Insulin sensitivity and insulin secretion determined by homeostasis model assessment and risk of diabetes in a multiethnic cohort of women - The Women's Health Initiative Observational Study

被引:270
作者
Song, Yiqing
Manson, JoAnn E.
Tinker, Lesley
Howard, Barbara V.
Kuller, Lewis H.
Nathan, Lauren
Rifai, Nader
Liu, Simin
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Med, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Brigham & Womens Hosp, Div Prevent Med, Dept Med, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[5] Fred Hutchinson Canc Res Ctr, Div Publ Hlth, Seattle, WA 98104 USA
[6] MedStar Res Inst, Washington, DC USA
[7] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Epidemiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[8] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Los Angeles, CA 90024 USA
[9] Childrens Hosp, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
IMPAIRED GLUCOSE-TOLERANCE; PLASMA-INSULIN; RESISTANCE; NONOBESE; AMERICANS; INDEXES;
D O I
10.2337/dc07-0358
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE - The homeostasis model assessment (HOMA), based on plasma levels of fasting glucose and insulin. has been widely validated and applied for quantifying insulin resistance and P-cell function. However, prospective data regarding its relation to diabetes risk in ethnically diverse populations are limited. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - Among 82,069 women who were aged 50-79 years, free of cardiovascular disease or diabetes, and participating in the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study, we conducted a nested case-control study to prospectively examine the relations of HOMA of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and beta-cell function (HOMA-B) with diabetes risk. During a median follow-up period of 5.9 years, 1,584 diabetic patients were 0 matched with 2,198 control subjects by age, ethnicity, clinical center, time of blood draw, and follow-up time. RESULTS - Baseline levels of fasting glucose, insulin, and HOMA-IR were each significantly higher among case compared with control subjects, while HOMA-B was lower (all P values < 0.0001). After adjustment for matching factors and diabetes risk factors, all four markers were significantly associated with diabetes risk the estimated relative risks per SD increment 0 1 were 3.54 (95% CI 3.02-4.13) for fasting glucose, 2.25 (1.99-2.54) for fasting insulin, 3.40 (2.95-3.92) for HOMA-IR. and 0.57(0.51-0.63) for HOMA-B. While no statistically significant multiplicative interactions were observed between these markers and ethnicity, the associations of both HOMA-IR and HOMA-B with diabetes risk remained significant and robust in each ethnic Group, including whites, blacks, Hispanics, and Asians/Pacific Islanders. When evaluated jointly. the relations of HOMA-IR and HOMA-B with diabetes risk appeared to be independent and additive. HOMA -IR was more strongly associated with an increased risk than were other markers after we excluded those with fasting glucose >= 126 mg/dl at baseline.
引用
收藏
页码:1747 / 1752
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Implementation of the Women's Health Initiative Study Design
    Anderson, GL
    Manson, J
    Wallace, R
    Lund, B
    Hall, D
    Davis, S
    Shumaker, S
    Wang, CY
    Stein, E
    Prentice, RL
    [J]. ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2003, 13 (09) : S5 - S17
  • [2] Assessment of insulin sensitivity from plasma insulin and glucose in the fasting or post oral glucose-load state
    Avignon, A
    Boegner, C
    Mariano-Goulart, D
    Colette, C
    Monnier, L
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBESITY, 1999, 23 (05) : 512 - 517
  • [3] Population-based incidence rates and risk factors for a type 2 diabetes in white individuals - The Bruneck study
    Bonora, E
    Kiechl, S
    Willeit, J
    Oberhollenzer, F
    Egger, G
    Meigs, JB
    Bonadonna, RC
    Muggeo, M
    [J]. DIABETES, 2004, 53 (07) : 1782 - 1789
  • [4] Homeostasis model assessment closely mirrors the glucose clamp technique in the assessment of insulin sensitivity - Studies in subjects with various degrees of glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity
    Bonora, E
    Saggiani, F
    Targher, G
    Zenere, MB
    Alberiche, M
    Monauni, T
    Bonadonna, RC
    Muggeo, M
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2000, 23 (01) : 57 - 63
  • [5] Homeostasis model assessment as a clinical index of insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients treated with sulfonylureas
    Emoto, M
    Nishizawa, Y
    Maekawa, K
    Hiura, Y
    Kanda, H
    Kawagishi, T
    Shoji, T
    Okuno, Y
    Morii, H
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 1999, 22 (05) : 818 - 822
  • [6] Comparison of several insulin sensitivity indices derived from basal plasma insulin and glucose levels with minimal model indices
    García-Estévez, DA
    Araújo-Vilar, D
    Fiestras-Janeiro, G
    Saavedra-González, A
    Cabezas-Cerrato, J
    [J]. HORMONE AND METABOLIC RESEARCH, 2003, 35 (01) : 13 - 17
  • [7] The homeostasis model in the San Antonio Heart Study
    Haffner, SM
    Miettinen, H
    Stern, MP
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 1997, 20 (07) : 1087 - 1092
  • [8] A prospective analysis of the HOMA model - The Mexico City Diabetes Study
    Haffner, SM
    Gonzalez, C
    Miettinen, H
    Kennedy, E
    Stern, MP
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 1996, 19 (10) : 1138 - 1141
  • [9] Prediction of type 2 diabetes using simple measures of insulin resistance - Combined results from the San Antonio Heart Study, the Mexico City Diabetes Study, and the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study
    Hanley, AJG
    Williams, K
    Gonzalez, C
    D'Agostino, RB
    Wagenknecht, LE
    Stern, MP
    Haffner, SM
    [J]. DIABETES, 2003, 52 (02) : 463 - 469
  • [10] Visceral adiposity and the risk of impaired glucose tolerance - A prospective study among Japanese Americans
    Hayashi, T
    Boyko, EJ
    Leonetti, DL
    McNeely, MJ
    Newell-Morris, L
    Kahn, SE
    Fujimoto, WY
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2003, 26 (03) : 650 - 655