Forecasting of BTC volatility: comparative study between parametric and nonparametric models

被引:12
作者
Khaldi, Rohaifa [1 ]
El Afia, Abdellatif [1 ]
Chiheb, Raddouane [1 ]
机构
[1] Mohammed V Univ, ENSIAS, Rabat, Morocco
关键词
Forecasting; Volatility; Bitcoin; GARCH-type models; ANN models; Time series; SAFE-HAVEN; BITCOIN; CRYPTOCURRENCIES; INEFFICIENCY; RETURNS; PREDICT;
D O I
10.1007/s13748-019-00196-w
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Bitcoin has rapidly gained much attention by media, investors and scholars, since it is widely used for investment purposes as an alternative to regular currencies. The price of bitcoin is characterized with high volatility, which makes firms that hold large amounts of it prone to risks. To prevent those risks and to gain insights into its behavior and trading strategies, it is necessary to forecast bitcoin volatility. In that context, this study reviews the impact of different factors on BTC price, returns and volatility. Moreover, it examines the sensitivity of GARCH family models to standardized residuals distributions in forecasting BTC volatility based on the leverage effect. Then, it compares the best GARCH-type model against the best ANN model with respect to short-term and long-term horizons. Results outline that APARCH, TGARCH and EGARCH are very sensitive to standardized residuals distributions, such that TGARCH run with the normal distribution is the best model that captures BTC volatility. Further, MLP outperforms all the parametric and nonparametric models, while its accuracy weakens with the level of forecasting horizons. Consequently, nonparametric models prevail parametric models in BTC volatility forecasting due to their high degree of flexibility and strong generalization abilities, whereas MLP is only effective in short-term forecasting.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 523
页数:13
相关论文
共 86 条
  • [1] What can explain the price, volatility and trading volume of Bitcoin?
    Aalborg, Halvor Aarhus
    Molnar, Peter
    de Vries, Jon Erik
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 29 : 255 - 265
  • [2] Do bitcoins follow a random walk model?
    Aggarwal, Divya
    [J]. RESEARCH IN ECONOMICS, 2019, 73 (01) : 15 - 22
  • [3] Bitcoin and the day-of-the-week effect
    Aharon, David Yechiam
    Qadan, Mahmoud
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 31 : 415 - 424
  • [4] Alex G., 2015, USING BITCOIN T GRAP
  • [5] Answering the skeptics: Yes, standard volatility models do provide accurate forecasts
    Andersen, TG
    Bollerslev, T
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1998, 39 (04) : 885 - 905
  • [6] Bitcoin price forecasting with neuro-fuzzy techniques
    Atsalakis, George S.
    Atsalaki, Loanna G.
    Pasiouras, Fotios
    Zopounidis, Constantin
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2019, 276 (02) : 770 - 780
  • [7] Effects of the geopolitical risks on Bitcoin returns and volatility
    Aysan, Ahmet Faruk
    Demir, Ender
    Gozgor, Giray
    Lau, Chi Keung Marco
    [J]. RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2019, 47 : 511 - 518
  • [8] Price clustering and sentiment in bitcoin
    Baig, Ahmed
    Blau, Benjamin M.
    Sabah, Nasim
    [J]. FINANCE RESEARCH LETTERS, 2019, 29 : 111 - 116
  • [9] Can volume predict Bitcoin returns and volatility? A quantiles-based approach
    Balcilar, Mehmet
    Bouri, Elie
    Gupta, Rangan
    Roubaud, David
    [J]. ECONOMIC MODELLING, 2017, 64 : 74 - 81
  • [10] The inefficiency of Bitcoin revisited: A dynamic approach
    Bariviera, Aurelio F.
    [J]. ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2017, 161 : 1 - 4