Patient-reported outcome measures for pain in women with pelvic floor disorders: a systematic review

被引:5
|
作者
Ralphsmith, Maisie [1 ]
Ahern, Susannah [1 ]
Dean, Joanne [1 ]
Ruseckaite, Rasa [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Dept Epidemiol & Prevent Med, Melbourne, Vic 3004, Australia
关键词
Pain; Patient-reported outcome measures; Pelvic floor disorder; Public health; Registry; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; INTERNATIONAL CONTINENCE SOCIETY; AMERICAN UROGYNECOLOGIC SOCIETY; STRESS URINARY-INCONTINENCE; INSTRUMENTS PROCEEDINGS; RECTAL SURGEONS; SYMPTOMS; IMPACT; REGISTRY; URODYNAMICS;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-022-05126-4
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction and hypothesis Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are helpful instruments when measuring and reporting changes in patient health status (Al Sayah et al. J Patient Rep Outcomes 5 (Suppl 2):99, 2021) such as the health-related quality of life (HrQoL) of women with pelvic organ prolapse (POP) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). The Australasian Pelvic Floor Procedure Registry (APFPR) aims to increase capacity for women to report surgical outcomes through the collection of HrQoL data (Ruseckaite et al. Qual Life Res. 2021) but currently lacks a pain-specific PROM for women with pelvic floor disorders (PFDs), particularly POP and SUI. This review aims to systematically review the existing literature and identify instruments that measure pain in women with POP and SUI for inclusion within the APFPR, which reports on complications from these conditions. Methods We conducted a literature search on OVID MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and EMCARE databases in addition to Google Scholar and grey literature to identify studies from inception to April 2021. Full-text studies were included if they used PROMs to measure pain in women with POP and SUI. Two authors independently screened articles, extracted data and assessed methodological quality. Results From 2001 studies, 23 publications describing 19 different PROMs were included for analysis. Eight of these instruments were specific to the pelvic floor; four were only specific to pain and used across multiple disorders; three were generic quality of life instruments and four were other non-validated instruments such as focus group interviews. These instruments were not specific to pain in women with POP or SUI, as they did not identify all relevant domains such as the sensation, region and duration of pain, or incidents where onset of pain occurs. Conclusions The findings of this review suggest there are no current PROMs that are suitable pain-specific instruments for women with POP or SUI. This knowledge may inform and assist in the development of a new PROM to be implemented into the APFPR.
引用
收藏
页码:2325 / 2334
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Patient-reported outcome measures for pain in women with pelvic floor disorders: a systematic review
    Maisie Ralphsmith
    Susannah Ahern
    Joanne Dean
    Rasa Ruseckaite
    International Urogynecology Journal, 2022, 33 : 2325 - 2334
  • [2] Comparing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Pain in Women With Pelvic Floor Disorders: A Scoping Review
    Hoque, Sheymonti S.
    Ahern, Susannah
    O'Connell, Helen E.
    Romero, Lorena
    Ruseckaite, Rasa
    JOURNAL OF PAIN, 2024, 25 (06)
  • [3] Evaluation of the acceptability of patient-reported outcome measures in women following pelvic floor procedures
    Ruseckaite, Rasa
    Bavor, Claire
    Marsh, Lucy
    Dean, Joanne
    Daly, Oliver
    Vasiliadis, Dora
    Ahern, Susannah
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2022, 31 (07) : 2213 - 2221
  • [4] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) in Pelvic Floor Disorders
    Habashy, Engy
    Mahdy, Ayman E.
    CURRENT UROLOGY REPORTS, 2019, 20 (05)
  • [5] Evaluation of the acceptability of patient-reported outcome measures in women following pelvic floor procedures
    Rasa Ruseckaite
    Claire Bavor
    Lucy Marsh
    Joanne Dean
    Oliver Daly
    Dora Vasiliadis
    Susannah Ahern
    Quality of Life Research, 2022, 31 : 2213 - 2221
  • [6] Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Use in Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse A Systematic Review
    Dieter, Alexis A.
    Halder, Gabriela E.
    Pennycuff, Jon F.
    Singh, Ruchira
    El-Nashar, Sherif A.
    Lipetskaia, Lioudmila
    Orejuela, Francisco J.
    Jeppson, Peter C.
    Sleemi, Ambereen
    Raman, Sonali V.
    Balk, Ethan M.
    Rogers, Rebecca G.
    Antosh, Danielle D.
    OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2023, 141 (06) : 1098 - 1114
  • [7] Patient-reported outcome measures in vitreoretinal surgery: a systematic review
    Yoganathan, Anusha
    Sandinha, Teresa
    Shamdas, Mohith
    Diafas, Asterios
    Steel, David
    EYE, 2023, 37 (03) : 391 - 401
  • [8] A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures in paediatric otolaryngology
    Powell, J.
    Powell, S.
    Robson, A.
    JOURNAL OF LARYNGOLOGY AND OTOLOGY, 2018, 132 (01) : 2 - 7
  • [9] The impact of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice for pain: a systematic review
    Michelle M. Holmes
    George Lewith
    David Newell
    Jonathan Field
    Felicity L. Bishop
    Quality of Life Research, 2017, 26 : 245 - 257
  • [10] The impact of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice for pain: a systematic review
    Holmes, Michelle M.
    Lewith, George
    Newell, David
    Field, Jonathan
    Bishop, Felicity L.
    QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (02) : 245 - 257