The impact of shared book reading on children's language skills: A meta-analysis

被引:156
作者
Noble, Claire [1 ]
Sala, Giovanni [2 ]
Peter, Michelle [1 ]
Lingwood, Jamie [3 ]
Rowland, Caroline [1 ,4 ]
Gobet, Fernand [1 ]
Pine, Julian [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, ESRC Int Ctr Language & Commun Dev LuCiD, Liverpool, Merseyside, England
[2] Osaka Univ, Osaka, Japan
[3] Univ Leeds, Leeds, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Max Planck Inst Psycholinguist, Nijmegen, Netherlands
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会; 日本学术振兴会;
关键词
Shared-book reading; Child directed speech; Meta-analysis; Language development; Socio-economic status; LOW-INCOME; PHONOLOGICAL AWARENESS; PUBLICATION BIAS; META-REGRESSION; LITERACY; INTERVENTION; PARENT; PRINT; ACQUISITION; VOCABULARY;
D O I
10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100290
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Shared book reading is thought to have a positive impact on young children's language development, with shared reading interventions often run in an attempt to boost children's language skills. However, despite the volume of research in this area, a number of issues remain outstanding. The current meta-analysis explored whether shared reading interventions are equally effective (a) across a range of study designs; (b) across a range of different outcome variables; and (c) for children from different SES groups. It also explored the potentially moderating effects of intervention duration, child age, use of dialogic reading techniques, person delivering the intervention and mode of intervention delivery. Our results show that, while there is an effect of shared reading on language development, this effect is smaller than reported in previous meta-analyses ((g) over bar = 0.194, p = .002). They also show that this effect is moderated by the type of control group used and is negligible in studies with active control groups ((g) over bar = 0.028, p = .703). Finally, they show no significant effects of differences in outcome variable (ps >= .286), socio-economic status (p = .658), or any of our other potential moderators (ps >= .077), and non-significant effects for studies with follow-ups ((g) over bar = 0.139, p = .200). On the basis of these results, we make a number of recommendations for researchers and educators about the design and implementation of future shared reading interventions.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, PRESCHOOL LANGUAGE S
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, DEP WORK PENSIONS WO
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, Methods of meta-analysis
[4]  
Baker N.D., 1984, First Language, V5, P3, DOI [DOI 10.1177/014272378400501301, 10.1177/014272378400501301]
[5]   JOINT BOOK READING MAKES FOR SUCCESS IN LEARNING TO READ - A METAANALYSIS ON INTERGENERATIONAL TRANSMISSION OF LITERACY [J].
BUS, AG ;
VAN IJZENDOORN, MH ;
PELLEGRINI, AD .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 1995, 65 (01) :1-21
[6]   A comparison of book text and Child Directed Speech [J].
Cameron-Faulkner, Thea ;
Noble, Claire .
FIRST LANGUAGE, 2013, 33 (03) :268-279
[7]  
Carpenter M, 1998, MONOGR SOC RES CHILD, V63, pV
[8]   Meta-analyzing dependent correlations: An SPSS macro and an R script [J].
Cheung, Shu Fai ;
Chan, Darius K-S .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS, 2014, 46 (02) :331-345
[9]   Dialogic reading and morphology training in Chinese children: Effects on language and literacy [J].
Chow, Bonnie Wing-Yin ;
McBride-Chang, Catherine ;
Cheung, Him ;
Chow, Celia Sze-Lok .
DEVELOPMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 44 (01) :233-244
[10]   The Efficacy of Recasts in Language Intervention: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Cleave, Patricia L. ;
Becker, Stephanie D. ;
Curran, Maura K. ;
Van Horne, Amanda J. Owen ;
Fey, Marc E. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2015, 24 (02) :237-255