Preliminary psychometric properties of the Common Intervention Scale (CIS): an instrument to study actions of therapists from different theoretical framework

被引:0
作者
Manubens, Rocio Tamara [1 ]
Gomez Penedo, Juan Martin [1 ]
Juan, Santiago [1 ]
Roussos, Andres J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
来源
PENSANDO PSICOLOGIA | 2019年 / 15卷 / 25期
关键词
confirmatory factor analysis; common interventions scale; exploratory factor analysis; ALLIANCE; BEHAVIORS; GUIDE;
D O I
10.16925/2382-3984.2019.01.02
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Aims: This article aims to present the Scale of Common Interventions (EIC), an instrument aimed at exploring the use of psychotherapeutic interventions used by therapists of different theoretical frameworks and analyze its psychometric properties. Methodology: A non-probabilistic sample of 101 psychoanalytic and cognitive behavioral therapists completed an online version of the scale based on the last session with an adult patient. Based on this data preliminary reliability analyzes and an exploratory factor analysis was performed. Subsequently, to validate the factorial structure of the instrument, a confirmatory factor analysis was performed, based on data from a new sample of 213 therapists identified with various theoretical frameworks that completed the scale. Results: The exploratory factor analysis suggested a first solution of three factors; as one of them did not have the minimum required items per factor, said items were excluded and a new factor analysis was generated that resulted in a two-factor solution, which explained 71.1% of the total variance. The ordinal a coefficients presented levels adequate reliability in both factors. Confirmatory factor analysis showed that all estimated standardized loads of the nine items presented parameters significant (p <0.001). Discussion: The EIC is presented as a scale, which has evidence of validity and reliability, which as a short and simple instrument can represent a valuable contribution to studies aimed at evaluating psychotherapeutic interventions in the Latin American context.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 42 条
[31]  
Safran J.D., 2002, PSYCHOTHERAPY RELATI, P235, DOI [DOI 10.1037/0033-3204.38.4.406, DOI 10.1037/A0022140]
[32]  
Stover JB, 2012, REV ARGENT CIENC COM, V4, P4
[33]   A NUMERICAL APPROACH TO THE APPROXIMATE AND THE EXACT MINIMUM RANK OF A COVARIANCE-MATRIX [J].
TENBERGE, JMF ;
KIERS, HAL .
PSYCHOMETRIKA, 1991, 56 (02) :309-315
[34]   Dimensionality Assessment of Ordered Polytomous Items With Parallel Analysis [J].
Timmerman, Marieke E. ;
Lorenzo-Seva, Urbano .
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS, 2011, 16 (02) :209-220
[35]  
Trijsburg R.W., 2004, Canadian Journal of Psychoanalysis / Revue Canadienne de Psychanalyse, V12, P325
[36]   Development of the Comprehensive Psychotherapeutic Interventions Rating Scale (CPIRS) [J].
Trijsburg, RW ;
Frederiks, GCFJ ;
Gorlee, M ;
Klouwer, E ;
den Hollander, AM ;
Duivenvoorden, HJ .
PSYCHOTHERAPY RESEARCH, 2002, 12 (03) :287-317
[37]  
Valdés N, 2010, REV ARGENT CLIN PSIC, V19, P117
[38]  
Waizmann V, 2004, REV ARGENT CLIN PSIC, VXIII, P233
[39]  
Waizmann V., 2006, ANU INVEST, VXIV, P41
[40]  
Waizmann V, 2010, THESIS