Lack of progress in early diagnosis of bladder cancer

被引:17
作者
Araki, Motoo [1 ]
Nieder, Alan M. [1 ]
Manoharan, Murugesan [1 ]
Yang, Yulong [1 ]
Soloway, Mark S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Miami, Miller Sch Med, Dept Urol, Miami Beach, FL 33140 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.urology.2006.10.016
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVES The stage of presentation of prostate cancer has changed dramatically in the past two decades, largely because of prostate-specific antigen screening and increased public awareness regarding the disease. Recently, strides have been made in the validation, development, and approval of bladder cancer (BC) markers. We sought to evaluate whether any stage migration has occurred for patients with BC during the same period. METHODS A total of 351 and 1262 patients underwent radical cystectomy and radical retropubic prostatectomy, respectively, between 1992 and 2005 by one surgeon. The patients were divided into two consecutive groups: group 1 (1992 to 1998) and group 2 (1999 to 2005). The baseline and pathologic characteristics of the patients were compared. RESULTS No differences were found in the clinical or pathologic staging between the two groups of patients undergoing radical cystectomy. The 5-year overall and disease-specific survival also was not different between the two groups. For patients with prostate cancer, those in group 2 presented at a younger age, with a lower prostate-specific antigen level, and had a lower clinical stage. Group 2 patients had a decrease in the incidence of extracapsular extension, a decreased tumor volume, and a decrease in the incidence of Gleason 8 to 10 tumors. CONCLUSIONS During two consecutive periods, our patients with prostate cancer presented with the cancer at an earlier stage and had more favorable pathologic features after radical retropubic prostatectomy. However, our patients with BC did not demonstrate any stage migration. Physicians need to be more aggressive in diagnosing BC, especially in patients at high risk of the disease. Risk factors must be emphasized, urine markers should be used in a screening strategy, and the indications for radical cystectomy should be liberalized.
引用
收藏
页码:270 / 274
页数:5
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   RADICAL CYSTECTOMY FOR STAGE-TA, STAGE-TIS AND STAGE-T1 TRANSITIONAL-CELL CARCINOMA OF THE BLADDER [J].
AMLING, CL ;
THRASHER, JB ;
FRAZIER, HA ;
DODGE, RK ;
ROBERTSON, JE ;
PAULSON, DF .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1994, 151 (01) :31-36
[2]  
BADALAMENT RA, 1987, CANCER, V59, P2078, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19870615)59:12<2078::AID-CNCR2820591219>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-P
[4]   Evaluation of nuclear matrix protein-22 as a clinical diagnostic marker for bladder cancer [J].
Chang, YH ;
Wu, CH ;
Lee, YL ;
Huang, PH ;
Kao, YL ;
Shiau, MY .
UROLOGY, 2004, 64 (04) :687-692
[5]   TOBACCO AND BLADDER-CANCER IN MALES - INCREASED RISK FOR INHALERS AND SMOKERS OF BLACK TOBACCO [J].
CLAVEL, J ;
CORDIER, S ;
BOCCONGIBOD, L ;
HEMON, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1989, 44 (04) :605-610
[6]   Changing prostate-specific antigen outcome after surgery or radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer during the prostate-specific antigen era [J].
D'Amico, AV ;
Chen, MH ;
Oh-Ung, J ;
Renshaw, AA ;
Cote, K ;
Loffredo, M ;
Richie, JP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 54 (02) :436-441
[7]  
FREEMAN JA, 1995, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V76, P833, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19950901)76:5<833::AID-CNCR2820760518>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-M
[9]   A comparison of cytology and fluorescence in situ hybridization for the detection of urothelial carcinoma [J].
Halling, KC ;
King, W ;
Sokolova, IA ;
Meyer, RG ;
Burkhardt, HM ;
Halling, AC ;
Cheville, JC ;
Sebo, TJ ;
Ramakumar, S ;
Stewart, CS ;
Pankratz, S ;
O'Kane, DJ ;
Seelig, SA ;
Lieber, MM ;
Jenkins, RB .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2000, 164 (05) :1768-1775
[10]   Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer [J].
Han, M ;
Partin, AW ;
Zahurak, M ;
Piantadosi, S ;
Epstein, JI ;
Walsh, PC .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (02) :517-523