Paclobutrazol removal from irrigation water using a commercial-scale granular activated carbon system

被引:4
|
作者
Grant, George A. [1 ]
Fisher, Paul R. [1 ]
Barrett, James E. [1 ]
Wilson, Patrick C. [2 ]
Raudales, Rosa E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, IFAS, Dept Environm Hort, 1549 Fifield Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[2] Univ Florida, IFAS, Soil & Water Sci Dept, 2181 McCarty Hall, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] Univ Connecticut, Dept Plant Sci & Landscape Architecture, 1376 Storrs Rd,Unit 4067, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
基金
美国食品与农业研究所;
关键词
Agrichemical; Bioassay; Filtration; Plant growth regulator; Recycling; Remediation; SUBIRRIGATION WATER; GAC ADSORPTION; ORGANIC-MATTER; WASTE-WATER; PERFORMANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.scienta.2018.06.093
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
A commercial-scale granular activated carbon (GAC) system was evaluated for removal of the plant growth regulator paclobutrazol [(2RS,3RS)-1-(4-chlorophenyl)-4,4-dimethyl-2-(1H-1,2,4-triazol-1-yl)pentan-3-ol] from recaptured irrigation water in an ornamental greenhouse operation. This greenhouse collected and re-used irrigation drain water from 8.1 ha of subirrigated greenhouse production space, resulting in approximately 5.4 million L of recycled irrigation water filtered annually by GAC. Recaptured water was pre-filtered with polyester bag filters and then passed through three 1000 L (454 kg) GAC vessels in series before being recycled for irrigation purposes. Each GAC filter contained 8 x 30 US mesh (595-2380 mu m) bituminous coal-based GAC. In Experiment 1, paclobutrazol concentration was analyzed in pre- and post-GAC filtration samples approximately weekly with a total of 55 samples between March 2015 and August 2016. The highest concentration of paclobutrazol found in recycled irrigation water was 72.5 mu g L-1, whereas residual concentration after GAC was below a target 5 mu g L-1 in all samples. In Experiment 2, water samples collected pre- and post-GAC filtration four times over a ten-week period during a peak period of plant production and included chemical analysis and a broccoli bioassay. The GAC filtration in Experiment 2 was effective at paclobutrazol removal despite wide variation in flow rates and resulting contact times (11-31 min) through the filter. In Experiment 3, samples were taken in a random order from the outlet of each individual GAC filter with contact times of 0, 10, 21, or 31 min. After 31 min of GAC contact time, broccoli bioassay plants were 7% (0.22 cm) shorter than control plants that received 0 mu g L-1 paclobutrazol. There was a 30% average reduction in paclobutrazol concentration with the addition of each GAC filter or approximately 10 additional minutes of contact time with each GAC filter, reduced from 16.3 mu g L-1 for the control to 1.7 mu g L-1 after 31 min contact time. A partial budget showed GAC media replacement to be the highest operating cost item associated with treating recaptured irrigation water, contributing approximately 30% of the total annual cost of $13,020. There was no indication of reduced effectiveness of GAC paclobutrazol removal after approximately one year of filtration without GAC replacement.
引用
收藏
页码:160 / 166
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Removal of paclobutrazol from irrigation water using granular-activated carbon
    Grant, George A.
    Fisher, Paul R.
    Barrett, James E.
    Wilson, Patrick C.
    IRRIGATION SCIENCE, 2018, 36 (03) : 159 - 166
  • [2] Removal of paclobutrazol from irrigation water using granular-activated carbon
    George A. Grant
    Paul R. Fisher
    James E. Barrett
    Patrick C. Wilson
    Irrigation Science, 2018, 36 : 159 - 166
  • [3] Remediating Paclobutrazol from Irrigation Water Using Activated Carbon
    Grant, George A.
    Fisher, Paul
    Barrett, James E.
    Wilson, Christopher P.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2016, 51 (09) : S170 - S170
  • [4] Remediating Agrichemicals from Irrigation Water Using Granular Activated Carbon
    Grant, George A.
    Fisher, Paul
    Wilson, Christopher P.
    Barrett, James E.
    HORTSCIENCE, 2017, 52 (09) : S221 - S221
  • [5] Removal of bromate ion from water using granular activated carbon
    Bao, ML
    Griffini, O
    Santianni, D
    Barbieri, K
    Burrini, D
    Pantani, F
    WATER RESEARCH, 1999, 33 (13) : 2959 - 2970
  • [6] The removal of bromate from potable water using granular activated carbon
    Mills, A
    Belghazi, A
    Rodman, D
    Hitchins, P
    JOURNAL OF THE CHARTERED INSTITUTION OF WATER AND ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 1996, 10 (03): : 215 - 217
  • [7] Removal of Agrichemicals from Water Using Granular Activated Carbon Filtration
    Grant, George A.
    Fisher, Paul R.
    Barrett, James E.
    Wilson, Patrick C.
    WATER AIR AND SOIL POLLUTION, 2019, 230 (01):
  • [8] Removal of Agrichemicals from Water Using Granular Activated Carbon Filtration
    George A. Grant
    Paul R. Fisher
    James E. Barrett
    Patrick C. Wilson
    Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 2019, 230
  • [9] Removal of cyanide from water and wastewater using granular activated carbon
    Dash, Rajesh Roshan
    Balomajumder, Chandrajit
    Kumar, Arvind
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL, 2009, 146 (03) : 408 - 413
  • [10] Bromate removal from water using granular activated carbon in a batch recycle
    Konsowa, A. H.
    DESALINATION AND WATER TREATMENT, 2009, 12 (1-3) : 375 - 381