Biosimilars: A consideration of the regulations in the United States and European union

被引:49
作者
Daller, Justin [1 ]
机构
[1] Baxter Healthcare Corp, Med Prod, Preclin Safety & Efficacy, Round Lake, IL 60073 USA
关键词
Biosimilar; Pharmacovigilance; Extrapolation; Interchangeability; Regulation; PHARMACOVIGILANCE LEGISLATION CONSIDERATIONS; EXTRAPOLATION; INFLIXIMAB; CHALLENGE; CT-P13; EUS;
D O I
10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.12.013
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
Biosimilars are defined as biological products that are highly similar to a reference product, notwithstanding minor differences in clinically inactive components. Biosimilars show no clinically meaningful differences in safety, purity, and potency of the product in comparison to the reference product. With the ever looming patent expiry of some major high cost biologics, biosimilar production is becoming ever more lucrative to companies. Europe (EU) set the precedent, followed by the United States (US) in early 2012, for the approval process for biosimilars. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to explore the nature of the regulatory processes in the US and EU and to determine the requirements of each in the approval process of a biosimilar. The current Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency's (EMA) guidance documents for biosimilars were reviewed revealing a need for further clarifications, as well as specifically addressing Celltrion's and Sandoz's application for approval for the biosimilars infliximab and filgrastim, respectively. Currently, the FDA and EMA focus on comparability in terms of the clinical, pharmacokinetic (PK)/pharmacodynamic (PD), preclinical, biological activity, and physiochemical characterization results, as well as requiring a robust and consistent manufacturing process. Both the EU and US have prepared guidance documents for biosimilars that will result in biotherapeutics that are as safe and efficacious as the innovator product but the necessity exists to globally harmonize international nonproprietary naming nomenclature and clarify how the concept of pharmacovigilance, extrapolation, and interchangeability will be handled and regulated in the future. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 208
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Biosimilars: Impact of Biologic Product Life Cycle and European Experience on the Regulatory Trajectory in the United States
    Ahmed, Islah
    Kaspar, Ben
    Sharma, Uma
    [J]. CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2012, 34 (02) : 400 - 419
  • [2] Alliance for Safe Biologic Medicine, 2012, ASBM BIOS SURV
  • [3] AMGEN, 2014, BIOL BIOS OV
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, BIOSIMILAR NEWS
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2012, EMA
  • [6] Bagdhdadi R., 2014, BIOSIMILARS 2014 INT
  • [7] A Comparison of Proposed Biosimilar and Originator Filgrastim for the Prevention of Neutropenia in Patients with Breast Cancer Receiving Myelosuppressive Adjuvant or Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind Trial (The PIONEER study)
    Blackwell, Kimberly
    Semiglazov, Vladimir
    Gascon, Pedro
    Nakov, Roumen
    Kramer, Stefan
    Schwebig, Arnd
    Harbeck, Nadia
    [J]. BLOOD, 2014, 124 (21)
  • [8] Author's Reply to Borg et al. Comment on: "EU's New Pharmacovigilance Legislation: Considerations for Biosimilars"
    Calvo, Begona
    [J]. DRUG SAFETY, 2014, 37 (02) : 125 - 126
  • [9] EU's New Pharmacovigilance Legislation: Considerations for Biosimilars
    Calvo, Begona
    Zuniga, Leyre
    [J]. DRUG SAFETY, 2014, 37 (01) : 9 - 18
  • [10] Biosimilars 101: considerations for US oncologists in clinical practice
    Camacho, Luis H.
    Frost, Craig P.
    Abella, Esteban
    Morrow, Phuong K.
    Whittaker, Sadie
    [J]. CANCER MEDICINE, 2014, 3 (04): : 889 - 899