Environmental Impact of Ground Source Heat Pump Systems: A Comparative Investigation From South to North Europe

被引:14
作者
Aresti, Lazaros [1 ]
Florides, Georgios A. [1 ]
Skaliontas, Andreas [2 ]
Christodoulides, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Cyprus Univ Technol, Fac Engn & Technol, Limassol, Cyprus
[2] Cyprus Univ Technol, Dept Elect Engn Comp Engn & Informat, Limassol, Cyprus
关键词
GSHP; environmental impact; GHE; openLCA; geothermal energy; LCA; CO2 payback period; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; MULTICRITERIA EVALUATION; PERFORMANCE; BUILDINGS; EXCHANGERS; LCA;
D O I
10.3389/fbuil.2022.914227
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Ground Heat Exchangers (GHEs), buried in the ground either horizontally or vertically (in a borehole), are coupled with a heat pump to form a Ground Source Heat Pump (GSHP) system, which is a type of Renewable Energy System that exploits geothermal energy for space heating and cooling. GSHP systems are proposed as an alternative to conventional Air Source Heat Pumps (ASHPs) as they exhibit a higher efficiency. In this study, this difference in efficiency is tested in order to determine how the systems perform in terms of environmental impact. Three types of GSHP systems (with different GHE configuration), each compared to ASHPs, undergo a Life Cycle Analysis using the ReCiPe method from both mid-point and end-point perspectives. The heating and cooling loads required for a single residential building of area 220 m(2), with nearly Zero Energy Building technical characteristics, is used as a Functional Unit, for seven cases (locations/countries) from South to North Europe. Additionally, a Simple Payback Period method is employed to investigate the CO2 payback time for the GSHPs. It is concluded that the use of GSHP systems in residential buildings, even with nZEB (nearly Zero Energy Buildings) characteristics of low heating/cooling demand, can be a more environmentally friendly solution than that of an ASHP system, depending on the factors affecting the system, namely the ground thermal characteristics, the heating/cooling demand, the heating/cooling peak loads and electricity mix.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Acero AP., 2016, LCIA methods-Impact assessment methods in Life Cycle Assessment and their impact categories"
[2]   Multi-criteria evaluation of residential energy supply systems [J].
Alanne, Kari ;
Salo, Ahti ;
Saari, Arto ;
Gustafsson, Stig-Inge .
ENERGY AND BUILDINGS, 2007, 39 (12) :1218-1226
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, SCI BACKGR
[4]   An investigation on the environmental impact of various Ground Heat Exchangers configurations [J].
Aresti, Lazaros ;
Christodoulides, Paul ;
Florides, Georgios A. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2021, 171 :592-605
[5]   Residential Buildings' Foundations as a Ground Heat Exchanger and Comparison among Different Types in a Moderate Climate Country † [J].
Aresti, Lazaros ;
Christodoulides, Paul ;
Panayiotou, Gregoris P. ;
Florides, Georgios .
ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (23)
[6]   A review of the design aspects of ground heat exchangers [J].
Aresti, Lazaros ;
Christodoulides, Paul ;
Florides, Georgios .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2018, 92 :757-773
[7]   Selection of a Hybrid Renewable Energy Systems for a Low-Income Household [J].
Babatunde, Olubayo M. ;
Munda, Josiah L. ;
Hamam, Yskandar .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (16)
[8]   Environmental and Economic Impact of the Antifreeze Agents in Geothermal Heat Exchangers [J].
Bartolini, Nicola ;
Casasso, Alessandro ;
Bianco, Carlo ;
Sethi, Rajandrea .
ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (21)
[9]   Are district heating systems and renewable energy sources always an environmental win-win solution? A life cycle assessment case study in Tuscany, Italy [J].
Bartolozzi, Irene ;
Rizzi, Francesco ;
Frey, Marco .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2017, 80 :408-420
[10]   Greenhouse gas emission savings of ground source heat pump systems in Europe: A review [J].
Bayer, Peter ;
Saner, Dominik ;
Bolay, Stephan ;
Rybach, Ladislaus ;
Blum, Philipp .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2012, 16 (02) :1256-1267