The effect of enterprise risk management on financial performance and firm value: the role of environmental, social and governance performance

被引:44
作者
Chairani, Chairani [1 ]
Siregar, Sylvia Veronica [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Indonesia, Dept Accounting, Fac Econ & Business, Depok, Indonesia
关键词
Enterprise risk management (ERM); Environmental; social and governance (ESG); Financial performance; Firm value; ASEAN; 5; IMPACT; RESPONSIBILITY; DETERMINANTS; INDUSTRIES;
D O I
10.1108/MEDAR-09-2019-0549
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Purpose - This study aims to examine the effect of enterprise risk management (ERM) on financial performance and firm value, as well as the moderating role of environmental, social and governance (ESG) performance. Design/methodology/approach - The samples in this study are listed companies in the ASEAN 5 (Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Singapore and Thailand) during the years 2014-2018, with total observations of 680 firm-years. Fixed effect panel data regressions were used to test the hypotheses. The data was collected from Financial Report, Annual Reports and Thomson Reuters. Findings - The results show that ERM has a positive significant effect on financial performance and firm value. This paper also finds that ESG has a significant moderating role in increasing the effect of ERM on firm value. Further, this paper divides the samples into sensitive and non-sensitive industries and find a significant moderating role of ESG performance on firm performance for sensitive industries. Originality/value - Extant studies have not empirically examined the moderating role of ESG on the effect of ERM on firm performance and firm value. The findings have important implications in suggesting that firms need to analyze various threats and opportunities related to and ESG risks in achieving competitive advantage.
引用
收藏
页码:647 / 670
页数:24
相关论文
共 63 条
[21]   Moderating influences on the ERM maturity-performance relationship [J].
Farrell, Mark ;
Gallagher, Ronan .
RESEARCH IN INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS AND FINANCE, 2019, 47 :616-628
[22]   Enterprise risk management and firm performance: The Italian case [J].
Florio, Cristina ;
Leoni, Giulia .
BRITISH ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2017, 49 (01) :56-74
[23]  
Fong-Woon L., 2017, Global Business and Management Research, V9, P338
[24]   Green marketing strategy and the firm's performance: the moderating role of environmental culture [J].
Fraj, Elena ;
Martinez, Eva ;
Matute, Jorge .
JOURNAL OF STRATEGIC MARKETING, 2011, 19 (04) :339-355
[25]  
Freeman R., 1983, Advances in strategic management, V1, P31
[26]  
Freeman R.E., 2010, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139192675
[27]   Sensitive industries produce better ESG performance: Evidence from emerging markets [J].
Garcia, Alexandre Sanches ;
Mendes-Da-Silva, Wesley ;
Orsato, Renato J. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 150 :135-147
[28]   Incorporating Strategic Risk into Enterprise Risk Management: A Survey of Current Corporate Practice [J].
Gates, Stephen .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CORPORATE FINANCE, 2006, 18 (04) :81-+
[29]   THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND SHAREHOLDER VALUE: AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF THE RISK MANAGEMENT HYPOTHESIS [J].
Godfrey, Paul C. ;
Merrill, Craig B. ;
Hansen, Jared M. .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2009, 30 (04) :425-445
[30]   Enterprise risk management and firm performance: A contingency perspective [J].
Gordon, Lawrence A. ;
Loeb, Martin P. ;
Tseng, Chih-Yang .
JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2009, 28 (04) :301-327