Method Variance From the Perspectives of Reviewers: Poorly Understood Problem or Overemphasized Complaint?

被引：43

作者：

Pace, Victoria L. ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Florida Int Univ, Dept Psychol, Miami, FL 33199 USA

来源：

ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS | 2010年 / 13卷 / 03期

关键词：

method variance & quantitative research; survey research & quantitative research; research design; SELF-REPORTED AFFECT; ORGANIZATIONAL-BEHAVIOR RESEARCH; NEGATIVE AFFECTIVITY; PERCEPTIONS; WORK; STRESSORS; ARTIFACT; MATRICES; STRAINS; MODELS;

D O I：

10.1177/1094428109351751

中图分类号：

B849 [应用心理学];

学科分类号：

040203 ;

摘要：

Beliefs and practices regarding common method variance (CMV) were surveyed from a sample of top journal board members. Results indicated that reviewers frequently mentioned CMV concerns and believed that addressing this issue in the design stage was more effective than postdata approaches. Although there was little consensus regarding whether concerns about CMV would cause them to recommend rejection of manuscripts, reviewers generally agreed that some variables were more likely than others to be affected by CMV and that a simple focus on the method of measurement was not adequate for determining whether CMV caused problems with the interpretation of study results. Slight differences were observed across journals and were related to participant experience.

引用

页码：421 / 434

页数：14

共 22 条

[1] ASSESSING METHOD VARIANCE IN MULTITRAIT MULTIMETHOD MATRICES - THE CASE OF SELF-REPORTED AFFECT AND PERCEPTIONS AT WORK [J].

BAGOZZI, RP ;

YI, YJ .

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 75 (05) :547-560

[2]

BECKER TE, 1994, J MANAGE, V20, P625, DOI 10.1177/014920639402000306

[3] THE ROLE OF NEGATIVE AFFECTIVITY IN UNDERSTANDING RELATIONS BETWEEN SELF-REPORTS OF STRESSORS AND STRAINS - A COMMENT ON THE APPLIED-PSYCHOLOGY LITERATURE [J].

BURKE, MJ ;

BRIEF, AP ;

GEORGE, JM .

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 78 (03) :402-412

[4] CONVERGENT AND DISCRIMINANT VALIDATION BY THE MULTITRAIT-MULTIMETHOD MATRIX [J].

CAMPBELL, DT ;

FISKE, DW .

PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1959, 56 (02) :81-105

[5] Understanding method variance in Multitrait-Multirater performance appraisal matrices: Examples using general impressions and interpersonal affect as measured method factors [J].

Conway, JM .

HUMAN PERFORMANCE, 1998, 11 (01) :29-55

[6] Common Methods Bias: Does Common Methods Variance Really Bias Results? [J].

Doty, D. Harold ;

Glick, William H. .

ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS, 1998, 1 (04) :374-406

[7] THEORY AND TECHNIQUES OF PERSONALITY MEASUREMENT [J].

FISKE, DW ;

PEARSON, PH .

ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1970, 21 :49-+

[8]

GOLDING SL, 1977, J MULTIVARIATE BEHAV, V12, P89

[9] The effect of physical height on workplace success and income: Preliminary test of a theoretical model [J].

Judge, TA ;

Cable, DM .

JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 89 (03) :428-441

[10] A METAANALYTIC REVIEW AND EMPIRICAL-TEST OF THE POTENTIAL CONFOUNDING EFFECTS OF SOCIAL DESIRABILITY RESPONSE SETS IN ORGANIZATIONAL-BEHAVIOR RESEARCH [J].

MOORMAN, RH ;

PODSAKOFF, PM .

JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ORGANIZATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 65 :131-149

← 1 2 3 →