Accuracy of quantitative ultrasound parameters in the diagnosis of osteoporosis

被引:16
作者
Pais, Raluca [1 ]
Campean, Remus [2 ]
Simon, Siao-Pin [1 ]
Bolosiu, Calin R. [3 ]
Muntean, Laura [1 ]
Bolosiu, Horatiu D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med & Pharm Iuliu Hatieganu Cluj Napoca, Dept Internal Med & Rheumatol 2, Cluj Napoca 400012, Romania
[2] Univ Med & Pharm Iuliu Hatieganu Cluj Napoca, Dept Stat, Cluj Napoca 400012, Romania
[3] Univ Med & Pharm Iuliu Hatieganu Cluj Napoca, Dept Radiol, Cluj Napoca 400012, Romania
来源
CENTRAL EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE | 2010年 / 5卷 / 04期
关键词
Osteoporosis; Quantitative ultrasound; speed of sound; broadband ultrasound attenuation; T-Score; DXA; bone mineral density; X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; HIP FRACTURE RISK; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; BONE ULTRASOUND; T-SCORE; CALCANEUS; PREDICTION; MANAGEMENT; DEVICE; MEN;
D O I
10.2478/s11536-009-0076-8
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) is of increasing interest for evaluation of osteoporosis because, compared with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA), it is portable, less expensive, and radiation-free. The aim of our study was to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and cut-off values of quantitative ultrasound parameters in identifying patients with osteoporosis compared to the World Health Organization (WHO) standard definition. We performed a cross-sectional investigational study of 73 subjects, and determined total hip and lumbar spine T-scores by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) (Prodigy Advance Lunar-GE). The QUS parameters (broadband ultrasound attenuation [BUA], speed of sound, bone mineral density, the stiffness index, and QUS T-score) were determined with Sahara Hologic equipment. The AUC was 0.81 (95% CI 0.67-0.95, p < 0.05) for speed of sound (SOS) and 0.76 (95% CI 0.62-0.90, p < 0.05) for BUA for the patients with DXA T-scores a parts per thousand yen -1 DS; the cut-off values were 1542.2 meters per second for SOS and 63.3 dB/MHz for BUA. In patients with DXA T-scores a parts per thousand currency sign - 2.5 DS, AUC was 0.80 (95% CI 0.70-0.90, p < 0.05) for SOS, and 0.76 (95% CI 0.65-0.87, p < 0.05) for BUA. The cut-off values were 1504.95 meters per second for SOS and 49.5 dB/MHz for BUA. Pearson correlation coefficients were positive and statistically significant (> 50%) for all QUS parameters in both groups, (2-tailed, p < 0.05). QUS parameters correctly identified normal patients (false negative 34.21% and false positive 2.53%) and those with osteoporosis (false negative 8.55% and false positive 7.82%). The patients with QUS parameters between the cut-off values corresponding to DXA T-scores of -1 SD and - 2.5 SD should be further evaluated by DXA.
引用
收藏
页码:478 / 485
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   ULTRASOUND ATTENUATION OF THE CALCANEUS - A SENSITIVE AND SPECIFIC DISCRIMINATOR OF OSTEOPENIA IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN [J].
AGREN, M ;
KARELLAS, A ;
LEAHEY, D ;
MARKS, S ;
BARAN, D .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1991, 48 (04) :240-244
[2]   Identifying postmenopausal women with osteoporosis by calcaneal ultrasound, metacarpal digital X-ray radiogrammetry and phalangeal radiographic absorptiometry: a comparative study [J].
Boonen, S ;
Nijs, J ;
Borghs, H ;
Peeters, H ;
Vanderschueren, D ;
Luyten, FP .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 16 (01) :93-100
[3]   The role of quantitative ultrasound in predicting osteoporosis defined by dual X-ray absorptiometry [J].
Çetin, A ;
Ertürk, H ;
Çeliker, R ;
Sivri, A ;
Hasçelik, Z .
RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 20 (02) :55-59
[4]   Comparison of questionnaire and quantitative ultrasound techniques as screening tools for DXA [J].
Cook, RB ;
Collins, D ;
Tucker, J ;
Zioupos, P .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 16 (12) :1565-1575
[5]   Imaging ultrasonometry of the calcaneus: Optimum T-score thresholds for the identification of osteoporotic subjects [J].
Damilakis, J ;
Perisinakis, K ;
Gourtsoyiannis, N .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 68 (04) :219-224
[6]   Comparison of quantitative ultrasound parameters with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry in pre- and postmenopausal women [J].
Dubois, EFL ;
van den Bergh, JPW ;
Smals, AGH ;
van de Meerendonk, CWD ;
Zwinderman, AH ;
Schweitzer, DH .
NETHERLANDS JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 58 (02) :62-70
[7]   Discrimination of osteoporotic patients with quantitative ultrasound using imaging or non-imaging device [J].
Falgarone, G ;
Porcher, R ;
Duché, A ;
Kolta, S ;
Dougados, M ;
Roux, C .
JOINT BONE SPINE, 2004, 71 (05) :419-423
[8]   Can the WHO criteria for diagnosing osteoporosis be applied to calcaneal quantitative ultrasound? [J].
Frost, ML ;
Blake, GM ;
Fogelman, I .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 11 (04) :321-330
[9]   Device-specific weighted T-score for two quantitative ultrasounds: operational propositions for the management of osteoporosis for 65 years and older women in Switzerland [J].
Hans, D ;
Hartl, F ;
Krieg, MA .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 14 (03) :251-258
[10]   Ultrasonographic heel measurements to predict hip fracture in elderly women: The EPIDOS prospective study [J].
Hans, D ;
DargentMolina, P ;
Schott, AM ;
Sebert, JL ;
Cormier, C ;
Kotzki, PO ;
Delmas, PD ;
Pouilles, JM ;
Breart, G ;
Meunier, PJ .
LANCET, 1996, 348 (9026) :511-514