SHIFTing artificial intelligence to be responsible in healthcare: A systematic review

被引:133
作者
Siala, Haytham [1 ]
Wang, Yichuan [2 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Business Sch London, 102 Middlesex St, London E1 7EZ, England
[2] Univ Sheffield, Sheffield Univ Management Sch, Conduit Rd, Sheffield S10 1FL, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
Systematic literature review; Responsible artificial intelligence (AI); Health-medicine; AI ethics; Digital health; Virtue ethics; UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES; VIRTUE ETHICS; MEDICAL AI; PRIVACY; FRAMEWORK; CONSENT;
D O I
10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114782
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
A variety of ethical concerns about artificial intelligence (AI) implementation in healthcare have emerged as AI becomes increasingly applicable and technologically advanced. The last decade has witnessed significant en-deavors in striking a balance between ethical considerations and health transformation led by AI. Despite a growing interest in AI ethics, implementing AI-related technologies and initiatives responsibly in healthcare settings remains a challenge. In response to this topical challenge, we reviewed 253 articles pertaining to AI ethics in healthcare published between 2000 and 2020, summarizing the coherent themes of responsible AI initiatives. A preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) approach was employed to screen and select articles, and a hermeneutic approach was adopted to conduct systematic literature review. By synthesizing relevant knowledge from AI governance and ethics, we propose a responsible AI initiative framework that encompasses five core themes for AI solution developers, healthcare professionals, and policy makers. These themes are summarized in the acronym SHIFT: Sustainability, Human centeredness, Inclu-siveness, Fairness, and Transparency. In addition, we unravel the key issues and challenges concerning responsible AI use in healthcare, and outline avenues for future research
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 137 条
[51]   Values, challenges and future directions of big data analytics in healthcare: A systematic review [J].
Galetsi, P. ;
Katsaliaki, K. ;
Kumar, S. .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2019, 241
[52]   BBMRI-ERIC's contributions to research and knowledge exchange on COVID-19 [J].
Holub, Petr ;
Kozera, Lukasz ;
Florindi, Francesco ;
van Enckevort, Esther ;
Swertz, Morris ;
Reihs, Robert ;
Wutte, Andrea ;
Valik, Dalibor ;
Mayrhofer, Michaela Th .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2020, 28 (06) :728-731
[53]   Here Comes the Bad News: Doctor Robot Taking Over [J].
Hoorn, Johan F. ;
Winter, Sonja D. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS, 2018, 10 (04) :519-535
[54]   Artificial Intelligence: Power for Civilisation - and for Better Healthcare [J].
Horgan, Denis ;
Romao, Mario ;
Morre, Servaas A. ;
Kalra, Dipak .
PUBLIC HEALTH GENOMICS, 2020, 22 (5-6) :145-161
[55]   Artificial intelligence for global health [J].
Hosny, Ahmed ;
Aerts, Hugo J. W. L. .
SCIENCE, 2019, 366 (6468) :955-956
[56]  
Ienca Marcello, 2020, AJOB Neurosci, V11, P77, DOI 10.1080/21507740.2020.1740352
[57]   Beyond artificial intelligence: exploring artificial wisdom [J].
Jeste, Dilip V. ;
Graham, Sarah A. ;
Nguyen, Tanya T. ;
Depp, Colin A. ;
Lee, Ellen E. ;
Kim, Ho-Cheol .
INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS, 2020, 32 (08) :993-1001
[58]   Drug discovery with explainable artificial intelligence [J].
Jimenez-Luna, Jose ;
Grisoni, Francesca ;
Schneider, Gisbert .
NATURE MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2020, 2 (10) :573-584
[59]   The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines [J].
Jobin, Anna ;
Ienca, Marcello ;
Vayena, Effy .
NATURE MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2019, 1 (09) :389-399
[60]   Blockchain-enabled Clinical Study Consent Management [J].
Jung, Hans H. ;
Pfister, Franz M. J. .
TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2020, 10 (02) :14-24