Influencing factors of public support for modern coal-fired power plant projects: An empirical study from China

被引:31
作者
Liu, Feng [1 ]
Lyu, Tao [1 ]
Pan, Li [1 ]
Wang, Fei [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Management, Inst Energy Econ & Management, Xuzhou 221116, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
高等学校博士学科点专项科研基金; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Modern coal-fired power plant; NIMBY; Environmental awareness; Public support; Clean coal technology; RENEWABLE ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES; PLACE ATTACHMENT; IDENTITY PROCESSES; GRID INTEGRATION; LOCAL IDENTITY; ACCEPTANCE; ELECTRICITY; TRUST; DETERMINANTS; PERCEPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.017
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
With the development of clean coal technology, modern coal-fired power plants have achieved the similar emission standards as gas power plants. However, due to the impressions of high pollution and high emission in traditional coal-fired power plants, such projects are often opposed by local residents, which hinder the promotion of this technology. This manuscript aims to investigate public attitudes toward these projects and to analyze the influencing mechanisms of the factors of public support. The conceptual model was built with sense of place, trust and environmental attitude as the independent variables, benefit and cost perceptions as the mediating variables and public support as the dependent variable. The model was tested and modified by structural equation modelling. The results revealed that sense of place had a slight indirect impact (-0.043) on public support through benefit perception, whereas trust had a direct impact (0.332) on public support and indirect impacts (0.298) through benefit and cost perceptions. Environmental attitude had indirect impacts on public support through benefit perception (0.180) and cost perception (-0.115). In addition, policy suggestions on decision-making, project publicity and compensation strategy are proposed to enhance public support for similar projects.
引用
收藏
页码:398 / 406
页数:9
相关论文
共 66 条
[51]   Major psychological factors determining public acceptance of the siting of nuclear facilities [J].
Tanaka, Y .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 34 (06) :1147-1165
[52]   Clean coal use in China: Challenges and policy implications [J].
Tang, Xu ;
Snowden, Simon ;
McLellan, Benjamin C. ;
Hook, Mikael .
ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 87 :517-523
[53]   Estimating determinants of public acceptance of hydrogen vehicles and refuelling stations in greater Stavanger [J].
Tarigan, Ari K. M. ;
Bayer, Stian B. ;
Langhelle, Oluf ;
Thesen, Gunnar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2012, 37 (07) :6063-6073
[54]  
Twiggerross C. L., 2009, J EXP BIOL 13, V212, P2119
[55]   Identifying and explaining public preferences for the attributes of energy technologies [J].
van Rijnsoever, Frank J. ;
Farla, Jacco C. M. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 31 :71-82
[56]   Climate change benefits and energy supply benefits as determinants of acceptance of nuclear power stations: Investigating an explanatory model [J].
Visschers, Vivianne H. M. ;
Keller, Carmen ;
Siegrist, Michael .
ENERGY POLICY, 2011, 39 (06) :3621-3629
[57]  
[汪德根 Wang Degen], 2011, [地理学报, Acta Geographica Sinica], V66, P1413
[58]   Analysis of the market penetration of clean coal technologies and its impacts in China's electricity sector [J].
Wang, Hao ;
Nakata, Toshihiko .
ENERGY POLICY, 2009, 37 (01) :338-351
[59]   The Future of Nuclear Power: Value Orientations and Risk Perception [J].
Whitfield, Stephen C. ;
Rosa, Eugene A. ;
Dan, Amy ;
Dietz, Thomas .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2009, 29 (03) :425-437
[60]   Environmental meaning and ecosystem management: Perspectives from environmental psychology and human geography [J].
Williams, DR ;
Patterson, ME .
SOCIETY & NATURAL RESOURCES, 1996, 9 (05) :507-521