Making transdisciplinarity happen: Phase 0, or before the beginning

被引:33
作者
Horcea-Milcu, Andra-Ioana [1 ]
Leventon, Julia [2 ]
Lang, Daniel J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Babes Bolyai Univ, Hungarian Dept Biol & Ecol, Clinicilor 5-7, Cluj Napoca 400006, Romania
[2] Czech Acad Sci CzechGlobe, Global Change Res Inst, Belidla 986-4a, Brno 60300, Czech Republic
[3] Leuphana Univ Luneburg, Univ Allee 1, D-21335 Luneburg, Germany
关键词
Sustainability transformation; Sustainability initiatives; Co-creation; Co-design; Reflexivity; Leverage points; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE; SUSTAINABILITY TRANSFORMATIONS; LANDSCAPE DEVELOPMENT; KNOWLEDGE EXCHANGE; COPRODUCTION; FUTURE; PARTICIPATION; INTERFACE; SYSTEMS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2022.05.019
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Both within science and society, transdisciplinary approaches are increasingly employed to address today's sustainability challenges. Often transdisciplinary research processes are structured in three core phases: a) problem identification and formation of a common research object; b) co-production of solution-oriented and transferable knowledge; c) embedding co-produced knowledge through transdisciplinary reintegration. In all phases of this ideal-typical model, the involvement of non-academic actors is essential to meet the challenges of real-world problems, and of transformative research practices. Despite existing guidance for the core trans disciplinary process, its initiation often remains an uncharted area because of its strong context dependency. Based on a concrete transdisciplinary case study addressing sustainability transformation in Transylvania, we bring together our learned experience with initiating a transdisciplinary process using a research-driven approach. To this end, we introduce the notion of Phase 0, as an initiating phase prior to beginning an ideal typical transdisciplinary process. Within Phase 0, we propose three empirically and literature informed sub phases: Sub-Phase 0.1) selecting the case study; Sub-Phase 0.2) understanding the case study context from a transdisciplinary perspective; Sub-Phase 0.3) fostering premises for coming together. We outline the general rationale behind these sub-phases, and we illustrate how we carried out each sub-phase in practice. By deriving cross-cutting lessons from the three sub-phases, we enhance the practice of transdisciplinary sustainability research with the aim to leverage its transformative potential.
引用
收藏
页码:187 / 197
页数:11
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]  
ABSON DJ, 2017, AMBIO, V46, P30, DOI DOI 10.1007/S13280-016-0800-Y
[2]  
Augsburg T., 2014, WORLD FUTURE, V70, P233, DOI DOI 10.1080/02604027.2014.934639
[3]  
Backstrand K., 2003, GLOBAL ENVIRON POLIT, V3, P24, DOI DOI 10.1162/152638003322757916
[4]   Key features for more successful place-based sustainability research on social-ecological systems: a Programme on Ecosystem Change and Society (PECS) perspective [J].
Balvanera, Patricia ;
Daw, Tim M. ;
Gardner, Toby A. ;
Martin-Lopez, Berta ;
Norstrom, Albert V. ;
Speranza, Chinwe Ifejika ;
Spierenburg, Marja ;
Bennett, Elena M. ;
Farfan, Michelle ;
Hamann, Maike ;
Kittinger, John N. ;
Luthe, Tobias ;
Maass, Manuel ;
Peterson, Garry D. ;
Perez-Verdin, Gustavo .
ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2017, 22 (01)
[5]   Linking transdisciplinary research characteristics and quality to effectiveness: A comparative analysis of five research-for-development projects [J].
Belcher, Brian M. ;
Claus, Rachel ;
Davel, Rachel ;
Ramirez, Luisa F. .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & POLICY, 2019, 101 :192-203
[6]   Participatory analysis and action to promote agroecological food systems - methodological insights from a three-country initiative: Nicaragua, Senegal and England [J].
Bichler, Birgit ;
Wach, Elise ;
Ripoll, Santiago .
LANDBAUFORSCHUNG-JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AND ORGANIC AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2020, 70 (02) :157-168
[7]   The reality of transdisciplinarity: a framework-based self-reflection from science and practice leaders [J].
Binder, Claudia R. ;
Absenger-Helmli, Iris ;
Schilling, Thorsten .
SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2015, 10 (04) :545-562
[8]   Conflicting roles of researchers in sustainability transitions: balancing action and reflection [J].
Bulten, Ellen ;
Hessels, Laurens K. ;
Hordijk, Michaela ;
Segrave, Andrew J. .
SUSTAINABILITY SCIENCE, 2021, 16 (04) :1269-1283
[9]   A pluralistic and integrated approach to action-oriented knowledge for sustainability [J].
Caniglia, Guido ;
Luederitz, C. ;
von Wirth, T. ;
Fazey, I ;
Martin-Lopez, B. ;
Hondrila, K. ;
Konig, A. ;
von Wehrden, H. ;
Schapke, N. A. ;
Laubichler, M. D. ;
Lang, D. J. .
NATURE SUSTAINABILITY, 2021, 4 (02) :93-100
[10]   "I spent the first year drinking tea": Exploring Canadian university researchers' perspectives on community-based participatory research involving Indigenous peoples [J].
Castleden, Heather ;
Morgan, Vanessa Sloan ;
Lamb, Christopher .
CANADIAN GEOGRAPHER-GEOGRAPHE CANADIEN, 2012, 56 (02) :160-179