Significance of the pseudocapsule on MRI of renal neoplasms and its potential application for local staging: A retrospective study

被引:56
作者
Roy, C
El Ghali, S
Buy, X
Lindner, V
Lang, H
Saussine, C
Jacqmin, D
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Strasbourg, Hop Civil, CHU, F-67091 Strasbourg, France
[2] Univ Hosp Strasbourg, Hop Civil Urol, F-67091 Strasbourg, France
关键词
D O I
10.2214/ajr.184.1.01840113
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the role of MRI in Showing a pseudocapsule for local staging of renal tumors. and its potential application to select patients for partial surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS. Eighty tumors (73 renal cell carcinomas [RCCs] and seven oncocytomas) were preoperatively evaluated by NfR1. NfR1 findings assessed with a special focus on perinephric fat and pseudocapsule. Correlations were performed with pathologic staging after surgery. RESULTS. At pathology, a pseudocapsule was recognized in 79 cases. Twenty-three RCC were staged pT3a (21 clear cell; two papillary). MR image exhibited a pseudocapsule in 90% of cases as a hypointense rim surrounding the tumor on T2-weighted images. MRI findings concerning isolated analysis of the pseudocapsule for differentiating stage T1/T2 from T3a were sensitivity: 86%, 50%; specificity: 95%, 92%; positive predictive value: 95%, 33%: negative predictive value: 88%, 92%; and accuracy: 93%, 89%, for clear cell and papillary types respectively. For stage T3a, with both abnormalities of the pseudocapsule and perirenal fat. results were, for overall RCC sensitivity: 84%; specificity: 95%; positive predictive value: 91%: negative predictive value: 91%; and accuracy: 91%. CONCLUSION. The identification of the pseudocapsule offers an additional value for local staging by MRI. The presence of an intact pseudocapsule is a sip of lack of perinephric fat invasion. It is more likely to predict that the tumor can be removed by partial surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 120
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
BENNINGTON JL, 1975, ATLAS TUMOR PATHOL 2, V12, P93
[2]   MANAGEMENT OF SMALL UNILATERAL RENAL-CELL CARCINOMAS - RADICAL VERSUS NEPHRON-SPARING SURGERY [J].
BUTLER, BP ;
NOVICK, AC ;
MILLER, DP ;
CAMPBELL, SA ;
LICHT, MR .
UROLOGY, 1995, 45 (01) :34-40
[3]   High-resolution multidetector CT in the preoperative evaluation of patients with renal cell carcinoma [J].
Catalano, C ;
Fraioli, F ;
Laghi, A ;
Napoli, A ;
Pediconi, F ;
Danti, M ;
Nardis, P ;
Passariello, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2003, 180 (05) :1271-1277
[4]   FOCAL RENAL MASSES - MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING [J].
CHOYKE, PL ;
KRESSEL, HY ;
POLLACK, HM ;
ARGER, PM ;
AXEL, L ;
MAMOURIAN, AC .
RADIOLOGY, 1984, 152 (02) :471-477
[5]   Renal cancer: Preoperative evaluation with dual-phase three-dimensional MR angiography [J].
Choyke, PL ;
Walther, MM ;
Wagner, JR ;
Rayford, W ;
Lyne, JC ;
Linehan, WM .
RADIOLOGY, 1997, 205 (03) :767-771
[6]   DIAGNOSIS AND STAGING OF RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA - A COMPARISON OF MR IMAGING AND CT [J].
FEIN, AB ;
LEE, JKT ;
BALFE, DM ;
HEIKEN, JP ;
LING, D ;
GLAZER, HS ;
MCCLENNAN, BL .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1987, 148 (04) :749-753
[7]   Partial nephrectomy for unilateral renal carcinoma and a normal contralateral kidney: 10-year followup [J].
Herr, HW .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1999, 161 (01) :33-34
[8]   MAGNETIC-RESONANCE IMAGING IN THE DIAGNOSIS AND STAGING OF RENAL AND PERIRENAL NEOPLASMS [J].
HRICAK, H ;
DEMAS, BE ;
WILLIAMS, RD ;
MCNAMARA, MT ;
HEDGCOCK, MW ;
AMPARO, EG ;
TANAGHO, EA .
RADIOLOGY, 1985, 154 (03) :709-715
[9]   RENAL ADENOCARCINOMA - CT STAGING OF 100 TUMORS [J].
JOHNSON, CD ;
DUNNICK, NR ;
COHAN, RH ;
ILLESCAS, FF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1987, 148 (01) :59-63
[10]   Dual-phase helical CT of the kidney: Value of the corticomedullary and nephrographic phase for evaluation of renal lesions and preoperative staging of renal cell carcinoma [J].
Kopka, L ;
Fischer, U ;
Zoeller, G ;
Schmidt, C ;
Ringert, RH ;
Grabbe, E .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1997, 169 (06) :1573-1578