Size effect and forming-limit strain prediction for microscale sheet metal forming of stainless steel 304

被引:26
作者
Chen, C-H [1 ]
Lee, R-S [1 ]
Gau, J-T [2 ]
机构
[1] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Tainan 701, Taiwan
[2] No Illinois Univ, Dept Mech Engn, De Kalb, IL 60115 USA
关键词
size effect; stainless steel 304 foils; microscale sheet metal forming; forming-limit diagram; DUCTILE FRACTURE; DEFORMATION PROCESSES; BEHAVIOR; STRESS; BRASS;
D O I
10.1243/03093247JSA585
中图分类号
TH [机械、仪表工业];
学科分类号
0802 ;
摘要
Owing to the extensive applications of stainless steel 304 on a microscale, a series of microscale tensile and dome height tests were conducted to investigate its size effects on mechanical properties and formability. Based on the experimental results and observations and the Oh et al. fracture criterion, two new models were proposed in this paper for predicting the forming limit of stainless steel 304 foils in microscale sheet metal forming. For the mechanical properties study, foils of four thicknesses (150 mu m, 100 mu m, 50 mu m, and 20 mu m) heat treated at four temperatures (900 degrees C, 950 degrees C, 1000 degrees C, and 1050 degrees C) were used for the experiments. For the formability prediction, the first proposed model includes the effect of the strain path while the second proposed model considers the coupling effects of both the strain path and the size effects. The first model is superior to the Oh et al. criterion with respect to predicting the forming-limit strain of the foils, but it is not suitable for foils that are thinner than 100 mu m. However, the second proposed model can be used for stainless steel 304 foils irrespective of their thicknesses and thickness-to-average-grain-size ratios T/D. It can also be concluded that the size effects must be considered in microformability when the foil thickness is smaller than 100 mu m.
引用
收藏
页码:283 / 299
页数:17
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], T ASME J APPL MECH
[2]   ON SIZE EFFECTS IN POLYCRYSTAL PLASTICITY [J].
ARMSTRONG, RW .
JOURNAL OF THE MECHANICS AND PHYSICS OF SOLIDS, 1961, 9 (03) :196-199
[3]   POSSIBLE EXPLANATION FOR UNEXPECTED DEPARTURES IN HYDROSTATIC TENSION-FRACTURE STRAIN RELATIONS [J].
ATKINS, AG .
METAL SCIENCE, 1981, 15 (02) :81-83
[4]  
Brozzo P., 1972, Sheet Metal Forming and Formability
[5]  
CHEN CH, 2008, ASME TECHNICAL PUBLI
[6]   An Experimental and Analytical Study on the Limit Drawing Ratio of Stainless Steel 304 Foils for Microsheet Forming [J].
Chen, Chi-Han ;
Gau, Jenn-Terng ;
Lee, Rong-Shean .
MATERIALS AND MANUFACTURING PROCESSES, 2009, 24 (12) :1256-1265
[7]   FRACTURE PREDICTION IN PLASTIC-DEFORMATION PROCESSES [J].
CLIFT, SE ;
HARTLEY, P ;
STURGESS, CEN ;
ROWE, GW .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCES, 1990, 32 (01) :1-17
[8]  
COCKCROFT MG, 1968, J I MET, V96, P33
[9]  
Freudenthal A.M., 1950, The Inelastic Behavior in Solids
[10]   An experimental study on size effects on flow stress and formability of aluminm and brass for microforming [J].
Gau, Jenn-Terng ;
Principe, Chris ;
Wang, Jyhwen .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 184 (1-3) :42-46