Forecasting of BTC volatility: comparative study between parametric and nonparametric models

被引:12
作者
Khaldi, Rohaifa [1 ]
El Afia, Abdellatif [1 ]
Chiheb, Raddouane [1 ]
机构
[1] Mohammed V Univ, ENSIAS, Rabat, Morocco
关键词
Forecasting; Volatility; Bitcoin; GARCH-type models; ANN models; Time series; SAFE-HAVEN; BITCOIN; CRYPTOCURRENCIES; INEFFICIENCY; RETURNS; PREDICT;
D O I
10.1007/s13748-019-00196-w
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Bitcoin has rapidly gained much attention by media, investors and scholars, since it is widely used for investment purposes as an alternative to regular currencies. The price of bitcoin is characterized with high volatility, which makes firms that hold large amounts of it prone to risks. To prevent those risks and to gain insights into its behavior and trading strategies, it is necessary to forecast bitcoin volatility. In that context, this study reviews the impact of different factors on BTC price, returns and volatility. Moreover, it examines the sensitivity of GARCH family models to standardized residuals distributions in forecasting BTC volatility based on the leverage effect. Then, it compares the best GARCH-type model against the best ANN model with respect to short-term and long-term horizons. Results outline that APARCH, TGARCH and EGARCH are very sensitive to standardized residuals distributions, such that TGARCH run with the normal distribution is the best model that captures BTC volatility. Further, MLP outperforms all the parametric and nonparametric models, while its accuracy weakens with the level of forecasting horizons. Consequently, nonparametric models prevail parametric models in BTC volatility forecasting due to their high degree of flexibility and strong generalization abilities, whereas MLP is only effective in short-term forecasting.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 523
页数:13
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [61] The effects of markets, uncertainty and search intensity on bitcoin returns
    Panagiotidis, Theodore
    Stengos, Thanasis
    Vravosinos, Orestis
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF FINANCIAL ANALYSIS, 2019, 63 : 220 - 242
  • [62] Pedro Franco., 2014, Understanding Bitcoin, Cryptography Engineering and Economics
  • [63] The best of two worlds: Forecasting high frequency volatility for cryptocurrencies and traditional currencies with Support Vector Regression
    Peng, Yaohao
    Melo Albuquerque, Pedro Henrique
    Camboim de Sa, Jader Martins
    Akaishi Padula, Ana Julia
    Montenegro, Mariana Rosa
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2018, 97 : 177 - 192
  • [64] Pichl L, 2017, QUANT FINANC ECON, V1, P474, DOI 10.3934/QFE.2017.4.474
  • [65] Do Jumps Matter for Volatility Forecasting? Evidence from Energy Markets
    Prokopczuk, Marcel
    Symeonidis, Lazaros
    Simen, Chardin Wese
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FUTURES MARKETS, 2016, 36 (08) : 758 - 792
  • [66] Sarhani M., 2018, CONT APPROACHES STRA, P302, DOI DOI 10.4018/978-1-5225-5273-4.CH012
  • [67] Sarhani M., 2015, CEUR WORKSHOP P
  • [68] Sarhani M., 2017, INT J BIG DATA INTEL, V4, P141
  • [69] Sarhani M., 2017, ARTIF INTELL, V89, P2146, DOI 10.4018/978-1-5225-1759-7.ch089
  • [70] Sarhani M, 2016, 2016 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ELECTRICAL AND INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES (ICEIT), P288, DOI 10.1109/EITech.2016.7519608