto ;
Giuliano, Paola .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2015, 53 (04) :898-944
[2]  
Andersson U, 2020, JIBS SPEC COLLECT, P331, DOI [10.1007/978-3-030-22113-3_16, 10.1057/jibs.2014.50]
[3]  
[Anonymous], FOR INV CLIM CHIN PR
[4]  
[Anonymous], IMF WORKING PAPERS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide
[6]  
[Anonymous], CURR ISS INT PROP
[7]  
[Anonymous], INT PROP RIGHTS CHAL
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2017, World Intellectual Property Indicators 2017
[9]  
Barzel Y., 1997, Economic Analysis of Property Rights
[10]   Weights and importance in composite indicators: Closing the gap [J].
Becker, William ;
Saisana, Michaela ;
Paruolo, Paolo ;
Vandecasteele, Ine .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2017, 80 :12-22