Topology optimization with multiple phase projection

被引:177
作者
Guest, James K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Baltimore, MD 21218 USA
关键词
Minimum length scale; Manufacturability; Filters; Projection functions; Heaviside Projection Method; SIMP; MINIMUM LENGTH SCALE; DESIGN; SCHEME;
D O I
10.1016/j.cma.2009.09.023
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Topology optimization is a powerful tool capable of generating new solutions to engineering design problems. While these designs may offer optimal performance in a computational setting, it is not uncommon for them to be impractical or unrealizable from engineering or fabrication points-of-view. This challenge motivates the present work. A methodology is proposed for restricting the minimum length scale of each material phase used in the design. The technique allows a designer to, for example, prescribe a minimum allowable length scale of structural members (solid phase) as well as the minimum allowable length scale on holes (void phase). The proposed approach utilizes the Heaviside Projection Method (HPM) to continuum topology optimization. Each material phase is associated with a design variable field that is projected onto element space using regularized Heaviside functions. The fields are independently projected and the resulting distributions are assembled to yield topology. The technique is demonstrated on classic topology optimization problems including minimum compliance, heat conduction, and compliant mechanisms. Solutions are shown to be near-discrete topologies satisfying minimum length scale criterion placed on each phase. Control over length scale is achieved implicitly and therefore the technique does not require additional constraints. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:123 / 135
页数:13
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   A simple and effective inverse projection scheme for void distribution control in topology optimization [J].
Almeida, S. R. M. ;
Paulino, G. H. ;
Silva, E. C. N. .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2009, 39 (04) :359-371
[2]  
Bendse M., 2003, Topology optimization: theory, methods, and applications
[3]  
Bendse MP., 1989, Structural optimization, V1, P193, DOI [DOI 10.1007/BF01650949, 10.1007/BF01650949]
[4]   GENERATING OPTIMAL TOPOLOGIES IN STRUCTURAL DESIGN USING A HOMOGENIZATION METHOD [J].
BENDSOE, MP ;
KIKUCHI, N .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 1988, 71 (02) :197-224
[5]   Topology optimization of fluids in Stokes flow [J].
Borrvall, T ;
Petersson, J .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN FLUIDS, 2003, 41 (01) :77-107
[6]   Topology optimization of non-linear elastic structures and compliant mechanisms [J].
Bruns, TE ;
Tortorelli, DA .
COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2001, 190 (26-27) :3443-3459
[7]   Topology optimization design of functionally graded bimorph-type piezoelectric actuators [J].
Carbonari, Ronny C. ;
Silva, Emilio C. N. ;
Paulino, Glaucio H. .
SMART MATERIALS AND STRUCTURES, 2007, 16 (06) :2605-2620
[8]   CHECKERBOARD PATTERNS IN LAYOUT OPTIMIZATION [J].
Diaz, A ;
Sigmund, O .
STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION, 1995, 10 (01) :40-45
[9]   Optimizing multifunctional materials:: Design of microstructures for maximized stiffness and fluid permeability [J].
Guest, James K. ;
Prevost, Jean H. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2006, 43 (22-23) :7028-7047
[10]   Imposing maximum length scale in topology optimization [J].
Guest, James K. .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2009, 37 (05) :463-473