Polyethylene glycol hydrogel rectal spacer implantation in patients with prostate cancer undergoing combination high-dose-rate brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy

被引:34
|
作者
Yeh, Jekwon [1 ]
Lehrich, Brandon [1 ]
Tran, Carolyn [1 ]
Mesa, Albert [1 ]
Baghdassarian, Ruben [1 ]
Yoshida, Jeffrey [1 ]
Torrey, Robert [1 ]
Gazzaniga, Michael [1 ]
Weinberg, Alan [1 ]
Chaffin, Stuart [1 ]
Ravera, John [1 ]
Tokita, Kenneth [1 ]
机构
[1] Canc Ctr Irvine, Dept Radiat Oncol, 16100 Sand Canyon 130, Irvine, CA 92618 USA
关键词
Prostate; Cancer; Rectal; Spacer; Toxicity; Brachytherapy; Radiation; IMRT; HDR; TRIAL; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.brachy.2015.12.007
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: To present rectal toxicity rates in patients administered a polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel rectal spacer in conjunction with combination high-dose-rate brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between February 2010 and April 2015, 326 prostate carcinoma patients underwent combination high-dose-rate brachytherapy of 16 Gy (average dose 15.5 Gy; standard deviation [SD] = 1.6 Gy) and external beam radiotherapy of 59.4 Gy (average dose 60.2 Gy; SD = 2.9 Gy). In conjunction with the radiation therapy regimen, each patient was injected with 10 mL of a PEG hydrogel in the anterior perirectal fat space. The injectable spacer (rectal spacer) creates a gap between the prostate and the rectum. The rectum is displaced from the radiation field, and rectal dose is substantially reduced. The goal is a reduction in rectal radiation toxicity. Clinical efficacy was determined by measuring acute and chronic rectal toxicity using the National Cancer Center Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0 grading scheme. RESULTS: Median followup was 16 months. The mean anterior posterior separation achieved was 1.6 cm (SD = 0.4 cm). Rates of acute Grade 1 and 2 rectal toxicity were 37.4% and 2.8%, respectively. There were no acute Grade 3/4 toxicities. Rates of late Grade 1, 2, and 3 rectal toxicity were 12.7%, 1.4%, and 0.7%, respectively. There were no late Grade 4 toxicities. CONCLUSIONS: PEG rectal spacer implantation is safe and well tolerated. Acute and chronic rectal toxicities are low despite aggressive dose escalation. (C) 2016 American Brachytherapy Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 287
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy for prostate cancer persistence after brachytherapy: repeated use of a polyethylene glycol hydrogel spacer
    Hepp, Rodrigo
    Eggert, Thilo
    Schabl, Georg
    Herberholz, Lars
    Petry, Tim
    Galalae, Razvan
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2018, 10 (02) : 169 - 173
  • [2] High-dose-rate brachytherapy in combination with conformal external beam radiotherapy in the treatment of prostate cancer
    Zwahlen, Daniel R.
    Andrianopoulos, Nick
    Matheson, Bronwyn
    Duchesne, Gillian M.
    Millar, Jeremy L.
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2010, 9 (01) : 27 - 35
  • [3] Improving rectal dosimetry for patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer undergoing combined high-dose-rate brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy with hydrogel space
    Chao, Michael
    Ow, Darren
    Ho, Huong
    Chan, Yee
    Joon, Daryl Lim
    Spencer, Sandra
    Lawrentschuk, Nathan
    Guerrieri, Mario
    Pham, Trung
    McMillan, Kevin
    Tan, Alwin
    Foroudi, Farshad
    Tang, Johann
    Wasiak, Jason
    Liu, Madalena
    Koufogiannis, George
    Cham, Chee Wee
    Bolton, Damien
    JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY BRACHYTHERAPY, 2019, 11 (01) : 8 - 13
  • [4] Low and high-dose-rate brachytherapy in combination with external beam radiotherapy for high risk prostate cancer
    Solodkiy, V. A.
    Pavlov, A. Yu
    Tsibulskii, A. D.
    Panshin, G. A.
    Dzidzaria, A. G.
    Mirzahanov, R., I
    ONKOUROLOGIYA, 2021, 17 (02): : 72 - 82
  • [5] A dosimetric analysis of rectal hydrogel spacer use in patients with recurrent prostate cancer undergoing salvage high-dose-rate brachytherapy
    Lee, Charles T.
    Koleoso, Olufela
    Deng, Mengying
    Veltchev, Iavor
    Lin, Teh
    Hallman, Mark A.
    Horwitz, Eric M.
    Wong, J. Karen
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2023, 22 (05) : 586 - 592
  • [6] Clinical outcomes of high-dose-rate brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy in the management of clinically localized prostate cancer
    Kotecha, Rupesh
    Yamada, Yoshiya
    Pei, Xin
    Kollmeier, Marisa A.
    Cox, Brett
    Cohen, Gil'ad N.
    Zaider, Marco
    Zelefsky, Michael J.
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2013, 12 (01) : 44 - 49
  • [7] The impact of a rectal hydrogel spacer on dosimetric and toxicity outcomes among patients undergoing combination therapy with external beam radiotherapy and low-dose-rate brachytherapy
    Nehlsen, Anthony D.
    Sindhu, Kunal K.
    Moshier, Erin
    Sfakianos, John P.
    Stock, Richard G.
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2021, 20 (02) : 296 - 301
  • [8] Four-year outcomes of hypofractionated high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy
    Chen, William C.
    Tokita, Kenneth M.
    Ravera, John
    Fu, Pingfu
    Jiang, Ying
    Kaminsky, Deborah A.
    Ponsky, Lee
    Ellis, Rodney J.
    BRACHYTHERAPY, 2013, 12 (05) : 422 - 427
  • [9] A dosimetric study of polyethylene glycol hydrogel in 200 prostate cancer patients treated with high-dose rate brachytherapy ± intensity modulated radiation therapy
    Strom, Tobin J.
    Wilder, Richard B.
    Fernandez, Daniel C.
    Mellon, Eric A.
    Saini, Amarjit S.
    Hunt, Dylan C.
    Pow-Sang, Julio M.
    Spiess, Phillipe E.
    Sexton, Wade J.
    Poch, Michael A.
    Biagioli, Matthew C.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2014, 111 (01) : 126 - 131
  • [10] Long-term clinical outcomes of 538 prostate carcinoma patients treated with combination high-dose-rate brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy
    Lehrich, Brandon M.
    Ravera, John
    Mostaghni, Navid
    Yoshida, Jeffrey
    Torrey, Robert
    Baghdassarian, Ruben
    Gazzaniga, Michael
    Weinberg, Alan
    Cu Phan
    Chalfin, Stuart
    Barnes, Lucy
    Mesa, Albert
    Tokita, Kenneth
    JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 8 (03) : 311 - 321