A multimodal communication program for aphasia during inpatient rehabilitation: A case study

被引:14
作者
Wallace, Sarah E. [1 ]
Purdy, Mary [2 ]
Skidmore, Elizabeth [3 ]
机构
[1] Duquesne Univ, Dept Speech Language Pathol, Pittsburgh, PA 15282 USA
[2] So Connecticut State Univ, Commun Disorders Dept, New Haven, CT 06515 USA
[3] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Occupat Therapy, Pittsburgh, PA USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Aphasia; acute rehabilitation; multimodal treatment; stroke; PEOPLE; GESTURE; EFFICACY; THERAPY; MODELS; ADULTS; SKILLS; SET;
D O I
10.3233/NRE-141136
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Communication is essential for successful rehabilitation, yet few aphasia treatments have been investigated during the acute stroke phase. Alternative modality use including gesturing, writing, or drawing has been shown to increase communicative effectiveness in people with chronic aphasia. Instruction in alternative modality use during acute stroke may increase patient communication and participation, therefore resulting in fewer adverse situations and improved rehabilitation outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The study purpose was to explore a multimodal communication program for aphasia (MCPA) implemented during acute stroke rehabilitation. MCPA aims to improve communication modality production, and to facilitate switching among modalities to resolve communication breakdowns. METHODS: Two adults with severe aphasia completed MCPA beginning at 2 and 3 weeks post onset a single left-hemisphere stroke. Probes completed during each session allowed for evaluation of modality production and modality switching accuracy. RESULTS: Participants completed MCPA (10 and 14 treatment sessions respectively) and their performance on probes suggested increased accuracy in the production of various alternate communication modalities. However, increased switching to an alternate modality was noted for only one participant. CONCLUSIONS: Further investigation of multimodal treatment during inpatient rehabilitation is warranted. In particular, comparisons between multimodal and standard treatments would help determine appropriate interventions for this setting.
引用
收藏
页码:615 / 625
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INT J SPEECH LANGUAG
[2]  
[Anonymous], 107 WAYN STAT U
[3]  
Barresi S., 2001, Boston diagnostic aphasia examination, V3rd ed.
[4]   Writing treatment for severe aphasia: Who benefits? [J].
Beeson, PM ;
Rising, K ;
Volk, J .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2003, 46 (05) :1038-1060
[5]   Efficacy of early cognitive-linguistic treatment and communicative treatment in aphasia after stroke: a randomised controlled trial (RATS-2) [J].
de Jong-Hagelstein, M. ;
van de Sandt-Koenderman, W. M. E. ;
Prins, N. D. ;
Dippel, D. W. J. ;
Koudstaal, P. J. ;
Visch-Brink, E. G. .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY NEUROSURGERY AND PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 82 (04) :399-404
[6]   Models of errors of omission in aphasic naming [J].
Dell, GS ;
Lawler, EN ;
Harris, HD ;
Gordon, JK .
COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 21 (2-4) :125-145
[7]  
Downey D., 2006, Perspectives on Augmentative and Alternate Communication, V15, P3
[8]   A Comparison of Intention and Pantomime Gesture Treatment for Noun Retrieval in People With Aphasia [J].
Ferguson, Neina F. ;
Evans, Kelli ;
Raymer, Anastasia M. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2012, 21 (02) :S126-S139
[9]  
Francis W. N., 1982, Frequency analysis of English usage
[10]  
Garrett KL, 2000, AUG ALTER COMMUN SER, P339