Patient-reported outcome measures for pain in women with pelvic floor disorders: a systematic review

被引:5
|
作者
Ralphsmith, Maisie [1 ]
Ahern, Susannah [1 ]
Dean, Joanne [1 ]
Ruseckaite, Rasa [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
关键词
Pain; Patient-reported outcome measures; Pelvic floor disorder; Public health; Registry; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; INTERNATIONAL CONTINENCE SOCIETY; AMERICAN UROGYNECOLOGIC SOCIETY; STRESS URINARY-INCONTINENCE; INSTRUMENTS PROCEEDINGS; RECTAL SURGEONS; SYMPTOMS; IMPACT; REGISTRY; URODYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-022-05126-4
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction and hypothesis Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are helpful instruments when measuring and reporting changes in patient health status (Al Sayah et al. J Patient Rep Outcomes 5 (Suppl 2):99, 2021) such as the health-related quality of life (HrQoL) of women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry (APFPR) aims to increase capacity for women to report surgical outcomes through the collection of HrQoL data (Ruseckaite et al. Qual Life Res. 2021) but currently lacks a pain-specific PROM for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDs), particularly POP and SUI. This review aims to systematically review the existing literature and identify instruments that measure pain in women with POP and SUI for inclusion within the APFPR, which reports on complications from these conditions. Methods We conducted a literature search on OVID MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and EMCARE databases in addition to Google Scholar and grey literature to identify studies from inception to April 2021. Full-text studies were included if they used PROMs to measure pain in women with POP and SUI. Two authors independently screened articles, extracted data and assessed methodological quality. Results From 2001 studies, 23 publications describing 19 different PROMs were included for analysis. Eight of these instruments were specific to the pelvic floor; four were only specific to pain and used across multiple disorders; three were generic quality of life instruments and four were other non-validated instruments such as focus group interviews. These instruments were not specific to pain in women with POP or SUI, as they did not identify all relevant domains such as the sensation, region and duration of pain, or incidents where onset of pain occurs. Conclusions The findings of this review suggest there are no current PROMs that are suitable pain-specific instruments for women with POP or SUI. This knowledge may inform and assist in the development of a new PROM to be implemented into the APFPR.
引用
收藏
页码:2325 / 2334
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Patient-reported outcome measures for pain in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease: A systematic review
    Natale, Patrizia
    Hannan, Elyssa
    Sautenet, Benedicte
    Ju, Angela
    Perrone, Ronald D.
    Burnette, Eva
    Casteleijn, Niek
    Chapman, Arlene
    Eastty, Sarah
    Gansevoort, Ron
    Hogan, Marie
    Horie, Shigeo
    Knebelmann, Bertrand
    Lee, Richard
    Mustafa, Reem A.
    Sandford, Richard
    Baumgart, Amanda
    Tong, Allison
    Strippoli, Giovanni F. M.
    Craig, Jonathan C.
    Rangan, Gopala K.
    Cho, Yeoungjee
    PLOS ONE, 2021, 16 (05):
  • [22] Measurement properties of patient-reported outcome measures for women with dysmenorrhea: A systematic review
    de Arruda, Guilherme Tavares
    Driusso, Patricia
    de Godoy, Amanda Garcia
    de Sousa, Ana Paula
    Avila, Mariana Arias
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING, 2024, 33 (11) : 4167 - 4183
  • [23] Patient-reported outcome measures for asthma: a systematic review
    Worth, Allison
    Hammersley, Victoria
    Knibb, Rebecca
    Flokstra-de-Blok, Bertine
    DunnGalvin, Audrey
    Walker, Samantha
    Dubois, Anthony E. J.
    Sheikh, Aziz
    NPJ PRIMARY CARE RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2014, 24
  • [24] A systematic review of English language patient-reported outcome measures for use in urogynaecology and female pelvic medicine
    Gray, Thomas G.
    Vickers, Holly
    Krishnaswamy, Priyanka
    Jha, Swati
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2021, 32 (08) : 2033 - 2092
  • [25] A systematic review of English language patient-reported outcome measures for use in urogynaecology and female pelvic medicine
    Thomas G. Gray
    Holly Vickers
    Priyanka Krishnaswamy
    Swati Jha
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2021, 32 : 2033 - 2092
  • [26] Evaluation and acceptability of patient-reported outcome measures in women following pelvic organ prolapse procedures
    Rasa Ruseckaite
    Randi Jayasinghe
    Claire Bavor
    Joanne Dean
    Oliver Daly
    Susannah Ahern
    BMC Health Services Research, 23
  • [27] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Used in Temporomandibular Disorders: A Review of the Literature
    Taimeh, Dina
    Ni Riordain, Richeal
    Fedele, Stefano
    Leeson, Rachel
    JOURNAL OF ORAL & FACIAL PAIN AND HEADACHE, 2023, 37 (02) : 113 - 129
  • [28] Patient-reported outcome measures for retinoblastoma: a scoping review
    Janic, Ana
    Bowden, Sylvie
    Levy, Sarah
    Stinson, Jennifer
    Dimaras, Helen
    JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES, 2020, 4 (01)
  • [29] Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Diabetes: Systematic Review
    Wee, Priscilla Jia Ling
    Kwan, Yu Heng
    Loh, Dionne Hui Fang
    Phang, Jie Kie
    Puar, Troy H.
    Ostbye, Truls
    Thumboo, Julian
    Yoon, Sungwon
    Low, Lian Leng
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (08)
  • [30] Patient-reported outcome measures in congenital heart surgery: a systematic review
    Francis, Jeevan
    Prothasis, Sneha
    George, Joseph
    Stoica, Serban
    CARDIOLOGY IN THE YOUNG, 2023, 33 (03) : 337 - 341