Sandglass-type product specification management method for supporting modular design of semiconductor manufacturing equipment

被引:1
作者
Cho, Daeseung [1 ]
Han, Jeongho [2 ]
Yang, Jeongsam [2 ]
机构
[1] PSK Inc, Innovat Secur Grp, Hwaseong 445170, South Korea
[2] Ajou Univ, Dept Ind Engn, Suwon 443749, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Mass customization; Modular design; Product specification management; Sandglass-type; Semiconductor manufacturing equipment;
D O I
10.1007/s12206-016-0434-9
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
The product life cycle for semiconductor manufacturing facilities has been significantly reduced as a result of the technological advancement of the semiconductor manufacturing process and the expansion of its demand. To ensure long-term market competitiveness under this environment, many companies attempt to convert their systems into mass customization production systems. In general, the specification management for semiconductor manufacturing equipment has adopted the method of making the bill of materials structure of the existing equipment into a new one based on the same physical structure and then customizing it according to a customer's demands in the detail design phase. However, this method results in longer lead times and difficulties maintaining data consistency due to frequent design changes in connection with various derived products. We suggest a sandglass-type product specification management method to efficiently reflect varying and versatile requirements in product development and shorten the design lead time. In addition, we propose a method to support the modular design of semiconductor manufacturing equipment by classifying the standard specifications for a final product into product component and part component specifications. Finally, we develop a closed-loop product specification management system called NEXUS using our method, and apply this system to semiconductor manufacturing processes.
引用
收藏
页码:2243 / 2256
页数:14
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Model-based definition design in the product lifecycle management scenario [J].
Alemanni, M. ;
Destefanis, F. ;
Vezzetti, E. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 52 (1-4) :1-14
[2]  
Austin S., 2000, Construction Management and Economics, V18, P173, DOI DOI 10.1080/014461900370807
[3]   THE MANAGEMENT OF ENGINEERING CHANGE PROCEDURE [J].
DALE, BG .
ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT INTERNATIONAL, 1982, 1 (03) :201-208
[4]  
Diprima Mike., 1982, PRODUCT. INVENT. MGMT, V23, P81
[5]   Product modularity: measures and design methods [J].
Gershenson, JK ;
Prasad, GJ ;
Zhang, Y .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2004, 15 (01) :33-51
[6]  
Gu P, 1997, CIRP ANNALS 1997 MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, VOLUME 46/1/1997, V46, P71
[7]   Systematic module and interface definition using component design structure matrix [J].
Helmer, Robert ;
Yassine, Ali ;
Meier, Christoph .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING DESIGN, 2010, 21 (06) :647-675
[8]  
Holyoak V.L., 2014, COMPUT AIDED DES APP, V11, P560, DOI [10.1080/16864360.2014.902689, DOI 10.1080/16864360.2014.902689]
[9]  
Jarratt T, 2004, TOOLS AND METHODS OF COMPETITIVE ENGINEERING VOLS 1 AND 2, P331
[10]   Application of dependency structure matrix for activity sequencing in concurrent engineering projects [J].
Maheswari, JU ;
Varghese, K ;
Sridharan, T .
JOURNAL OF CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 132 (05) :482-490