Patient-reported outcome measures for pain in women with pelvic floor disorders: a systematic review

被引:6
作者
Ralphsmith, Maisie [1 ]
Ahern, Susannah [1 ]
Dean, Joanne [1 ]
Ruseckaite, Rasa [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
关键词
Pain; Patient-reported outcome measures; Pelvic floor disorder; Public health; Registry; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; INTERNATIONAL CONTINENCE SOCIETY; AMERICAN UROGYNECOLOGIC SOCIETY; STRESS URINARY-INCONTINENCE; INSTRUMENTS PROCEEDINGS; RECTAL SURGEONS; SYMPTOMS; IMPACT; REGISTRY; URODYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-022-05126-4
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction and hypothesis Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are helpful instruments when measuring and reporting changes in patient health status (Al Sayah et al. J Patient Rep Outcomes 5 (Suppl 2):99, 2021) such as the health-related quality of life (HrQoL) of women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry (APFPR) aims to increase capacity for women to report surgical outcomes through the collection of HrQoL data (Ruseckaite et al. Qual Life Res. 2021) but currently lacks a pain-specific PROM for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDs), particularly POP and SUI. This review aims to systematically review the existing literature and identify instruments that measure pain in women with POP and SUI for inclusion within the APFPR, which reports on complications from these conditions. Methods We conducted a literature search on OVID MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and EMCARE databases in addition to Google Scholar and grey literature to identify studies from inception to April 2021. Full-text studies were included if they used PROMs to measure pain in women with POP and SUI. Two authors independently screened articles, extracted data and assessed methodological quality. Results From 2001 studies, 23 publications describing 19 different PROMs were included for analysis. Eight of these instruments were specific to the pelvic floor; four were only specific to pain and used across multiple disorders; three were generic quality of life instruments and four were other non-validated instruments such as focus group interviews. These instruments were not specific to pain in women with POP or SUI, as they did not identify all relevant domains such as the sensation, region and duration of pain, or incidents where onset of pain occurs. Conclusions The findings of this review suggest there are no current PROMs that are suitable pain-specific instruments for women with POP or SUI. This knowledge may inform and assist in the development of a new PROM to be implemented into the APFPR.
引用
收藏
页码:2325 / 2334
页数:10
相关论文
共 55 条
[41]   The prevalence of pelvic floor disorders and their relationship to gender, age, parity and mode of delivery [J].
MacLennan, AH ;
Taylor, AW ;
Wilson, DH ;
Wilson, D .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2000, 107 (12) :1460-1470
[42]   Urinary incontinence in women under 65: Quality of life, stress related to incontinence and patterns of seeking health care [J].
Margalith, I ;
Gillon, G ;
Gordon, D .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2004, 13 (08) :1381-1390
[43]   Measuring patient-reported outcomes: moving beyond misplaced common sense to hard science [J].
McKenna, Stephen P. .
BMC MEDICINE, 2011, 9
[44]   The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study [J].
Mokkink, Lidwine B. ;
Terwee, Caroline B. ;
Patrick, Donald L. ;
Alonso, Jordi ;
Stratford, Paul W. ;
Knol, Dirk L. ;
Bouter, Lex M. ;
de Vet, Henrica C. W. .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2010, 19 (04) :539-549
[45]  
Passavanti MB, 2017, PAIN RES TREAT, V2017, DOI 10.1155/2017/9472925
[46]   Reliability, validity, sensitivity and internal consistency of the ICF based Basic Mobility Scale for measuring the mobility of patients with musculoskeletal problems in the acute hospital setting: a prospective study [J].
Pieber, Karin ;
Herceg, Malvina ;
Paternostro-Sluga, Tatjana ;
Pablik, Eleonore ;
Quittan, Michael ;
Nicolakis, Peter ;
Fialka-Moser, Veronika ;
Crevenna, Richard .
BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2015, 16
[47]   Evaluation of the acceptability of patient-reported outcome measures in women following pelvic floor procedures [J].
Ruseckaite, Rasa ;
Bavor, Claire ;
Marsh, Lucy ;
Dean, Joanne ;
Daly, Oliver ;
Vasiliadis, Dora ;
Ahern, Susannah .
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2022, 31 (07) :2213-2221
[48]   Impact of urinary incontinence types on women's quality of life [J].
Saboia, Dayana Maia ;
Veras Firmiano, Mariana Luisa ;
Bezerra, Karine de Castro ;
Vasconcelos Neto, Jose Ananias ;
Batista Oria, Monica Oliveira ;
Moreira Vasconcelos, Camila Teixeira .
REVISTA DA ESCOLA DE ENFERMAGEM DA USP, 2017, 51
[49]   Mesh complications in female pelvic floor reconstructive surgery and their management: A systematic review [J].
Shah, Hemendra N. ;
Badlani, Gopal H. .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2012, 28 (02) :129-153
[50]   Lifetime Risk of Undergoing Surgery for Pelvic Organ Prolapse [J].
Smith, Fiona J. ;
Holman, C. D'Arcy J. ;
Moorin, Rachael E. ;
Tsokos, Nicolas .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2010, 116 (05) :1096-1100