TEACHING CRITICAL THINKING WITH RATIONALE

被引:0
作者
ter Berg, Timo [1 ]
van der Brugge, Eva [2 ]
机构
[1] Utrecht Univ Appl Sci, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic 3010, Australia
来源
7TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE (INTED2013) | 2013年
关键词
Critical Thinking; Higher Education; Generic Skills; Argumentation; Academic Writing; Reasoning; Software; Online Learning; Course Development; Mastery Learning; PEER;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Although critical thinking is increasingly central in undergraduate education, most courses dedicated to improving students' critical thinking skills produce only slight results. Many students struggle to analyse arguments and fail to acquire transferable skills without dedicated practice. We present a method to teach critical thinking that has been shown to be very effective. This method emphasises deliberate practice of reasoning skills by argument mapping, a technique to visualise the underlying logical structure of argumentation. Empirical evidence suggests that practice with argument maps results in improved critical thinking, as measured by various standardised tests. This improvement is seen also in situations where students are not using argument maps. We present Rationale, software that has been developed to facilitate the implementation of this technique into teaching practice, and show how it has been used in classrooms internationally. Further, we present an innovative experimental course currently underway, which combines argument mapping with a number of innovative pedagogical techniques such as mastery learning, peer instruction and peer assessment.
引用
收藏
页码:5145 / 5150
页数:6
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2007, THESIS U MELBOURNE
[2]  
Arum R., 2010, Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses
[3]  
Crouch C.H., 2007, Research-Based Reform of University Physics, V1, P40
[4]  
Davies M., 2011, NEW MEDIA NEW LITERA
[5]   The use of self-, peer and co-assessment in higher education: a review [J].
Dochy, F ;
Segers, M ;
Sluijsmans, D .
STUDIES IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 1999, 24 (03) :331-350
[6]   Student interaction characteristics during collaborative group testing [J].
Giuliodori, Mauricio J. ;
Lujan, Heidi L. ;
DiCarlo, Stephen E. .
ADVANCES IN PHYSIOLOGY EDUCATION, 2009, 33 (01) :24-29
[8]  
Hitchcock D., 2003, INFORM LOGIC 25
[9]   EFFECTIVENESS OF MASTERY LEARNING-PROGRAMS - A METAANALYSIS [J].
KULIK, CLC ;
KULIK, JA ;
BANGERTDROWNS, RL .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1990, 60 (02) :265-299
[10]   Why Peer Discussion Improves Student Performance on In-Class Concept Questions [J].
Smith, M. K. ;
Wood, W. B. ;
Adams, W. K. ;
Wieman, C. ;
Knight, J. K. ;
Guild, N. ;
Su, T. T. .
SCIENCE, 2009, 323 (5910) :122-124