Forecasting of BTC volatility: comparative study between parametric and nonparametric models

被引:12
作者
Khaldi, Rohaifa [1 ]
El Afia, Abdellatif [1 ]
Chiheb, Raddouane [1 ]
机构
[1] Mohammed V Univ, ENSIAS, Rabat, Morocco
关键词
Forecasting; Volatility; Bitcoin; GARCH-type models; ANN models; Time series; SAFE-HAVEN; BITCOIN; CRYPTOCURRENCIES; INEFFICIENCY; RETURNS; PREDICT;
D O I
10.1007/s13748-019-00196-w
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Bitcoin has rapidly gained much attention by media, investors and scholars, since it is widely used for investment purposes as an alternative to regular currencies. The price of bitcoin is characterized with high volatility, which makes firms that hold large amounts of it prone to risks. To prevent those risks and to gain insights into its behavior and trading strategies, it is necessary to forecast bitcoin volatility. In that context, this study reviews the impact of different factors on BTC price, returns and volatility. Moreover, it examines the sensitivity of GARCH family models to standardized residuals distributions in forecasting BTC volatility based on the leverage effect. Then, it compares the best GARCH-type model against the best ANN model with respect to short-term and long-term horizons. Results outline that APARCH, TGARCH and EGARCH are very sensitive to standardized residuals distributions, such that TGARCH run with the normal distribution is the best model that captures BTC volatility. Further, MLP outperforms all the parametric and nonparametric models, while its accuracy weakens with the level of forecasting horizons. Consequently, nonparametric models prevail parametric models in BTC volatility forecasting due to their high degree of flexibility and strong generalization abilities, whereas MLP is only effective in short-term forecasting.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 523
页数:13
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [71] Sarhani M, 2014, 2014 SECOND WORLD CONFERENCE ON COMPLEX SYSTEMS (WCCS), P79, DOI 10.1109/ICoCS.2014.7060941
  • [72] Is Bitcoin a hedge, a safe haven or a diversifier for oil price movements? A comparison with gold
    Selmi, Refk
    Mensi, Walid
    Hammoudeh, Shawkat
    Bouoiyour, Jamal
    [J]. ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2018, 74 : 787 - 801
  • [74] Is Bitcoin a better safe-haven investment than gold and commodities?
    Shahzad, Syed Jawad Hussain
    Bouri, Elie
    Roubaud, David
    Kristoufek, Ladislav
    Lucey, Brian
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 63 : 322 - 330
  • [75] Does twitter predict Bitcoin?
    Shen, Dehua
    Urquhart, Andrew
    Wang, Pengfei
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2019, 174 : 118 - 122
  • [76] The high frequency multifractal properties of Bitcoin
    Stavroyiannis, Stavros
    Babalos, Vassilios
    Bekiros, Stelios
    Lahmiri, Salim
    Uddin, Gazi Salah
    [J]. PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2019, 520 : 62 - 71
  • [77] Taylor effect in Bitcoin time series
    Takaishi, Tetsuya
    Adachi, Takanori
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2018, 172 : 5 - 7
  • [78] Informational efficiency of Bitcoin-An extension
    Tiwari, Aviral Kumar
    Jana, R. K.
    Das, Debojyoti
    Roubaud, David
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2018, 163 : 106 - 109
  • [79] What causes the attention of Bitcoin?
    Urquhart, Andrew
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2018, 166 : 40 - 44
  • [80] The inefficiency of Bitcoin
    Urquhart, Andrew
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2016, 148 : 80 - 82