Food security outcomes in agricultural systems models: Current status and recommended improvements

被引:58
作者
Nicholson, Charles F. [1 ,2 ]
Stephens, Emma C. [3 ]
Kopainsky, Birgit [4 ]
Jones, Andrew D. [5 ]
Parsons, David [6 ,7 ]
Garrett, James [8 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Nijmegen Sch Management, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Cornell Univ, Sch Integrat Plant Sci, Ithaca, NY 14853 USA
[3] Agr & Agri Food, Lethbridge Res & Dev Ctr, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Bergen, Bergen, Norway
[5] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[6] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Uppsala, Sweden
[7] Tasmanian Inst Agr, Hobart, Tas, Australia
[8] Biovers Int, Louvain, Belgium
关键词
Food security; Agricultural systems models; Food access; Stability; CROP-LIVESTOCK SYSTEMS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; DIETARY DIVERSITY; RURAL HOUSEHOLDS; SMALLHOLDER FARMERS; BURKINA-FASO; LAND-USE; NUTRITION SECURITY; EMPIRICAL-EVIDENCE; MAIZE PRODUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.agsy.2020.103028
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Improvement of food security is a common objective for many agricultural systems analyses, but how food security has been conceptualized and evaluated within agricultural systems has not been systematically evaluated. We reviewed the literature on agricultural systems analyses of food security at the household- and regionallevels, finding that the primary focus is on only one dimension of food security-agricultural output as a proxy for food availability. Given that food security comprises availability, access, utilization and stability dimensions, improved practice would involve more effort to incorporate food access and stability indicators into agricultural systems models. The empirical evidence base for including food access indicators and their determinants within agricultural systems models requires further development through appropriate short and longterm investments in data collection and analysis. Assessment of the stability dimension of food security (through time) is also particularly under-represented in previous work and requires the development and application of appropriate dynamic models of agricultural systems that include food security indicators, coupled with more formalized treatment of robustness and adaptability at both the regional and household levels. We find that agricultural systems models often conflate analysis of food security covariates that have the potential to improve food security (like agricultural yields) with an assessment of food security itself. Agricultural systems modelers should exercise greater caution in referring to analyses of agricultural output and food availability as representing food security more generally.
引用
收藏
页数:28
相关论文
共 186 条
[1]  
Abonesh Tesfaye Abonesh Tesfaye, 2008, Irrigation and Drainage Systems, V22, P145, DOI 10.1007/s10795-008-9047-5
[2]  
Adewumi M.O., 2013, EC INFORM, V5, P3
[3]   Factors Influencing Nutritional Adequacy among Rural Households in Nigeria: How Does Dietary Diversity Stand among Influencers? [J].
Akerele, D. ;
Sanusi, R. A. ;
Fadare, O. A. ;
Ashaolu, O. F. .
ECOLOGY OF FOOD AND NUTRITION, 2017, 56 (02) :187-203
[4]  
Akerele D, 2017, INT J SOC ECON, V44, P1597, DOI 10.1108/IJSE-03-2016-0080
[5]  
Akinola AA, 2009, J FOOD AGRIC ENVIRON, V7, P496
[6]   The impacts of food price and income shocks on household food security and economic well-being: Evidence from rural Bangladesh [J].
Akter, Sonia ;
Basher, Syed Abul .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2014, 25 :150-162
[7]   Assessing farmer use of climate change adaptation practices and impacts on food security and poverty in Pakistan [J].
Ali, Akhter ;
Erenstein, Olaf .
CLIMATE RISK MANAGEMENT, 2017, 16 :183-194
[8]   Labor shortages on small landholdings in Malawi: Implications for policy reforms [J].
Alwang, J ;
Siegel, PB .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 1999, 27 (08) :1461-1475
[9]   MODELLING CROP-LIVESTOCK SYSTEMS FOR ACHIEVING FOOD SECURITY AND INCREASING PRODUCTION EFFICIENCIES IN THE ETHIOPIAN HIGHLANDS [J].
Amede, Tilahun ;
Delve, Robert J. .
EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 2008, 44 (04) :441-452
[10]  
Ancona A, 2017, LUBRICANTS, V5, DOI 10.3390/lubricants5040041