Individual Differences in Alcohol Drinking Frequency Are Associated With Electrophysiological Responses to Unexpected Nonrewards

被引:21
作者
Franken, Ingmar H. A. [1 ]
Van den Berg, Ivo [1 ]
Van Strien, Jan W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Inst Psychol, Erasmus Affect Neurosci Lab, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
Alcohol; Electrophysiology; ERP; Reward; MFN; MEDIAL FRONTAL-CORTEX; BEHAVIORAL-APPROACH SYSTEM; PSYCHOMETRIC PROPERTIES; REWARD SENSITIVITY; DOPAMINE NEURONS; BIS/BAS SCALES; ERP COMPONENTS; SUBSTANCE USE; ERROR; PERSONALITY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1530-0277.2009.01139.x
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: It has been suggested that alcohol use is related to sensitivity of the reward system. Although there are several studies using self-reported measures supportive of this notion, objective biological data in humans on this issue are lacking. Aims: This study is designed to test whether alcohol drinking frequency is associated with electrophysiological indices of reward processing. Materials and Methods: In a passive gambling task, stimuli predicted the presence (reward) and absence (nonreward) of rewards resulting in P2 and medial frontal negativity (MFN) indices of reward processing. Forty-seven undergraduate students were asked about their habitual drinking frequency and the P2 and MFN to stimuli predicting reward were measured. Results: Most importantly, the MFN to unpredicted nonrewards at the frontal midline (Fz) location correlated significantly with drinking frequency, with frequent drinkers showing larger MFN amplitudes. The results did not show a significant association between frequency and alcohol drinking and P2. Discussion: Although several studies showing increased reward-sensitivity in addictive behaviors, the present results indicate that, in frequent alcohol drinkers, electrophysiological responsiveness is particularly activated by unpredicted nonrewards. In general, this may point to the involvement of the reward system in alcohol drinking frequency. Conclusion: More specifically, the results demonstrate an increased vulnerability of high frequency drinkers to signals of (frustrative) nonrewards.
引用
收藏
页码:702 / 707
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1993, EMOTIONS ESSAYS EMOT
[2]   Parsing reward [J].
Berridge, KC ;
Robinson, TE .
TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 2003, 26 (09) :507-513
[3]   Sensitivity to punishment and reward omission: Evidence from error-related ERP components [J].
Boksem, Maarten A. S. ;
Tops, Mattie ;
Kostermans, Evelien ;
De Cremer, David .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 79 (02) :185-192
[4]   Error-related ERP components and individual differences in punishment and reward sensitivity [J].
Boksem, Maarten A. S. ;
Tops, Mattie ;
Wester, Anne E. ;
Meijman, Theo F. ;
Lorist, Monique M. .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 2006, 1101 :92-101
[5]  
Boon M. T. G., 1999, TIJDSCHR PSYCHIAT, V41, P109
[6]   Negative affects deriving from the behavioral approach system [J].
Carver, CS .
EMOTION, 2004, 4 (01) :3-22
[7]   Psychometric properties of the Dickman Impulsivity Inventory [J].
Claes, L ;
Vertommen, H ;
Braspenning, N .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2000, 29 (01) :27-35
[8]   The role of impulsivity in the development of substance use and eating disorders [J].
Dawe, S ;
Loxton, NJ .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2004, 28 (03) :343-351
[9]   FUNCTIONAL AND DYSFUNCTIONAL IMPULSIVITY - PERSONALITY AND COGNITIVE CORRELATES [J].
DICKMAN, SJ .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1990, 58 (01) :95-102
[10]  
Finn Peter R, 2002, Behav Cogn Neurosci Rev, V1, P183, DOI 10.1177/1534582302001003001