Identifying Patients Who May Benefit from Liver Resection Compared to Living Donor Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using 18F-FDG PET

被引:1
|
作者
Yoh, Tomoaki [1 ]
Seo, Satoru [1 ]
Taura, Kojiro [1 ]
Hamaguchi, Yuhei [2 ]
Ogiso, Satoshi [1 ]
Fukumitsu, Ken [1 ]
Ishii, Takamichi [1 ]
Hata, Koichiro [1 ]
Kaido, Toshimi [3 ]
Nakamoto, Yuji [4 ]
Uemoto, Shinji [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyoto Univ, Grad Sch Med, Div Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg & Transplantat, Dept Surg,Sakyo Ku, 54 Kawahara Cho, Kyoto 6068507, Japan
[2] Osaka Red Cross Hosp, Dept Surg, Osaka, Japan
[3] St Lukes Int Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol & Gen Surg, Tokyo, Japan
[4] Kyoto Univ, Dept Diagnost Imaging & Nucl Med, Kyoto, Japan
关键词
SURVIVAL; RECURRENCE; MANAGEMENT; INTENTION; CANCER; TREAT; MODEL;
D O I
10.1007/s00268-021-06235-9
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background This study aimed to assess an oncologic setting where patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) could benefit from liver resection (LR) compared to living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) using F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography. Methods The consecutive data of patients with HCC who underwent F-18-FDG PET before LR (LR group, n = 314) and LDLT (LDLT group, n = 65) between 2003 and 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. Tumor F-18-FDG avidity was quantified as the tumor to liver standardized uptake value ratio (TLR, cut-off value was defined at 2). Multivariate analysis was performed to assess significant preoperative tumor factors in the LR group. Survival outcomes between the two groups were stratified by these factors. Results The 5-year overall survival (OS: 56.9% vs. 73.8%, LR vs. LDLT, p < 0.001) and recurrence-free survival rate (RFS: 27.4% vs. 70.7%, p < 0.001) were significantly better in the LDLT group compared to the LR group. In the LR study, multivariate analysis identified TLR and tumor multiplicity as significant preoperative tumor factors for OS. In patients with solitary and TLR < 2 HCC, the 5-year OS rate was not significantly different between the LR and LDLT groups (70.3% vs. 71.8%, p = 0.352); meanwhile, RFS rate was better in the LDLT group (34.3% vs. 71.8%, p = 0.001). Conclusions LDLT is associated with better long-term outcomes than LR in patients with HCC; however, selected patients with solitary and TLR < 2 HCC may benefit from LR.
引用
收藏
页码:3395 / 3403
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in liver transplantation for hepatocarcinoma
    Olivier Detry
    Laurence Govaerts
    Arnaud Deroover
    Morgan Vandermeulen
    Nicolas Meurisse
    Serge Malenga
    Noella Bletard
    Charles Mbendi
    Anne Lamproye
    Pierre Honoré
    Paul Meunier
    Jean Delwaide
    Roland Hustinx
    World Journal of Gastroenterology, 2015, 21 (10) : 3049 - 3054
  • [22] Outcomes of Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Patients With a History of Ruptured Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Lee, Hwi Yeol
    Hong, Suk Kyun
    Hong, Su Young
    Suh, Sanggyun
    Han, Eui Soo
    Lee, Jeong-Moo
    Choi, YoungRok
    Yi, Nam-Joon
    Lee, Kwang-Woong
    Suh, Kyung-Suk
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2021, 8
  • [23] Survival after liver resection and liver transplantation for colorectal liver metastases: a comparative analysis stratified by metabolic tumor volume assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT
    Grut, Harald
    Line, Pal-Dag
    Labori, Knut J.
    Schulz, Anselm
    Dueland, Svein
    HPB, 2022, 24 (07) : 1055 - 1062
  • [24] The potential of 18F-FDG PET/CT metabolic parameter-based nomogram in predicting the microvascular invasion of hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation
    Jiang, Shengpan
    Gao, Xiaoqing
    Tian, Yueli
    Chen, Jie
    Wang, Yichun
    Jiang, Yaqun
    He, Yong
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2024, 49 (05) : 1444 - 1455
  • [25] F18-FDG-PET evaluation of patients for resection of colorectal liver metastases
    Haguet, E. L.
    Praseedom, R. K.
    Balan, K. K.
    Gibbs, P.
    Jamieson, N. V.
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2007, 54 (78) : 1667 - 1671
  • [26] Two-step Selection Criteria for Living Donor Liver Transplantation in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma
    Yoshizumi, T.
    Ikegami, T.
    Toshima, T.
    Harimoto, N.
    Uchiyama, H.
    Soejima, Y.
    Yamashita, Y.
    Shirabe, K.
    Maehara, Y.
    TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2013, 45 (09) : 3310 - 3313
  • [27] Liver resection versus liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma within Milan criteria: a meta-analysis of 18,421 patients
    Koh, Jin Hean
    Tan, Darren Jun Hao
    Ong, Yuki
    Lim, Wen Hui
    Ng, Cheng Han
    Tay, Phoebe Wen Lin
    Yong, Jie Ning
    Muthiah, Mark D.
    Tan, Eunice X.
    Pang, Ning Qi
    Kim, Beom Kyung
    Syn, Nicholas
    Kow, Alfred
    Goh, Brian K. P.
    Huang, Daniel Q.
    HEPATOBILIARY SURGERY AND NUTRITION, 2022, 11 (01) : 78 - +
  • [28] PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF 18F-FDG PET-CT IN LIVER TRANSPLANTATION FOR HEPATOCARCINOMA
    Meurisse, N.
    Detry, O.
    Govaerts, L.
    Deroover, A.
    Vandermeulen, M.
    Malenga, S.
    Bletard, N.
    Mbendi, C.
    Lamproye, A.
    Honore, P.
    Meunier, P.
    Delwaide, J.
    Hustinx, R.
    TRANSPLANT INTERNATIONAL, 2014, 27 : 18 - 18
  • [29] Resection of lung metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma after living donor liver transplantation: Report of two cases
    Togashi, Junichi
    Sugawara, Yasuhiko
    Aoki, Taku
    Tamura, Sumihito
    Kaneko, Junichi
    Nakajima, Jun
    Sano, Atsushi
    Kokudo, Norihiro
    SURGERY TODAY, 2011, 41 (09) : 1294 - 1297
  • [30] Prognostic significance of parameters from pretreatment 18F-FDG PET in hepatocellular carcinoma: a meta-analysis
    Sun, Da-Wei
    An, Lin
    Wei, Feng
    Mu, Lin
    Shi, Xiao-Ju
    Wang, Chuan-Lei
    Zhao, Zheng-Wei
    Li, Teng-Fei
    Lv, Guo-Yue
    ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2016, 41 (01) : 33 - 41