About the Purpose Opus postumum in Kant's Philosophical System

被引:0
作者
Kalinnikov, Leonard A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Kant Baltic Fed Univ, Immanuel, Kaliningrad, Russia
关键词
Kant; Opus postumum; philosophical system; critics; doctrine; philosophy; science; physics; hyperphysics; biology; anthropology;
D O I
10.21146/0042-8744-2021-4-110-123
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
At the article devoted Kant's last unfinished work "The transition from metaphysical elements of the natural sciences to physics" (Opus postumum) is made an assumption that Kant in course of the working has decided to change the first title of book extend its subject end to give the new one - "The philosophy as a science". Only the successfulness of the philosophical system as the methodology of science can be the base of its truth. So, Kant comes to the conclusion a philosophical system mast has two parts: 1 the system of critics (the analysis all cognitions of the soul) and 2 the doctrine, i.e. the theoretical science knowledge as the mediator among philosophy and empirical science. Kant assigns a part of doctrine to Opus postumum. In the course of working at the manuscript Kant suggested number of hypotheses overstepping the limits of classical science. Kant proceeded from the principle of material unity of world in construction of the system so the doctrine should contain three parts. Accordingly in the Opus postumum there are materials devoted to physics, biology and anthropology. Kant introduces the notion of hyperphysics with which idea of a first substance is connected named by Kant a heat matter, or a light, or an ether an absolutely thin all-penetrating structure could be the basis for every things of material world. This ideas opened perspectives of post-classical science.
引用
收藏
页码:110 / 123
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
[31]   It's Not about Race: Good Wars, Bad Wars, and the Origins of Kant's Anti-Colonialism [J].
Valdez, Ines .
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW, 2017, 111 (04) :819-834
[33]   The problem of the legality of constitutional laws according to Kant's vision about law and coercion [J].
de Queiroz Barboza, Estefania Maria .
A&C-REVISTA DE DIREITO ADMINISTRATIVO & CONSTITUCIONAL, 2006, 6 (25) :161-180
[34]   The Dilemmas of Socratism in Modernity. Some Hypotheses about Arendt's Reading of Kant [J].
Hunziker, Paula .
ANACRONISMO E IRRUPCION, 2019, 9 (16) :11-39
[35]   DID KANT HAVE A DOG? ABOUT THE DOG OF KANT. AROUND BORGES, THE PHILOSOPHY AND THE TIME OF DAVID E. JOHNSON'S [J].
Liviana Messina, Aicha .
IDEAS Y VALORES, 2020, 69 :19-26
[36]   The theory of love in Ortega's thought about 1914. Ethical-philosophical and anthropological keys of Meditations on Quixote [J].
de Haro Honrubia, Alejandro .
ANALES DEL SEMINARIO DE HISTORIA DE LA FILOSOFIA, 2018, 35 (01) :175-204
[37]   Kant?s concepts of system and freedom as the origin of Schelling?s middle metaphysics of freedom [J].
Rodriguez, Juan Jose .
CON-TEXTOS KANTIANOS-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 2022, (16) :242-256
[38]   Do the Works of the Nationalist-Ideological Philosophers Undermine Hume's and Kant's Ideas About Race? [J].
Nwosimiri, Ovett .
SAGE OPEN, 2017, 7 (01) :1-11
[39]   SUBLIME AND PAINTING IN FICHTE'S FIRST OUTLINE OF SYSTEM IN COMPARISON WITH KANT [J].
Cecchinato, Giorgia .
TOPICOS-REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA, 2018, (54) :201-214
[40]   THE "SYSTEM" OF MORAL? AN INVESTIGATION ON THE INTERNAL SYSTEMICITY OF THE METAPHYSICS OF KANT'S CUSTOMS [J].
Trevisan, Diego Kosbiau .
KRITERION-REVISTA DE FILOSOFIA, 2016, 57 (134) :401-419