Confirming the species-sensitivity distribution concept for endosulfan using laboratory, mesocosm, and field data

被引:146
作者
Hose, GC
Van den Brink, PJ
机构
[1] Univ Technol Sydney, Inst Water & Environm Resource Management, Gore Hill, NSW 2065, Australia
[2] Univ Wageningen & Res Ctr, Alterra Green World Res, Wageningen, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s00244-003-3212-5
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In Australia, water-quality trigger values for toxicants are derived using protective concentration values based on species-sensitivity distribution (SSD) curves. SSD curves are generally derived from laboratory data with an emphasis on using local or site-specific data. In this study, Australian and non-Australian laboratory-species based SSD curves were compared and the concept of species protection confirmed by comparison of laboratory-based SSD curves with local mesocosm experiments and field monitoring data. Acute LC50 data for the organochlorine pesticide endosulfan were used for these comparisons; SSD curves were fitted using the Burr type III distribution. SSD curves indicated that the sensitivities of Australian fish and arthropods were not significantly different from those of corresponding non-Australian taxa. Arthropod taxa in the mesocosm were less sensitive than taxa in laboratory tests, which suggests that laboratory-generated single-species data may be used to predict concentrations protective of semifield (mesocosm) systems. SSDs based on laboratory data were also protective of field populations.
引用
收藏
页码:511 / 520
页数:10
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, GUIDANCE DOCUMENT HI
[2]  
Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand, 2000, AUSTR NZ WAT QUAL GU
[3]   ARE SINGLE SPECIES TOXICITY TESTS ALONE ADEQUATE FOR ESTIMATING ENVIRONMENTAL-HAZARD [J].
CAIRNS, J .
HYDROBIOLOGIA, 1983, 100 :47-57
[4]  
Campbell E., 2000, National water quality management strategy, Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for fresh and marine water quality
[5]  
Chapman John, 2001, Australasian Journal of Ecotoxicology, V7, P95
[6]  
Chapman John C., 2001, Australasian Journal of Ecotoxicology, V7, P157
[7]  
DAVIES PE, 1994, ENVIRON TOXICOL CHEM, V13, P1341, DOI 10.1897/1552-8618(1994)13[1341:SRTPOS]2.0.CO
[8]  
2
[9]   An initial evaluation of the use of Euro/North American fish species for tropical effects assessments [J].
Dyer, SD ;
Belanger, SE ;
Carr, GJ .
CHEMOSPHERE, 1997, 35 (11) :2767-2781
[10]   Species sensitivity distributions revisited: A critical appraisal [J].
Forbes, VE ;
Calow, P .
HUMAN AND ECOLOGICAL RISK ASSESSMENT, 2002, 8 (03) :473-492