Comparative study on the effects of meteorological and pollutant parameters on ANN modelling for prediction of SO2

被引:10
作者
Unnikrishnan, Reshma [1 ]
Madhu, G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Cochin Univ Sci & Technol, Sch Engn, Div Safety & Fire Engn, Kochi 682022, Kerala, India
来源
SN APPLIED SCIENCES | 2019年 / 1卷 / 11期
关键词
Artificial neural network (ANN); Air quality modelling; Prediction; Backpropagation; SO2; concentration; Feedforward; Time-series;
D O I
10.1007/s42452-019-1440-1
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Variations in meteorological parameters, different transportation mechanisms, complex reaction mechanisms and insufficient control measures have made control of ambient air pollution, a challenge. Prediction mechanisms for pollutant concentrations in advance have become necessary to regulate parameters within the acceptable limits. Artificial neural network (ANN) modelling can be used for predicting the concentrations of pollutants by establishing functional relationships between complex and nonlinear predictor variables and outputs. The application of time-series ANN models to predict air quality parameters was investigated by using six pollutant variables, five meteorological parameters and three time parameters to predict the concentration of SO2. An industrial belt in the southern part of India was selected as the study area.Two years of input parameters and feed-forward back propagation algorithm were used to construct the ANN model. Input parameters were optimized using forward selection and backward elimination techniques. Mean squared error and coefficient of determination were used to evaluate the models. The developed model exhibited very promising performance evaluation characteristics with the best model resulting in MSE of 0.0115 and R-2 value of 0.8979. The hybrid ANN models employing input parameter optimization techniques resulted in better performance characteristic values than conventional models. Any model exhibited a minimum reduction in MSE by 9% and 3% improvement in correlation. Pollutant parameters were found to affect the ANN models when compared to the meteorological parameters. Predicted values compared to the National Ambient Air Quality Standards were as low as 55% of the maximum allowable concentration in ambient air.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, OECD GUID TEST CHEM
[2]  
Athira V., 2018, Procedia Computer Science, V132, P1394, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2018.05.068
[3]  
Benkachcha S., 2015, INT J COMP APP, V116, P2805, DOI [10.5120/20451-2805, DOI 10.5120/20451-2805]
[4]   Hybrid Artificial Neural Network Models for Effective Prediction and Mitigation of Urban Roadside NO2 Pollution [J].
Cabaneros, Sheen Mclean S. ;
Calautit, John Kaiser S. ;
Hughes, Ben Richard .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 9TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 142 :3524-3530
[5]   Detecting and characterising small changes in urban nitrogen dioxide concentrations [J].
Carslaw, David C. ;
Carslaw, Nicola .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 41 (22) :4723-4733
[6]   Development of an ANN-based air pollution forecasting system with explicit knowledge through sensitivity analysis [J].
Elangasinghe, Madhavi Anushka ;
Singhal, Naresh ;
Dirks, Kim N. ;
Salmond, Jennifer A. .
ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2014, 5 (04) :696-708
[7]  
Fausett L, 1994, FUNDAMENTALS NEURAL, P21
[8]   Artificial neural networks forecasting of PM2.5 pollution using air mass trajectory based geographic model and wavelet transformation [J].
Feng, Xiao ;
Li, Qi ;
Zhu, Yajie ;
Hou, Junxiong ;
Jin, Lingyan ;
Wang, Jingjie .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 107 :118-128
[9]   Statistically Enhanced Multi-Dimensional Trust Computing Mechanism for Cloud Computing [J].
Firdhous, Mohamed ;
Hassan, Suhaidi ;
Ghazali, Osman .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MOBILE COMPUTING AND MULTIMEDIA COMMUNICATIONS, 2013, 5 (02) :1-17
[10]   Assessment of producer gas composition in air gasification of biomass using artificial neural network model [J].
George, Joel ;
Arun, P. ;
Muraleedharan, C. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2018, 43 (20) :9558-9568