Utility of endoscopic ultrasound, cytology and fluid carcinoembryonic antigen and CA 19-9 levels in pancreatic cystic lesions

被引:32
作者
Aljebreen, Abdulrahman M.
Romagnuolo, Joseph
Perini, Rafael
Sutherland, Francis
机构
[1] Med Univ S Carolina, Digest Dis Ctr, Charleston, SC 29425 USA
[2] King Saud Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, Riyadh 11461, Saudi Arabia
[3] Univ Calgary, Div Gastroenterol, Calgary, AB, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Dept Gen Surg, Calgary, AB, Canada
关键词
endoscopic ultrasound; carcinoembryonic antigen; CA; 19-9; pancreatic cystic lesions; fine needle aspiration;
D O I
10.3748/wjg.v13.i29.3962
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
AIM: To assess the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS), fluid tumor markers and cytology in distinguishing benign from (pre)malignant pancreatic cystic lesions. METHODS: 46 consecutive patients, referred to a gastroenterologist and surgeon for a symptomatic or incidental pancreatic cyst, were reviewed. EUS, cytology, and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA 19-9) levels were compared with the final diagnosis, based on surgical pathology and/or imaging follow-up of at least 12 mo. Cysts were classified as benign (pseudocyst, serous cystadenoma) or malignant/pre-malignant (mucinous cystic neoplasm). Receiver-operator characteristics (ROC) curve analysis was performed. RESULTS: The mean age was 56 years; 29% were male and median cyst diameter was 3 cm. Final outcome was obtained in 41 (89%) patients. Twenty-three (56%) of these 41 had surgical pathology. Twenty-three (56%) had benign lesions and 18 (44%) had malignant/premalignant lesions. Sensitivity, specificity and positive and negative predictive value of EUS alone to distinguish benign from malignant/premalignant pancreatic cystic lesions were 50%, 56%, 36% and 54% and for cytology were 71%, 96%, 92% and 85%, respectively. The corresponding values for the ROC-derived ideal cutoffs were 75%, 90%, 75%, 90% for CA 19-9 (> 37 U/mL) and 70%, 85%, 79% and 78% for CEA (> 3.1 ng/mL). Subgroup analysis of those with surgical pathology yielded almost identical performance and cutoffs. CONCLUSION: Cytology and cyst fluid tumor marker analysis is a very useful tool in distinguishing benign from (pre)malignant pancreatic cystic lesions. (c) 2007 WJG. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3962 / 3966
页数:5
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
Ahmad NA, 2001, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V96, P3295
[2]   Cystic lesions of the pancreas: Selection criteria for operative and nonoperative management in 209 patients [J].
Allen, PJ ;
Jaques, DP ;
D'Angelica, M ;
Bowne, WB ;
Conlon, KC ;
Brennan, MF .
JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2003, 7 (08) :970-976
[3]  
ATHLIN L, 1990, ACTA CHIR SCAND, V156, P91
[4]  
BALTHAZAR EJ, 1990, AM J GASTROENTEROL, V85, P343
[5]   Detection and tumor staging of malignancy in cystic, intraductal, and solid tumors of the pancreas by EUS [J].
Brandwein, SL ;
Farrell, JJ ;
Centeno, BA ;
Brugge, WR .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 53 (07) :722-727
[6]   Diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: A report of the cooperative pancreatic cyst study [J].
Brugge, WR ;
Lewandrowski, K ;
Lee-Lewandrowski, E ;
Centeno, BA ;
Szydlo, T ;
Regan, S ;
del Castillo, CF ;
Warshaw, AL .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 126 (05) :1330-1336
[7]   Evaluation of pancreatic cystic lesions with EUS [J].
Brugge, WR .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2004, 59 (06) :698-707
[8]   The role of EUS in the diagnosis of cystic lesions of the pancreas [J].
Brugge, WR .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2000, 52 (06) :S18-S22
[9]   Performance of endo sonography-guided fine needle aspiration and biopsy in the diagnosis of pancreatic cystic lesions [J].
Frossard, JL ;
Amouyal, P ;
Amouyal, G ;
Palazzo, L ;
Amaris, J ;
Soldan, M ;
Giostra, E ;
Spahr, L ;
Hadengue, A ;
Fabre, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 98 (07) :1516-1524
[10]   PREOPERATIVE CYST FLUID ANALYSIS IS USEFUL FOR THE DIFFERENTIAL-DIAGNOSIS OF CYSTIC LESIONS OF THE PANCREAS [J].
HAMMEL, P ;
LEVY, P ;
VOITOT, H ;
LEVY, M ;
VILGRAIN, V ;
ZINS, M ;
FLEJOU, JF ;
MOLAS, G ;
RUSZNIEWSKI, P ;
BERNADES, P .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1995, 108 (04) :1230-1235