University teachers' conceptions of their current and ideal intermediate assessment: an A plus is good, but speaking your mind is better

被引:2
作者
Day, Indira N. Z. [1 ]
van Blankenstein, F. M. [1 ]
Westenberg, P. M. [2 ]
Admiraal, W. F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Leiden Univ, Grad Sch Teaching, ICLON, POB 905, NL-2300 AX Leiden, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Inst Psychol, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
Conceptions of assessment; intermediate assessment; continuous assessment; university teachers; interviews;
D O I
10.1080/03075079.2018.1483326
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Assessment in higher education with a transformational instead of a reproductive purpose can be a powerful way of supporting student learning. Since university teachers usually design their own assessments, it is important to investigate their conceptions of assessment. The current study focuses on teachers' conceptions of their current and ideal assessment with a focus on intermediate assessment. Thirteen teachers teaching law, psychology and criminology, reflected on their current and ideal assessment in an attempt to eliminate the influence of practical constraints on assessment practice. Results indicate that the majority of teachers have transformational conceptions of their intermediate assessment practice, and in general, their conceptions of the ideal assessment are even more transformational. This suggests that teachers' main focus for assessment is on student learning and that a lack of transformational assessments in practice may be mainly caused by external constraints.
引用
收藏
页码:2223 / 2234
页数:12
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Reconceptualising assessment feedback: a key to improving student learning? [J].
Beaumont, Chris ;
O'Doherty, Michelle ;
Shannon, Lee .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 36 (06) :671-687
[2]   Formative assessment: a critical review [J].
Bennett, Randy .
ASSESSMENT IN EDUCATION-PRINCIPLES POLICY & PRACTICE, 2011, 18 (01) :5-25
[3]  
Black P., 1998, Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, V5, P7, DOI [DOI 10.1080/0969595980050102, 10.1080/0969595980050102]
[4]  
Black P., 2004, YB NATL SOC STUDY ED, V103, P20, DOI [DOI 10.1111/j.1744-7984.2004.tb00047.x, 10.1111/j.1744-7984.2004.tb00047.x, DOI 10.1111/J.1744-7984.2004.TB00047.X]
[5]   Developing the theory of formative assessment [J].
Black, Paul ;
Wiliam, Dylan .
EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT EVALUATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY, 2009, 21 (01) :5-31
[6]   A review of the characteristics of intermediate assessment and their relationship with student grades [J].
Day, Indira N. Z. ;
van Blankenstein, Floris M. ;
Westenberg, Michiel ;
Admiraal, Wilfried .
ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2018, 43 (06) :908-929
[7]   Teacher and student perceptions of intermediate assessment in higher education [J].
Day, Indira N. Z. ;
van Blankenstein, F. M. ;
Westenberg, P. Michiel ;
Admiraal, W. F. .
EDUCATIONAL STUDIES, 2018, 44 (04) :449-467
[8]  
Gibbs G., 2005, LEARNING TEACHING HI, P3, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-8348-9837-1
[9]   Assessment as an equity issue in higher education: comparing the perceptions of first year students, course coordinators, and academic leaders [J].
Goos, Merrilyn ;
Gannaway, Deanne ;
Hughes, Clair .
AUSTRALIAN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHER, 2011, 38 (01) :95-107
[10]  
Kingston N., 2011, Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, V30, P28, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1745-3992.2011.00220.X