Zofenopril versus lisinopril in the treatment of essential hypertension in elderly patients - A randomised, double-blind, multicentre study

被引:17
|
作者
Malacco, E [1 ]
Piazza, S [1 ]
Omboni, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Osped L Sacco, I-20157 Milan, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00044011-200525030-00003
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background: Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been proposed as first-choice drugs for antihypertensive therapy in elderly subjects because of their demonstrated efficacy and safety. However, no information is currently available on the use of zofenopril in elderly hypertensive patients. Objective: To assess the efficacy and safety of zofenopril (30 or 60mg once daily) compared with lisinopril (10 or 20mg once daily). Patients and methods: Patients aged >= 65 years with mild to moderate essential hypertension (sitting diastolic blood pressure [DBP] >= 90mm Hg and <= 1 10mm Hg) were included in the study. They were randomised to receive either zofenopril 30mg or lisinopril 10mg. Blood pressure and heart rate were measured at baseline and after 4 and 12 weeks of treatment. Patients underwent electrocardiography and evaluation of laboratory parameters at baseline and after 12 weeks. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was also performed at baseline and after 12 weeks. After 4 weeks drug doses were doubled in patients whose sitting DBP was >= 90mm Hg. The primary endpoint was to achieve sitting DBP values < 90mm Hg or a reduction of sitting DBP > 10mm Hg after 12 weeks of treatment. Results: 181 patients were randomised to treatment and 164 patients completed the study. Thirty-three patients were included in the analysis of 24-hour blood pressure monitoring. The percentage of patients with normalised sitting DBP (< 90mm Hg) and the rate of treatment responders (reduction of sitting DBP >= 10mm Hg) were not significantly different between the two treatment groups (normalised: zofenopril 81.3% vs lisinopril 76.7%; responders: zofenopril 74.7% vs lisinopril 77.8%). At the end of the treatment sitting DBP was not significantly different between the two treatment groups (zofenopril 82.2 +/- 6.6mm Hg vs lisinopril 82.0 +/- 7.8mm Hg). Eight percent of patients experienced adverse events in the zofenopril group and 9% in the lisinopril group. A small percentage of adverse events (4%) was related to treatment and reported in the zofenopril group. Conclusions: In elderly hypertensive patients, treatment with zofenopril was effective and well tolerated. Efficacy and safety were comparable with those of lisinopril.
引用
收藏
页码:175 / 182
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Zofenopril versus Lisinopril in the Treatment of Essential Hypertension in Elderly PatientsA Randomised, Double-Blind, Multicentre Study
    Ettore Malacco
    Simona Piazza
    Stefano Omboni
    Clinical Drug Investigation, 2005, 25 : 175 - 182
  • [2] Evaluation of the efficacy and tolerability of nebivolol versus lisinopril in the treatment of essential arterial hypertension: A randomized, multicentre, double-blind study
    Rosei, EA
    Rizzoni, D
    Comini, S
    Boari, G
    BLOOD PRESSURE, 2003, 12 : 30 - 35
  • [3] A DOUBLE-BLIND COMPARATIVE-STUDY OF LISINOPRIL AND ENALAPRIL IN PATIENTS WITH ESSENTIAL-HYPERTENSION
    JOHNSTON, GD
    BANKS, DC
    DAVIES, S
    DUFFIN, D
    GARNHAM, JC
    NICHOLLS, DP
    RAJ, MV
    MANSY, S
    SLOAN, P
    STROUTHIDIS, TM
    SULLIVAN, PA
    THURSTON, H
    VARMA, MP
    WATSON, RD
    WILKINSON, R
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 1991, 5 (05) : 405 - 410
  • [4] Zofenopril or irbesartan plus hydrochlorothiazide in elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension untreated or uncontrolled by previous treatment: a double-blind, randomized study
    Modesti, Pietro A.
    Omboni, Stefano
    Taddei, Stefano
    Ghione, Sergio
    Portaluppi, Francesco
    Pozzilli, Paolo
    Volpe, Massimo
    Arca, Marcello
    Calabro, Paolo
    Fulgheri, Paolo L. Dessi
    Bucci, Marco
    Berra, Sergio
    Villani, Giovanni Q.
    Vladoianu, Mircea
    Popescu, Elena
    Velican, Valerica G.
    Pirvu, Octavian
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2016, 34 (03) : 576 - 587
  • [5] Nebivolol vs enalapril in the treatment of essential hypertension: a double-blind randomised trial
    L Van Nueten
    A Schelling
    C Vertommen
    AG Dupont
    JIS Robertson
    Journal of Human Hypertension, 1997, 11 : 813 - 819
  • [6] Nebivolol vs enalapril in the treatment of essential hypertension: a double-blind randomised trial
    Van Nueten, L
    Schelling, A
    Vertommen, C
    Dupont, AG
    Robertson, JIS
    JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 1997, 11 (12) : 813 - 819
  • [7] DOUBLE BLIND RANDOMISED COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EFFICACY AND TOLERABILITY OF TELMISARTAN AND LISINOPRIL IN MALE PATIENTS OF STAGE 1 ESSENTIAL HYPERTENSION
    Rao, R. Srinivasa
    Prabhakar, K. R.
    JOURNAL OF EVOLUTION OF MEDICAL AND DENTAL SCIENCES-JEMDS, 2015, 4 (95): : 16094 - 16097
  • [8] Sertraline versus fluvoxamine in the treatment of elderly patients with major depression: A double-blind, randomised trial
    Rossini, D
    Franchini, L
    Smeraldi, E
    Zanardi, R
    EUROPEAN NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2002, 12 : S251 - S251
  • [9] Reboxetine versus imipramine in the treatment of elderly patients with depressive disorders: a double-blind randomised trial
    Katona, C
    Bercoff, E
    Chiu, E
    Tack, P
    Versiani, M
    Woelk, H
    JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS, 1999, 55 (2-3) : 203 - 213
  • [10] DOUBLE-BLIND MULTICENTER STUDY OF INDAPAMIDE IN TREATMENT OF ESSENTIAL HYPERTENSION
    HASHIDA, JG
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 1977, 5 : 116 - 123