Investigating Consumer Preferences for Production Process Labeling Using Visual Attention Data

被引:6
作者
Wei, Xuan [1 ]
Khachatryan, Hayk [2 ,3 ]
Rihn, Alicia L. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Midflorida Res & Educ Ctr, Apopka, FL 32703 USA
[2] Univ Florida, Dept Food & Resource Econ, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
[3] Univ Florida, Midflorida Res & Educ Ctr, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
visual fixations; total visit duration; visual fixation duration; neonicotinoid labels; second-price auctions; gaze cascade effect; ATTRIBUTE NON-ATTENDANCE; WILLINGNESS-TO-PAY; DISCRETE-CHOICE EXPERIMENTS; EYE-TRACKING; SUSTAINABILITY LABELS; CONJOINT-ANALYSIS; DECISION-MAKING; VALUATION; MODEL; RATIONALITY;
D O I
10.3390/bs9070071
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A second-price auction with eye movement recordings was used to investigate consumer preferences for labels disclosing the presence and absence of specific types of insecticides and to explore the relationship between visual attention and consumer purchasing behaviors. Findings contribute to the literature in the following ways. First, visual attention pattern was endogenously determined by personal knowledge and pollinator conservation activities. Less knowledgeable or less engaged participants fixated more and for longer durations on the product as a whole rather than other information. Secondly, the first and last gaze cascade effect was confirmed by identifying a significant negative impact of participants' first and last gaze visits on neonicotinoid labels on their bid values. Third, new evidence was added to the existing literature that the link between visual attention and consumer valuation and preference may be weak. Our results suggest that visual attention could provide useful information toward understanding participants' bidding behaviors; however, evidence indicates that visual attention measures may not be directly linked with decision making.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文
共 88 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2019, CONSERV BIOL, DOI [DOI 10.3390/SU9101743, DOI 10.1111/cobi.13363]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data
[3]   Influence of rational and intuitive thinking styles on food choice: Preliminary evidence from an eye-tracking study with yogurt labels [J].
Ares, Gaston ;
Mawad, Franco ;
Gimenez, Ana ;
Maiche, Alejandro .
FOOD QUALITY AND PREFERENCE, 2014, 31 :28-37
[4]   Consumer Visual Processing of Food Labels: Results from an Eye-Tracking Study [J].
Ares, Gaston ;
Gimenez, Ana ;
Bruzzone, Fernanda ;
Vidal, Leticia ;
Antunez, Lucia ;
Maiche, Alejandro .
JOURNAL OF SENSORY STUDIES, 2013, 28 (02) :138-153
[5]  
Armel KC, 2008, JUDGM DECIS MAK, V3, P396
[6]   Shining in the Center: Central Gaze Cascade Effect on Product Choice [J].
Atalay, A. Selin ;
Bodur, H. Onur ;
Rasolofoarison, Dina .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2012, 39 (04) :848-866
[7]   Examining the relationship between visual attention and stated preferences: A discrete choice experiment using eye-tracking [J].
Balcombe, Kelvin ;
Fraser, Iain ;
Williams, Louis ;
McSorley, Eugene .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 2017, 144 :238-257
[8]   VISUAL ATTENTION AND ATTRIBUTE ATTENDANCE IN MULTI-ATTRIBUTE CHOICE EXPERIMENTS [J].
Balcombe, Kelvin ;
Fraser, Iain ;
McSorley, Eugene .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECONOMETRICS, 2015, 30 (03) :447-467
[9]  
Baumeister RF., 2001, Review of General Psychology, V5, P323, DOI [10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323, DOI 10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323]
[10]   Incorporating Eye Tracking Technology and Conjoint Analysis to Better Understand the Green Industry. Consumer [J].
Behe, Bridget K. ;
Campbell, Benjamin L. ;
Khachatryan, Hayk ;
Hall, Charles R. ;
Dennis, Jennifer H. ;
Huddleston, Patricia T. ;
Fernandez, R. Thomas .
HORTSCIENCE, 2014, 49 (12) :1550-1557