Identifying Patients Who May Benefit from Liver Resection Compared to Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using 18F-FDG PET

被引:1
|
作者
Yoh, Tomoaki [1 ]
Seo, Satoru [1 ]
Taura, Kojiro [1 ]
Hamaguchi, Yuhei [2 ]
Ogiso, Satoshi [1 ]
Fukumitsu, Ken [1 ]
Ishii, Takamichi [1 ]
Hata, Koichiro [1 ]
Kaido, Toshimi [3 ]
Nakamoto, Yuji [4 ]
Uemoto, Shinji [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Div Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg & Transplantat, Dept Surg,Sakyo Ku, 54 Kawahara Cho, Kyoto 6068507, Japan
[2] Osaka Red Cross Hosp, Dept Surg, Osaka, Japan
[3] St Lukes Int Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Gen Surg, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Kyoto Univ, Dept Diagnost Imaging & Nucl Med, Kyoto, Japan
关键词
SURVIVAL; RECURRENCE; MANAGEMENT; INTENTION; CANCER; TREAT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s00268-021-06235-9
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background This study aimed to assess an oncologic setting where patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) could benefit from liver resection (LR) compared to living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography. Methods The consecutive data of patients with HCC who underwent F-18-FDG PET before LR (LR group, n = 314) and LDLT (LDLT group, n = 65) between 2003 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Tumor F-18-FDG avidity was quantified as the tumor to liver standardized uptake value ratio (TLR, cut-off value was defined at 2). Multivariate analysis was performed to assess significant preoperative tumor factors in the LR group. Survival outcomes between the two groups were stratified by these factors. Results The 5-year overall survival (OS: 56.9% vs. 73.8%, LR vs. LDLT, p < 0.001) and recurrence-free survival rate (RFS: 27.4% vs. 70.7%, p < 0.001) were significantly better in the LDLT group compared to the LR group. In the LR study, multivariate analysis identified TLR and tumor multiplicity as significant preoperative tumor factors for OS. In patients with solitary and TLR < 2 HCC, the 5-year OS rate was not significantly different between the LR and LDLT groups (70.3% vs. 71.8%, p = 0.352); meanwhile, RFS rate was better in the LDLT group (34.3% vs. 71.8%, p = 0.001). Conclusions LDLT is associated with better long-term outcomes than LR in patients with HCC; however, selected patients with solitary and TLR < 2 HCC may benefit from LR.
引用
收藏
页码:3395 / 3403
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients May Benefit From Postoperative Huaier Aqueous Extract After Liver Transplantation
    Lei, J. Y.
    Yan, L. N.
    Zhu, J. Q.
    Wang, W. T.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2015, 47 (10) : 2920 - 2924
  • [32] Composite criteria using clinical and FDG PET/CT factors for predicting recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after living donor liver transplantation
    Kang, Yeon-koo
    Choi, Joon Young
    Paeng, Jin Chul
    Kim, Yong-il
    Kwon, Hyun Woo
    Cheon, Gi Jeong
    Suh, Kyung-Suk
    Kwon, Choon Hyuck David
    Lee, Dong Soo
    Kang, Keon Wook
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (11) : 6009 - 6017
  • [33] Composite criteria using clinical and FDG PET/CT factors for predicting recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after living donor liver transplantation
    Yeon-koo Kang
    Joon Young Choi
    Jin Chul Paeng
    Yong-il Kim
    Hyun Woo Kwon
    Gi Jeong Cheon
    Kyung-Suk Suh
    Choon Hyuck David Kwon
    Dong Soo Lee
    Keon Wook Kang
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 6009 - 6017
  • [34] Living donor liver transplantation does not increase tumor recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma compared to deceased donor transplantation
    Xiao, Guang-Qin
    Song, Jiu-Lin
    Shen, Shu
    Yang, Jia-Yin
    Yan, Lu-Nan
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2014, 20 (31) : 10953 - 10959
  • [35] Clinical outcome in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after living-donor liver transplantation
    Choi, Ho Joong
    Kim, Dong Goo
    Na, Gun Hyung
    Han, Jae Hyun
    Hong, Tae Ho
    You, Young Kyoung
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 19 (29) : 4737 - 4744
  • [36] Effectiveness of Locoregional Therapy Before Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Who Meet the Milan Criteria
    Kim, J. M.
    Kwon, C. H. D.
    Joh, J-W.
    Choi, M. S.
    Lee, J. H.
    Koh, K. C.
    Paik, S. W.
    Kim, G. S.
    Kim, S. J.
    Lee, S-K.
    Yoo, B. C.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2012, 44 (02) : 403 - 408
  • [37] Extended Criteria for Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Choi, H. J.
    Kim, D. G.
    Na, G. H.
    Hong, T. H.
    You, Y. K.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2012, 44 (02) : 399 - 402
  • [38] Improved Results of a Surgical Resection for the Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Living Donor Liver Transplantation
    Taketomi, Akinobu
    Fukuhara, Takasuke
    Morita, Kazutoyo
    Kayashima, Hiroto
    Ninomiya, Mizuki
    Yamashita, Yoichi
    Ikegami, Toru
    Uchiyama, Hideaki
    Yoshizumi, Tomoharu
    Soejima, Yuji
    Shirabe, Ken
    Maehara, Yoshihko
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2010, 17 (09) : 2283 - 2289
  • [39] Clinical analysis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after living-donor liver transplantation
    Na, Gun Hyung
    Hong, Tae Ho
    You, Young Kyoung
    Kim, Dong Goo
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2016, 22 (25) : 5790 - 5799
  • [40] Inflammation-based Prognostic Score in Patients with Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Harimoto, Norifumi
    Yoshizumi, Tomoharu
    Shimagaki, Tomonari
    Nagatsu, Akihisa
    Motomura, Takashi
    Harada, Noboru
    Okabe, Hirohisa
    Itoh, Shinji
    Ikegami, Toru
    Uchiyama, Hideaki
    Soejima, Yuji
    Maehara, Yoshihiko
    ANTICANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 36 (10) : 5537 - 5542