Attending to auditory signals slows visual alternations in binocular rivalry

被引:50
作者
Alais, David [1 ]
van Boxtel, Jeroen J. [2 ]
Parker, Amanda [1 ]
van Ee, Raymond [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Psychol, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] CALTECH, Div Biol, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[3] Univ Utrecht, Helmholtz Inst, NL-3584 CC Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Perceptual ambiguity; Binocular rivalry; Audiovisual interactions; ATTENTION; MOTION; PERCEPTION; DYNAMICS; DOMINANCE; BISTABILITY; MECHANISMS; HIERARCHY; AWARENESS; STRENGTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.visres.2010.03.010
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
A previous study has shown that diverting attention from binocular rivalry to a visual distractor task results in a slowing of rivalry alternation rate between simple orthogonal orientations. Here, we investigate whether the slowing of visual perceptual alternations will occur when attention is diverted to an auditory distractor task, and we extend the investigation by testing this for two kinds of binocular rivalry stimuli and for the Necker cube. Our results show that doing the auditory attention task does indeed slow visual perceptual alternations, that the slowing effect is a graded function of attentional load, and that the attentional slowing effect is less pronounced for grating rivalry than for house/face rivalry and for the Necker cube. These results are explained in terms of supramodal attentional resources modulating a high-level interpretative process in perceptual ambiguity, together with a role for feedback to early visual processes in the case of binocular rivalry. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:929 / 935
页数:7
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]   Separate attentional resources for vision and audition [J].
Alais, D ;
Morrone, C ;
Burr, D .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2006, 273 (1592) :1339-1345
[2]   Neural strength of visual attention gauged by motion adaptation [J].
Alais, D ;
Blake, R .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 1999, 2 (11) :1015-1018
[3]   Interactions between global motion and local binocular rivalry [J].
Alais, D ;
Blake, R .
VISION RESEARCH, 1998, 38 (05) :637-644
[4]  
Alais D., 2005, Binocular Rivalry
[5]   Strength and coherence of binocular rivalry depends on shared stimulus complexity [J].
Alais, David ;
Melcher, David .
VISION RESEARCH, 2007, 47 (02) :269-279
[6]   Independent binocular rivalry processes for motion and form [J].
Alais, David ;
Parker, Amanda .
NEURON, 2006, 52 (05) :911-920
[7]   Multisensory Processing in Review: from Physiology to Behaviour [J].
Alais, David ;
Newell, Fiona N. ;
Mamassian, Pascal .
SEEING AND PERCEIVING, 2010, 23 (01) :3-38
[8]   Natural images dominate in binocular rivalry [J].
Baker, Daniel H. ;
Graf, Erich W. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2009, 106 (13) :5436-5441
[9]   Attending to visual or auditory motion affects perception within and across modalities:: an event-related potential study [J].
Beer, AL ;
Röder, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 21 (04) :1116-1130
[10]   A NEURAL THEORY OF BINOCULAR-RIVALRY [J].
BLAKE, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1989, 96 (01) :145-167