How long do revised and multiply revised knee replacements last? A retrospective observational study of the National Joint Registry

被引:22
作者
Deere, Kevin [1 ]
Whitehouse, Michael R. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Kunutsor, Setor K. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Sayers, Adrian [1 ]
Price, Andrew J. [4 ]
Mason, James [5 ]
Blom, Ashley W. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Southmead Hosp, Bristol Med Sch, Musculoskeletal Res Unit, Translat Hlth Sci, Bristol BS10 5NB, Avon, England
[2] Univ Hosp Bristol & Weston NHS Fdn Trust, Natl Inst Hlth Res, Bristol Biomed Res Ctr, Bristol, Avon, England
[3] Univ Bristol, Bristol, Avon, England
[4] Botnar Res Ctr, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed Rheumatol & Musculoskelet, Oxford, England
[5] Univ Warwick, Warwick Med Sch, Coventry, W Midlands, England
关键词
LIFETIME RISK; TOTAL HIP; ARTHROPLASTY; PROJECTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/S2665-9913(21)00079-5
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Knee replacements are common and effective operations but patients that undergo this intervention are at risk of needing subsequent costly and often complex revision surgery with poorer outcomes than primary surgery. The treatment pathway over the life of the patient in terms of risk of revision and re-revisions is poorly described. We aim to provide detailed information on the longevity of revision surgery. Methods We did a retrospective observational registry-based study of the National Joint Registry in England and Wales, UK. Knee replacement revision procedures linked to a primary episode were included; duplicates, records with missing information, and records with an unknown sequence of revision procedures were not included. Kaplan-Meier estimates were used to determine the cumulative probability of revision and subsequent re-revisions following primary knee replacement. Analyses were stratified by age and gender, and the influence of time from first to second revision on the risk of further revision was explored. Findings Between April 1, 2003, and Dec 31, 2018, 33 292 revision knee replacements were linked with a primary episode. Revision rates of revision knee replacements were higher in males than females at 10 years (20.0% [95% CI 19.0-21.0] vs 14.8% [13.9-15.6]) and higher in younger patients at 10 years (females younger than 55 years 21.0% [18.6-23.5] vs females aged 75-79 years 8.3% [6.8-10.2]; males younger than 55 years 26.6% [23.9-29.5] vs males aged 75-79 years 13.6% [10.6-17.5]). 19.9% (18.3-21.5) of first revisions were revised again within 13 years, 20.7% (19.1-22.4) of second revisions were revised again within 5 years, and 20.7% (17.1-24.9) of third revisions were revised again within 3 years. A shorter time between revision episodes was associated with earlier subsequent revision. Interpretation Males and younger patients are at higher risk of multiple revisions. Patients who undergo a revision have a steadily increasing risk of further revision the more procedures they undergo, and each subsequent revision lasts for approximately half the time of the previous one. Although knee replacements are effective for improving pain and function and usually last a remarkably long time, if they are revised, successive revisions are progressively and markedly less successful. Copyright (C) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:E438 / E446
页数:9
相关论文
共 35 条
  • [1] Clinical Survivorship of Aseptic Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty Using Hinged Knees and Tantalum Cones at Minimum 10-Year Follow-Up
    Abdelaziz, Hussein
    Jaramillo, Rodrigo
    Gehrke, Thorsten
    Ohlmeier, Matte
    Citak, Mustafa
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (12) : 3018 - 3022
  • [2] Substantial rise in the lifetime risk of primary total knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis from 2003 to 2013: an international, population-level analysis
    Ackerman, I. N.
    Bohensky, M. A.
    de Steiger, R.
    Brand, C. A.
    Eskelinen, A.
    Fenstad, A. M.
    Furnes, O.
    Garellick, G.
    Graves, S. E.
    Haapakoski, J.
    Havelin, L. I.
    Makela, K.
    Mehnert, F.
    Pedersen, A. B.
    Robertsson, O.
    [J]. OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2017, 25 (04) : 455 - 461
  • [3] Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, 2020, HIP KNEE SHOULD ARTH
  • [4] Long-term Survival Rate of Implants and Modes of Failure After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty by a Single Surgeon
    Bae, Dae Kyung
    Song, Sang Jun
    Heo, Dong Beom
    Lee, Sang Hyeon
    Song, Wook Jae
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2013, 28 (07) : 1130 - 1134
  • [5] The effect of patient age at intervention on risk of implant revision after total replacement of the hip or knee: a population-based cohort study
    Bayliss, Lee E.
    Culliford, David
    Monk, A. Paul
    Glyn-Jones, Sion
    Prieto-Alhambra, Daniel
    Judge, Andrew
    Cooper, Cyrus
    Carr, Andrew J.
    Arden, Nigel K.
    Beard, David J.
    Price, Andrew J.
    [J]. LANCET, 2017, 389 (10077) : 1424 - 1430
  • [6] Briggs T, 2015, GETTING IT RIGHT 1 T
  • [7] Cost effectiveness of revision total knee arthroplasty
    Burns, Alexander W. R.
    Bourne, Robert B.
    Chesworth, Bert M.
    MacDonald, Steven J.
    Rorabeck, Cecil H.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2006, (446) : 29 - 33
  • [8] What are patients' preferences for revision surgery after periprosthetic joint infection? A discrete choice experiment
    Carroll, Fran E.
    Gooberman-Hill, Rachael
    Strange, Simon
    Blom, Ashley W.
    Moore, Andrew J.
    [J]. BMJ OPEN, 2020, 10 (01):
  • [9] Contemporary Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients Younger Than 50 Years: 1 in 3 Risk of Re-Revision by 10 Years
    Chalmers, Brian P.
    Pallante, Graham D.
    Sierra, Rafael J.
    Lewallen, David G.
    Pagnano, Mark W.
    Trousdale, Robert T.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2019, 34 (07) : S266 - S270
  • [10] Total Knee Arthroplasty Volume, Utilization, and Outcomes Among Medicare Beneficiaries, 1991-2010
    Cram, Peter
    Lu, Xin
    Kates, Stephen L.
    Singh, Jasvinder A.
    Li, Yue
    Wolf, Brian R.
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 308 (12): : 1227 - 1236