Marginal Effects in Interaction Models: Determining and Controlling the False Positive Rate

被引:74
作者
Esarey, Justin [1 ]
Sumner, Jane Lawrence [2 ]
机构
[1] Rice Univ, Polit Sci, Houston, TX 77005 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN USA
关键词
political parties; quantitative methods; interaction; MULTIPLE DECISION-PROBLEMS; INTERACTION TERMS; PROBIT MODELS; LOGIT; TESTS;
D O I
10.1177/0010414017730080
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
When a researcher suspects that the marginal effect of x on y varies with z, a common approach is to plot. y/. x at different values of z along with a pointwise confidence interval generated using the procedure described in Brambor, Clark, and Golder to assess the magnitude and statistical significance of the relationship. Our article makes three contributions. First, we demonstrate that the Brambor, Clark, and Golder approach produces statistically significant findings when. y/. x = 0 at a rate that can be many times larger or smaller than the nominal false positive rate of the test. Second, we introduce the interactionTest software package for R to implement procedures that allow easy control of the false positive rate. Finally, we illustrate our findings by replicating an empirical analysis of the relationship between ethnic heterogeneity and the number of political parties from Comparative Political Studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1144 / 1176
页数:33
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Interaction terms in logit and probit models [J].
Ai, CR ;
Norton, EC .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2003, 80 (01) :123-129
[2]  
Amorim Neto O., 2007, AM J POLIT SCI, V41, P149
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2017, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2004, APPL LINEAR STAT MOD
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2007, Encyclopedia of measurement and statistics, DOI [DOI 10.4135/9781412952644, 10.4135/9781412952644]
[6]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[7]   Improving Tests of Theories Positing Interaction [J].
Berry, William D. ;
Golder, Matt ;
Milton, Daniel .
JOURNAL OF POLITICS, 2012, 74 (03) :653-671
[8]   Testing for Interaction in Binary Logit and Probit Models: Is a Product Term Essential? [J].
Berry, William D. ;
DeMeritt, Jacqueline H. R. ;
Esarey, Justin .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2010, 54 (01) :248-266
[9]   Understanding interaction models: Improving empirical analyses [J].
Brambor, T ;
Clark, WR ;
Golder, M .
POLITICAL ANALYSIS, 2006, 14 (01) :63-82
[10]   Hypothesis testing and multiplicative interaction terms [J].
Braumoeller, BF .
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION, 2004, 58 (04) :807-820