Formation control with mismatched compasses

被引:53
作者
Meng, Ziyang [1 ]
Anderson, Brian D. O. [2 ,3 ]
Hirche, Sandra [4 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Dept Precis Instrument, State Key Lab Precis Measurement Technol & Instru, Beijing 100084, Peoples R China
[2] Australian Natl Univ, GPO Box 4, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
[3] Natl ICT Australia, Canberra, ACT 2600, Australia
[4] Tech Univ Munich, Inst Informat Oriented Control, D-80290 Munich, Germany
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
Formation control; Mismatched compasses; Estimation and compensation algorithms; CONSENSUS; NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1016/j.automatica.2016.02.029
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
This article addresses the formation control problem with mismatched compasses. Depending on the sensing and communication technology, compass mismatches may arise due to biases in measurement, drift in inertial sensing despite initial alignment, and even spatial variations in the earth's magnetic field. To illustrate the key concepts underlying what happens, we first consider the two agent case and show that the agents converge to a fixed, but distorted formation exponentially fast. In contrast to the matched compass case, the formation is not asymptotically stationary. The distance error and the angular error between the actual final formation and the desired formation are explicitly given, as is the steady state velocity of the formation. The case of time-varying mismatched compasses is also studied. Based on the results, we then propose estimators to obtain the mismatched angle, which allow a compensation algorithm to be proposed such that the desired formation shape is achieved. Finally, the extensions to the n agent case are also considered and similar phenomena are encountered. Simulations are provided to validate the theoretical results. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:232 / 241
页数:10
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Belabbas A, 2012, IEEE DECIS CONTR P, P1445, DOI 10.1109/CDC.2012.6426284
[2]  
Cao M, 2011, COMMUN INF SYST, V11, P1
[3]   Robust rendezvous for mobile autonomous agents via proximity graphs. in arbitrary dimensions [J].
Cortes, Jorge ;
Martinez, Sonia ;
Bullo, Francesco .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2006, 51 (08) :1289-1298
[4]   Information flow and cooperative control of vehicle formations [J].
Fax, JA ;
Murray, RM .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2004, 49 (09) :1465-1476
[5]   Agreement over random networks [J].
Hatano, Y ;
Mesbahi, M .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2005, 50 (11) :1867-1872
[6]   Quasi-synchronization of heterogeneous dynamic networks via distributed impulsive control: Error estimation, optimization and design [J].
He, Wangli ;
Qian, Feng ;
Lam, James ;
Chen, Guanrong ;
Han, Qing-Long ;
Kurths, Juergen G. .
AUTOMATICA, 2015, 62 :249-262
[7]  
Jiang BM, 2013, IEEE DECIS CONTR P, P2746, DOI 10.1109/CDC.2013.6760298
[8]  
Khalil H., 2014, Control of Nonlinear Systems
[9]   Stabilisation of infinitesimally rigid formations of multi-robot networks [J].
Krick, Laura ;
Broucke, Mireille E. ;
Francis, Bruce A. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTROL, 2009, 82 (03) :423-439
[10]   Local control strategies for groups of mobile autonomous agents [J].
Lin, ZY ;
Broucke, M ;
Francis, B .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON AUTOMATIC CONTROL, 2004, 49 (04) :622-629