University-industry collaboration within the triple helix of innovation: The importance of mutuality

被引:15
作者
Jackson, Paul [1 ]
Mavi, Reza Kiani [1 ]
Suseno, Yuliani [1 ]
Standing, Craig [1 ]
机构
[1] Edith Cowan Univ, Sch Business & Law, Ctr Innovat Practice, 270 Joondalup Dr, Joondalup, WA 6027, Australia
关键词
triple helix; collaboration; national innovation systems; TECHNOLOGY; SYSTEMS; POLICY; ORGANIZATION; MANAGEMENT; GOVERNMENT; DYNAMICS; MODES;
D O I
10.1093/scipol/scx083
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This article was triggered by the observation that not only are there very low rates of collaboration between Australian firms and universities, but that there are similarly low rates of collaboration between Australian firms, their clients and suppliers. This suggests that the lack of collaboration with universities may be caused by something within the firm context, rather than specific difficulties in the relationship between firms and universities. Using OECD data, we found a general correlation between firm firm collaboration and firm-university collaboration. After cluster analysis of national collaboration rates, we compared Australia with the UK. We found the most significant variation in collaboration occurs within the dimension of mutuality: what is to be gained by both parties. Mutuality is most common within a diverse economy with complex manufacturing and supply chains, and consequently higher levels of knowledge intensity. Our results suggest these are the key differences in driving collaboration for innovation.
引用
收藏
页码:553 / 564
页数:12
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], SUPPL MAN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1996, CREATING COLLABORATI
[3]  
[Anonymous], 81580 AUSTR BUR STAT
[4]  
[Anonymous], INF WORKSH NAT INN S
[5]  
[Anonymous], NAT INN SCI AG
[6]  
[Anonymous], KNOWLEDGE FLOWS EURO
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, OECD Science, Technology and Industry Scoreboard 2013: Innovation for Growth, DOI 10.1787/sti_scoreboard-2013-en
[8]  
[Anonymous], ATLAS EC COMPLEXITY
[9]  
[Anonymous], AUSTR INN SYST REP 2
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2007, CULTURE LEADERSHIP W