Method comparison of four clinically available assays for serum free light chain analysis

被引:24
|
作者
Fleming, Cherina K. A. [1 ]
Swarttouw, Tim [1 ]
Angelino, Corrie M. de Kat [2 ]
Jacobs, Joannes F. M. [2 ]
Russcher, Henk [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus MC, Univ Med Ctr Rotterdam, Dept Clin Chem, Dr Molewaterpl 40,Room Na407, NL-3015 GD Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, Dept Lab Med, Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
free light chains; M-protein; monoclonal gammopathy; multiple myeloma; serum protein electrophoresis; N LATEX FLC; KAPPA; LAMBDA; PERFORMANCE; DIAGNOSIS; MYELOMA;
D O I
10.1515/cclm-2019-0533
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background: Serum free light chain (sFLC) measurements are increasingly important in the context of screening for monoclonal gammopathies, prognostic stratification and monitoring of therapy responses. In this study we have performed a method comparison of four sFLC assays that are currently available for routine clinical use. Methods: In a retrospective study, sFLC analyses were performed on a cohort that included 139 patients with various monoclonal gammopathies and 54 control sera without an M-protein. Method comparisons of the following four FLC assays were performed: Freelite (Binding Site), N-Latex FLC (Siemens), Seralite (Abingdon Health) and Sebia FLC (Sebia). Results: Bland-Altman agreement analysis showed biases varying between -0.1 and 16.2 mg/L for kappa FLC, -6.0 and 6.8 mg/L for lambda FLC and -0.04 and 0.38 for the ratio of the involved to uninvolved FLC. Strong agreements were observed for FLC-concentrations below 100 mg/L. The clinical concordance of the kappa/lambda FLC-ratio of the four methods varied between 86% and 92%. Significant quantitative differences were observed between the different methods, mainly in sera with high FLC concentrations. Most assays consistently overestimated FLC concentrations compared to SPE. Conclusions: Good overall clinical concordances were observed between the four sFLC assays that were compared in this study. Although good agreements were observed between the FLC assays, significant absolute differences in FLC concentrations in individual patients can be seen, particularly at higher FLC concentrations. Because of inequivalent absolute sFLC values between the methods in individual patients, none of the four sFLC assays can be used interchangeably.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 94
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Method comparison of three serum free light chain assays on the Roche Cobas 6000 c501 chemistry analyzer
    Augustijn, Dieuwertje
    Jacobs, Joannes F. M.
    Russcher, Henk
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2022, 60 (03) : 379 - 385
  • [2] Serum free light chain quantitative assays: Dilemma of a biomarker
    Cigliana, Giovanni
    Gulli, Francesca
    Napodano, Cecilia
    Pocino, Krizia
    De Santis, Elena
    Colacicco, Luigi
    Cordone, Iole
    Conti, Laura
    Basile, Umberto
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS, 2018, 32 (02)
  • [3] Comparison of Serum Immunofixation Electrophoresis and Free Light Chain Assays in the Detection of Monoclonal Gammopathies
    Wood, Prescilla B.
    McElroy, Yolonda G.
    Stone, Marvin J.
    CLINICAL LYMPHOMA MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA, 2010, 10 (04) : 278 - 280
  • [4] Comparison of Freelite and N-Latex serum free light chain assays: a critical review
    Daves, Massimo
    Piccin, Andrea
    Roccaforte, Vincenzo
    Lippi, Giuseppe
    BIOCHEMIA MEDICA, 2021, 31 (03)
  • [5] Comparison of 2 Serum-Free Light-Chain Assays in CKD Patients
    Ben Sprangers
    Claes, Kathleen
    Evenepoel, Pieter
    Kuypers, Dirk
    Poesen, Koen
    Delforge, Michel
    Bossuyt, Xavier
    Meijers, Bjorn
    KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL REPORTS, 2020, 5 (05): : 627 - 631
  • [6] Is accuracy of serum free light chain measurement achievable?
    Jacobs, Joannes F. M.
    Tate, Jillian R.
    Merlini, Giampaolo
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2016, 54 (06) : 1021 - 1030
  • [7] Serum free light chain analysis: persisting limitations with new kids on the block
    Van Hoovels, Lieve
    Vercammen, Martine
    Nevejan, Louis
    Cornette, Margot
    Briers, Pieter-Jan
    Deeren, Dries
    Van Droogenbroeck, Jan
    Fostier, Karel
    De Smet, Dieter
    CLINICAL CHEMISTRY AND LABORATORY MEDICINE, 2022, 60 (09) : 1440 - 1448
  • [8] Monoclonal free light chain detection and quantification: Performances and limits of available laboratory assays
    Sarto, C.
    Intra, J.
    Fania, C.
    Brivio, R.
    Brambilla, P.
    Leoni, V.
    CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2021, 95 : 28 - 33
  • [9] Serum free light chain reference intervals in an Optilite and their influence on clinical guidelines
    Morales-Garcia, Luis J.
    Pacheco-Delgado, Maria S.
    CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2021, 92 : 54 - 60
  • [10] Freelite and Kloneus assays in free light chain measurements in patients with renal impairment
    Morales-Garcia, Luis J.
    Rodriguez, Rosa M. Lillo
    Pacheco-Delgado, Maria S.
    CLINICAL BIOCHEMISTRY, 2023, 118