Insights into Blockchain Implementation in Construction: Models for Supply Chain Management

被引:91
作者
Tezel, Algan [1 ]
Febrero, Pedro [2 ]
Papadonikolaki, Eleni [3 ]
Yitmen, Ibrahim [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Huddersfield, Sch Art Design & Architecture, Huddersfield HD1 3DH, W Yorkshire, England
[2] Bityond Inc, Ave Duque Avila 185,5 Andar, P-1050082 Lisbon, Portugal
[3] UCL, Bartlett Sch Construct & Project Management, 251 1-19 Torrington Pl, London WC1E 7HB, England
[4] Jonkoping Univ, Dept Construct Engn & Lighting Sci, Karrhoksgatan 86, S-55612 Jonkoping, Sweden
基金
“创新英国”项目;
关键词
Blockchain; Construction; Supply chain management; Models; Ethereum; DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH; INFORMATION; TECHNOLOGY; INTEGRATION; PROJECTS; INDUSTRY;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)ME.1943-5479.0000939
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The interest in the implementation of distributed ledger technologies (DLTs) is on the rise in the construction sector. One specific type of DLT that has recently attracted much attention is blockchain. Blockchain has been mostly discussed conceptually for construction to date. This study presents some empirical discussions on supply chain management (SCM) applications of blockchain for construction by collecting feedback for three blockchain-based models: project bank accounts (PBAs) for payments, reverse auction-based tendering for bidding, and asset tokenization for project financing. The feedback was collected from three focus groups and a workshop. The working prototypes for the models were developed on Ethereum. The implementation of blockchain in payment arrangements was found to be simpler than in tendering and project tokenization workflows. However, the blockchain integration of those workflows may have large-scale impacts on the sector in the future. A broad set of general and model-specific benefits/opportunities and requirements/challenges was also identified for blockchain in construction. Some of these include streamlined, transparent transactions and rational trust building, and the need for challenging the sector culture, upscaling the legacy information technology (IT) systems, and compliance with the regulatory structures.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]   Why do businesses go crypto? An empirical analysis of initial coin offerings [J].
Adhami, Saman ;
Giudici, Giancarlo ;
Martinazzi, Stefano .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS AND BUSINESS, 2018, 100 :64-75
[2]   A smart contract system for security of payment of construction contracts [J].
Ahmadisheykhsarmast, Salar ;
Sonmez, Rifat .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2020, 120
[3]   Procurement Issues in Donor-Funded International Development Projects [J].
Ahsan, Kamrul ;
Paul, Sanjoy Kumar .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2018, 34 (06)
[4]   State of Private Financing in Development of Highway Projects in the United States [J].
Ashuri, Baabak ;
Mostaan, Kia .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2015, 31 (06)
[5]   Comparing the Impact of Learning in Bidding Decision-Making Processes Using Algorithmic Game Theory [J].
Assaad, Rayan ;
Ahmed, Muaz O. ;
El-adaway, Islam H. ;
Elsayegh, Amr ;
Nadendla, Venkata Sriram Siddhardh .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT IN ENGINEERING, 2021, 37 (01)
[6]   A Survey of Attacks on Ethereum Smart Contracts (SoK) [J].
Atzei, Nicola ;
Bartoletti, Massimo ;
Cimoli, Tiziana .
PRINCIPLES OF SECURITY AND TRUST (POST 2017), 2017, 10204 :164-186
[7]   Technological, organisational and environmental determinants of smart contracts adoption: UK construction sector viewpoint [J].
Badi, Sulafa ;
Ochieng, Edward ;
Nasaj, Mohamed ;
Papadaki, Maria .
CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT AND ECONOMICS, 2021, 39 (01) :36-54
[8]  
Barbosa F., 2017, Reinventing Construction: A Route of Higher Productivity
[9]  
Barima O., 2017, Construction Projects, P93
[10]   Crowdfunding: Tapping the right crowd [J].
Belleflamme, Paul ;
Lambert, Thomas ;
Schwienbacher, Armin .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS VENTURING, 2014, 29 (05) :585-609